CNN wants Republican voters convinced the midterms are already lost before they cast a ballot. Selective data and carefully chosen "Republicans" give them the result they want, then they present it as public opinion. This is election propaganda from a network campaigning for Democrats.
@CNN This is why you got kicked out of the pressroom. You cant deliver truthful and impartial news.
President Trump is doing a better job than the Democrats ever could do.
Trump year 2 compared to Biden year 2:
@LeaderJohnThune 85% of the ENTIRE US electorate demanded the SAVE Act. You didn't pass it.
You showed us you consider yourself an elite with ZERO accountability to We the People.
@AJEnglish Meanwhile, at last count, 27 independent news outlets with a combined viewership of almost 1 billion have taken up the call to Provide independent, objective and narrative-free reporting and coverage of the White House and President Trump.
You and the rest of the MSM are done.
@sarajust You and the others were trusted to report the news IMPARTIALLY and OBJECTIVELY. Instead You turned the news into your own personal opinion piece and you've been editing and deleting good news, and only showing us what you dont like.
You will not be missed.
@GavinNewsom Translation:
Like everything else, I just signed an order to make California Democrats more wealthy by creating more hostile corporate regulation and TAXES that will inevitably make it impossible for us to have AI without paying a premium for it.
You're saying it's a crime to offer people money to vote a certain way? Correct?
What do you call it when you take American taxpayer dollars and give it to illegal aliens as incentive to vote for liberal candidates?
Those are my tax dollars too. If President Trump wants to return American tax dollars back to American taxpayers, that's called a REFUND, not a bribe.
I'm all in.
@NewsBlast17 Since 2016 you guys have been ranting and raving. Relentlessly misleading people and selling hopium.
Patriots are NOT in control.
You dont have everything.
We aren't watching a movie.
We are on our own, and you idiots need to give it a rest.
Your messiah aint gettin it done.
Nepal is not the US.
We have almost A MILLION homeless on our streets right now. That's where the money goes. We don't need to send money to other countries. They have their own economy, they have their own taxpayers, they have their own government. Nepal's problems are not the United States problems.
@TRobinsonNewEra@AlertaGlobal24H It’s much different seeing this in real-time. Raw video like this shows us the intensity and chaos that words alone can't capture.
@BlessedTXvet It's actually aged REALLY WELL.
Europe is paying almost 2x what the United States is paying for gasoline. Once again proves unless the US keeps the Straits open, Europe cannot and they continue to feel the pain at the pumps. Infographic attached with sources:
@lisamurkowski Senator, you live in an age of instant information retrieval and verification. Everything you've ever supported or stated is saved somewhere. You're a fool if you think we won't remember your other lies or ratio you.
Midterms are looming, and we're in no mood for RINOs:
@StephenM The core issue is self-government.
A nation cannot remain sovereign if citizenship is detached from allegiance, domicile, and lawful membership.
U.S. citizenship is not a souvenir for crossing the border.
It is membership in a Constitutional Republic.
@LeadingReport This is why Thomas matters.
He is not arguing against citizenship.
He is arguing against turning citizenship into a geographic accident detached from allegiance, domicile, and self-government.
That debate is not going away.
The China angle is exactly why this cannot be treated like a law-school abstraction.
If birth on U.S. soil creates citizenship even when neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident, every adversary understands the incentive.
Citizenship policy is national security policy.
The EO point is fair.
But if the Court constitutionalized near-automatic birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, Congress cannot simply statute its way around that.
That is why the distinction matters:
Kavanaugh left Congress room.
The majority made the fight much harder.
The dangerous part is that the majority did not merely block one executive order.
It appears to constitutionalize the rule.
That means the next fight has to be honest:
statutory limits where possible,
constitutional amendment where necessary,
and no more pretending the issue is forbidden.