Eymard Sarah

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @shivon Funny after being sure I saw pple being on Epstein file during soccer Beckham after being i've said nothing about French pedos coming back. If there was a religion for those trying to hide Epstein that would be SickElon MuskDick.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @shivon Elon Musk doesn't Like feminist I find it Cool. I abort pple covering pedos.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @shivon Elon Musk doesn't the meaning of asile. Since he has 4 children per year. The day he won't we would think he has cancer.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @BProudPatriot Too expensive. I need asile.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @brivael Have fun since you have no moral.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @brivael Elon Musk Sweet yourself she changed name to escape Epstein's Brunel's perquisition. But since I have no value is part of your life.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @ShitpostGate Elon Musk. Do we agree. Protecting pedos is not the same than being financed by Epstein. If it is the same Elon Musk does not have the right to have children since social housing the children out to protect. Do we agree or smoking weeds has side effect on you.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

**In France, the risks for someone who files a request for tutelle (adult guardianship) or curatelle (curatorship) that is later rejected or “cassée” (quashed/overturned on appeal or by the Cour de cassation) are mainly civil and only arise if abuse of process or abuse of rights is proven.** There is no automatic penalty simply because the request fails or the decision is reversed.

### 1. The right to request tutelle is protected
Any person with a legitimate interest (the person concerned, their spouse/partner, parent, relative, close stable connection, or the public prosecutor) can apply to the **juge des contentieux de la protection** (the protection disputes judge, formerly the tutelles judge) for a protective measure for an adult whose faculties are impaired.

The procedure requires a detailed medical certificate from an approved doctor (cost around €192). The judge conducts a contradictory process (hearing the person, possible social inquiry, etc.) and must choose the least restrictive measure in the person’s best interest.

A good-faith request based on reasonable grounds is legitimate, even if the judge ultimately refuses the measure, chooses a lighter one, or the decision is later overturned. Courts can reassess facts, evidence, or legal interpretation on appeal.

### 2. Risks only arise in cases of “abus de droit” or “abus de procédure” (“abuse of law” / abuse of rights or procedure)
French law sanctions the misuse of legal rights when exercised in bad faith or contrary to their purpose (here, protecting a vulnerable person). This is governed by:

- **Article 1240 of the Civil Code** (civil liability for fault causing damage).
- **Article 32-1 of the Code of Civil Procedure** (civil fine for dilatory or abusive court action).
- **Article 559 of the Code of Civil Procedure** (same for abusive appeals).

The judge (or appeal court) may sanction if the request is:
- Manifestly unfounded or frivolous (no serious medical evidence, no real indication of incapacity).
- Dilatory (intended to delay other proceedings, e.g., inheritance or divorce).
- Vexatious or made with clear intent to harm or in bad faith (e.g., family harassment, attempt to seize control of assets without genuine protective need, repeated requests after prior rejections, or pressuring a doctor for a biased certificate).
- A misuse of the legal tool for personal gain unrelated to protection (“abus de loi” / détournement de procédure).

**Possible sanctions** (these are not automatic — the court must give detailed reasons):
- **Civil fine** of up to **€10,000** payable to the Treasury.
- **Damages** awarded to the person whose protection was sought (or their heirs) under Article 1240 of the Civil Code, to compensate for prejudice such as stress, humiliation from medical examinations/investigations, reputational harm, family conflict, or costs incurred. Amounts vary but are usually moderate unless significant harm is proven.
- Order to pay the other party’s legal costs (Article 700 CPC) or, in some cases, shift procedure costs away from the protected person’s assets onto the unsuccessful requester.
- In extreme/repeated cases: risk of being treated as a vexatious litigant, which can lead to future restrictions on filing actions.

**Important clarifications**:
- Simply losing the case, having the request rejected, or seeing a tutelle order “cassée” (quashed) on appeal or cassation **does not** automatically mean the original request was abusive. Many legitimate requests are refused or reformed because evidence is deemed insufficient, circumstances change, or a less restrictive measure is preferred.
- If a tutelle was granted and later quashed, the protective effects generally end (with possible need to regularize past acts), but this alone does not create personal liability for the original requester unless bad faith or fault is separately proven.

### 3. Criminal risks (very low for a standard request)
Criminal liability is rare and requires ad

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @AlphaSignalAI Or Elon Musk. If Grok is not fit enough and cloudy at some time why not to create. Distinct ai with selected sources per subject ?

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @ShitpostGate By the way nervous steaks un double but in minced meet. No use for them. When all the other are tender if properly cooked.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

This what people did during the war and after. Used cheaper part of the mild done properly until it it not nervous. This is how we separate cheaper meats from the other. No one need a steak like a chewing-gum. They have always have separate cheaper meats from the other according to the part. Insane to do diffently. We only need unervous steaks.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

Beef Cuts Guide: Which Parts of the Cow and Which Ones to Braise for Beef Bourguignon (and Why)

A cow is divided into forequarter (shoulder, neck, breast) and hindquarter (leg, loin).

