@MTGNobody420@wizards_magic@DotEleven not quite, but the outcome is correct. The key part is ‘enters with’ which is a replacement effect and not an etb. So nothing goes on the stack as it resolves and enters.
You can have abilities go on the stack with reflexive triggers that contain the word ‘if’.
@SaffronOlive I wonder what the difference has been in testing cards since increasing the number of sets. The most recent problematic cards are so easy to determine as too powerful.
@SaffronOlive The three year window was a smart move during the time that Standard sealed products were increasing in price and Standard engagement was on a downward trend.
The kicker was increasing the number of sets each year. Two big changes with no settling in time.
@themanwong@fireshoes I’ve been jamming Synthesizer since OTJ/BIG. I’ve always ran a playset of Enigma Jewel. It means Repurposing Bay can be activated on T3. It also helps with playing and sac’ing Carrot Cake on T2. Crafting becomes more viable too.
Well done on the 9-6 with this list 💪
@GoldenHorncall@SCGCON Can’t wait for the carbon copy net decks to also be running Poison Dart Frog asking for paid sideboard guides on how to use the Frog 🐸
@DackFayden07 From your experience, would you attribute the trash draws to variance or maybe some part of the deck that could do with greater redundancy?
@Metallix87@SaffronOlive Yep totally agree. And therefore more tools for non-agressive strategies too. I think larger standard is great. They just need to adjust the pacing of sets and ban as and when need to maintain format health.
@Matej_Zatlkaj@SaffronOlive I really like having more sets in Standard. There’s way more capacity for different mechanics and archetypes to shine at the same time.
However, 6 sets a year is absurd. It’s hurting all parties. Even Wotc are fumbling with this aggressive pace.
Ban cards as and when.