Report: the Applicant made an access request for records to the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission. The SHRC denied access to the record in its entirety under section 15(1)(c), 15(1)(d), 22(a) and 22(c) of FOIP https://t.co/KNH3vNpI90
Report: the Commissioner recommended that Community Safety release the classification and salary information of the employee to the Applicant within 30 days among other recommendations https://t.co/07sAjSqWYc
Report: the Commissioner recommended Community Safety release the information that was provided by the Applicant or the information that is clearly within the Applicant’s knowledge among other recommendations https://t.co/KsuPzeOPLZ
Report: this review will consider if the City properly identified certain records as non-responsive, if it properly applied sections 16(1)(b) and 28(1) of LA FOIP to withhold parts of the records https://t.co/Ub2LopgDd0
Report: the School Division provided the Applicant with access to some records in full and others in part. The Applicant requested a review of the search efforts. The Deputy Commissioner found that the School Division conducted a reasonable search https://t.co/yiG7hhPw1L
Report: the Commissioner did find that the access provisions in LA FOIP complements the existing procedures regarding access to yearbooks pursuant to section 4(a) of LA FOIP https://t.co/hjJD3JxKY6
Report: the Commissioner recommended that the Town:
amend its procedures going forward and when it issues written notices pursuant to section 7(2)(b) of LA FOIP, it provides links to specific publicly available resources https://t.co/SeW2lhA0US
Report: The Commissioner found the Resort Village of Shields properly refused the fee waiver request, but the fee estimate was unreasonable and should have been $218.50. Recommended the fee estimate be reissued and request processed if 50% deposit paid. https://t.co/opCl0kl8Be
Report: The Commissioner found that the Town of LaFleche properly applied section 16(1)(a) of LA FOIP to the withheld portion of the auditor's letter, and recommended that the information continue to be withheld. https://t.co/FJWOuOBe64
Report: the Commissioner recommended that: Health make additional efforts to contact the outstanding 140 unintended recipients in an effort to fully contain this privacy breach; and engage ARCAS in a written formal contract https://t.co/nwI7npAVPc
Report: the Complainant wanted to know: (1) if SaskPower collected, used and/or disclosed employees’ personal information through its use of the AVL technology and the purpose of the collection; and (2) whether it was authorized by FOIP https://t.co/m3ObuGTosa
Record retention and records schedules are the foundation for an effective records management program. See below for how a records schedule is defined in The Archives and Public Records Management Act.
Report: the Complainant learned that a pharmacy technician who is an employee of the SHA disclosed information about the Complainant’s health status to two different individuals on two separate occasions through the messaging app, Snapchat https://t.co/0KKmCrkase
Report: the Commissioner found that SHRC properly applied section 16(1)(a) of FOIP to the withheld portion of the records. Because this exemption is mandatory in nature and properly applied, the Commissioner cannot request the head to reconsider https://t.co/oEyq51mt6o
Report: the Applicant submitted an access to information request to the City of Lloydminster. The City released responsive records, withholding portions pursuant to sections 21(a), 21(b), 21(c) and 28(1) of LA FOIP https://t.co/r3qd9RA5BX
Report: the Applicant requested a record from the Ministry of Justice and Attorney General. The Commissioner found that Justice properly applied section 13(1)(a) of FOIP to the information in the record. https://t.co/KVOSplCOav
In recognition of Records and Information Management month, our office has a blog with tips that may assist organizations in managing their electronic records https://t.co/A1gbBSMIMI
Report: The snooper in these two matters, is the same person, Investigation Report 166-2025 (Part I) and Investigation Report 082-2025 (Part II) so the two Investigation Reports should be read together https://t.co/NkSYoBRYEh