@ArtJbing@chanelstepfathr@prewitt_aiden Yes! If given the opportunity to introduce someone to information, it's a tremendous responsibility to, when possible, let them come to their own conclusions before telling them how it be. How to think, not what to think.
@dem_ohs@ArtJbing Yeah I did acknowledge it. Different accounts differ. If every perspective in there was a carbon copy it would most certainly be a fraud. Don't know why you keep on doing the tu quoque. I say Greek and and Hebrew can help with the entire book. Argue better.
@chanelstepfathr@prewitt_aiden@ArtJbing Yeah I'll agree to that. The trick is, for me anyway, making sure the teacher and the pupile are personally invested in the lesson. If either of them have a chip on their shoulder over the lesson itself, you're just gonna get weak polemics out of it.
@chanelstepfathr@ArtJbing I asked that they not learn about it through other people's perspective. And they list off classes that involve people's perspective, and do not involve reading the Bible. Reading is hard.
@dem_ohs@ArtJbing That's like, your opinion dude. Ant contradictions from different accounts? No way! Unheard of! Greek and Hebrew can absolutely be an asset when looking for nuanced meaning throughout the entire Bible. But nice try shutting me down with a couple what abouts.