I guess we should have included a recommendation that they shouldn't engage the public about inclusiveness through a closed, secretive process. But I kind of thought it would have been obvious...My mistake.
SMH b/c #OIRA sought comments on how to engage the public via a shielded announcement & without any transparency into the comments received. No Federal Register notice and not via https://t.co/jNDIOgEp3U. This process = unengaging! https://t.co/itv9doG2DS
So the REINS Act wants to put Congress in charge of approving all major regulations. Because when you ask people to think of efficient governing and objective decision-making they automatically think of the U.S. Congress....wait a second, that's not right.
"The REINS Act is a radical threat – one of the most radical in generations – to our government’s ability to protect the public from harm."
Check out written testimony submitted by @Public_Citizen's @BitsySkerry.
https://t.co/Tx2RIy5gjq
So happy that my rep @marygayscanlon is making some good common sense points opposing the REINS Act and about the reality that Congress already has plenty of regulatory oversight that it simply doesn't use much. It would be a huge mistake to make them gatekeepers for major regs
Professor Hammond is doing a great job. Clear and direct about how the REINS Act will make the regulatory process worse and undercut important protections that save lives.
Apparently a big concern among supporters of REINS Act is that agency officials who write regs are unelected and that somehow that means they are unaccountable. But they are constrained but administrative laws and can be taken to court (and often are) if they overreach.
A witness just claimed that agencies are only "technically" part of the executive branch. That they are effectively a new fourth branch unaccountable to even the executive branch. This must be news to the President.
@yaelwrites@maassive Lol. I can't even count how many people write Seth at the top of their emails to me. Occupational hazard when you share a last name and first initial with a sitting member of Congress.
@resentfultweet@morisy@TWallack It's actually even worse because they only count working days. So that #FOIA response actually took 11.5 years. Almost enough time for you kid to start in first grade and then make it to high school graduation. Does that seem too long?
Grassley, Leahy, Cornyn And Feinstein Introduce Bipartisan Bill To Reinforce Transparency In Wake Of The Supreme Court’s #FOIA Decision And Recent Regulations -- https://t.co/eBw8TyzRr1
So true and so unfortunate. Whistleblowers stand up for what is right and the run the very real risk of somehow ruining their reputation in the process. #POGOchat