Tender “noble” cuts (from muscles that do little work) are best for quick, dry-heat cooking like grilling or roasting.

Tougher, working-muscle cuts are loaded with connective tissue (collagen) and are perfect for long, slow braising. In a dish like Beef Bourguignon, the collagen melts into gelatin over 2.5–4 hours of gentle simmering. This makes the meat fork-tender and silky, while naturally thickening and enriching the sauce.

Best Cuts for Beef Bourguignon
Cut the meat into 4–5 cm (1.5–2 inch) cubes for even cooking.

Chuck (Paleron / Shoulder)** — The classic and most recommended choice. Well-marbled with a perfect balance of meat, fat, and collagen. Becomes meltingly tender, holds its shape, and delivers deep beefy flavor that pairs beautifully with red wine.

Blade / Chuck Eye / Shoulder Clod** — Very similar to chuck; economical and excellent.

Brisket** — From the breast/chest. Intense flavor, good marbling. Becomes very tender and sliceable after long braising.

Short Ribs** — Rich, meaty, lots of collagen and fat. Give luxurious texture and flavor.

Shank / Shin (Jarret)** — Extremely collagen-rich (especially with bone/marrow). Produces a thick, glossy sauce.

Cheek (Joue)** — One of the most prized for bourguignon. Super gelatinous, almost confit-like texture, absorbs flavors wonderfully.

Neck / Collar** — Affordable, flavorful, and very forgiving in long cooks.

Plate / Flank / Skirt** (in moderation) — Can work but are leaner; better mixed with fattier cuts.

Pro tip: Mix 2–3 different cuts (e.g., chuck + brisket + a few cheeks) for varied textures and more complex flavor in the same pot.

Cuts to Avoid for Bourguignon
Tenderloin (Filet), Sirloin, Ribeye, Striploin** — Too lean and tender. They dry out and become tough and stringy after hours of simmering. Save these for steaks or quick roasts.

Quick Overview of Main Beef Cuts by Region
Forequarter (front)**: Neck, shoulder (chuck/paleron), brisket, short ribs, plate → Mostly braising cuts.
Rib section**: Ribeye, prime rib → Grilling/roasting.
Hindquarter (rear)**: Sirloin, tenderloin, round (top/bottom), rump, shank → Mix; shank and parts of round are great for braising.
Other**: Flank, hanger, skirt → Quick grill or short braise.

Why These Cuts Work So Well
Muscles that worked hard during the animal’s life (shoulder, leg, neck, chest) develop lots of collagen and flavor compounds. Slow moist heat breaks down the collagen into gelatin → tender meat + silky sauce. Lean, tender cuts lack this collagen, so they just dry out.

For the best bourguignon: choose meat with visible fat and connective tissue, sear it well first for flavor, and simmer low and slow. Enjoy! 🍲

If you want a full English recipe or variations, just let me know.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @ShitpostGate Que

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @ShitpostGate

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @ShitpostGate Guess where the word nervous incutzmable is from.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

This is not at all that Elon Musk., as per usual he understands nothing. In the abatory where meat is killed. Where they supposed to hit and kill them. In France they have been many scandals. What is the result ? For vegans disgusts also for people eating animals the same nobody like watch it. For people fond of meat the result is nervous meat impossible to cut. Have a good appetite.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @ShitpostGate This is a that moment not in praying before eating. And in the where they live and how they are killed results in easy to cut meat. Better meat.
Vegans don't care. They result is tasted by meat lover. They should care more than vegans.

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk

[Eymard Sarah @SarahEym]

@elonmusk @AlphaSignalAI

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Mark Zuckerberg just told the world his own company shouldn’t exist.

Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.”

He runs Meta. 70,000 employees.

He just described a future where one person replaces all of them. And he’s the one building it.

That is not a prediction about technology. That is a CEO engineering the obsolescence of his own workforce. While they watch him do it.

Every company, every government, every university, every hospital on Earth was built on a single premise.

No one person could do it alone.

That is not a feature of civilization. It is the foundation. Every hierarchy, every org chart, every payroll ever written exists because of that one limitation.

Zuckerberg just announced the limitation is ending.

So follow the logic where it leads.

If one person can produce the output of ten thousand, what is one person worth?

Now look at the word “everyone” in his sentence.

Because this does not land on everyone. It never has.

The printing press was sold as liberation. It built media empires.

The internet was sold as liberation. It built trillion-dollar platforms.

The tool always arrives as freedom. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward.

Zuckerberg does not gain the power of 10,000 people. He already has that.

He gains the power of 10,000 organizations.

Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?”

He was making a case for building AI.

Read that again as an employee.

A man who commands 70,000 people just questioned whether their collective intelligence exceeds one person’s.

That is not a vision for the future.

That is the most honest thing a CEO has ever said out loud about the people who built his empire.