@yupp_ai 6/6
Now you must arrange the models CORRECTLY:
I have written the names models for you, but they are in the WRONG ORDER:
Flux 2 dev turbo
HiDream i1 fast
Google imagen 4
Seedream 3.0
Nano Banana
Z-image turbo
Ideogram V3 turbo
Bria Fast
Qwen image 2512
Luma Photon
1/6 How well do you know the AI models you work with? I suggest @yupp_ai we hold a mini contest where users guess the names of 10 models.
In the post below, I will write the names of all 10 randomly models, and you have to put them in the RIGHT order!
1) Model A?
2) Model B?
@yupp_ai 7/7 The results of the experiment on @yupp_ai , the top five leaders:
1) Nano Banana - 1st place
2) GPT image 1 mini - 2 st place
3) Seefream 4.5 max - 3rd place
4) Ideogram V3 turbo - 4 place
5) Minimax image 01 - 5
i hope you enjoyed it, because i really liked experiments!
1/7 I conducting another experiment on my favorite platform, @yupp_ai . Again, i testing 10 models (randomly). The task was to draw a scene from the cartoon Despicable Me, but I DELIBERATELY did not send sketches of the villains. The AI models had to guess what they looked like!
@yupp_ai 6/7
9) Bytedance SDXL - 2 points of 10 A frightening picture, but i was pleased by the two large minions. There is no mention of any characters named Gru or Vector here.
10) Bria fast - 1 point of 10 The worst result, it's not even minions, let alone other tasks.
@yupp_ai 7/7
Now to the top five:
1) Google imagen 4 ultra
2) Nano banana PRO 2k
3) Google imagen 3
4) Seedream 4.0 max
5) Ideogram v3 quality
Thank you, @yupp_ai , for the interesting experience. How would you rank the results?
End ot thread.
1/7 Do you love cats? Who doesnt?:) i conducted an interesting experiment on @yupp_ai where i compared 10 image generation models. My request was to create a cat shelter with at least 10 cats in a cartoon style. Lets see what came out and give them scores. Next🔽🔽🔽
@yupp_ai 6/7
9) Google imagen 4 ultra - in my opinion, this is the best work, ALL requirements have been met - 10 of 10 points.
10) Google imagen 3 - The previous version of Google was also good, but it fell short - 8 out of 10 points.
Next. Result 🔽🔽🔽