Privacy by default $SOL $SUI zcash:native
Solana, SUI and Zcash offer private transactions meaning your account and tx amounts cannot be seen publically in a block explorer.
By default currently none are private and all require choosing a private transaction. The zero knowledge proofs do however require overhead, slowing the settlements down. However SUI has begun a rollout of private transactions by default with almost no impact in performance.
In short, SUI is positioning itself as a high-performance chain where privacy is normal and programmable, Solana treats it as an optional enhancement, and Zcash makes strong privacy available but not seamless or default.
Privacy is a new narrative heading into 2027 but most dont understand what it means. Even on Zcash privacy is optional and not default. All 3 use varients of zk proofs to achieve privacy.
However, Zcash is not an execution network meaning it cannot run programs (its a fork of Bitcoin) it is slow and only applicable to occasional value transfer, not mass adoption and agentic capacity.
Solana and SUI are the 2 execution leaders both offering privacy capable of serving mass human and agentic adoption, SUI's latest update tries to thread the needle however with better default privacy than Solana, more compliant/programmable than pure privacy coins like Zcash, while preserving its high throughput advantages.
I will continue to share advances in the privacy rollouts of these two best of class execution networks.
#HYPE
Güncel görünüm.
Dostlar $HYPE grafiği cidden güzel.
Tarihi direnci kırdıktan sonra güzel bir retestte yaptı ve retest onayını da almış görünüyor.
Piyasa genelinde bir sıkıntı olmaz ise yükselişine kaldığı yerden devam etmesi beklenebilir.
Yakın takibinizde olsun.
The moment #Bitcoin consolidates, liquidity flows back towards the strongest assets.
The higher Bitcoin bounces upwards, the higher those assets will go.
It's quite clear for me that assets like $NEAR, $HYPE, $ONDO will go back to their highs and potentially higher in coming period.
This can't be a coincidence.
On May 7, White House official Patrick Witt said the goal is to pass the Clarity Act by July 4, 2026.
Since then, $BTC has dropped about 27%, crashing to $59,000.
On June 1, the bill was added to the Senate Legislative Calendar, meaning it's now eligible for a full Senate vote. With July 4 approaching, the window for debate and voting is getting tight.
Could big players be pushing BTC lower so banks and institutions can accumulate cheaper before the Clarity Act moves forward?
Arthur Hayes(@CryptoHayes) just bought back 33,978 $HYPE($2.09M)!
4 days ago, he posted that he dumped his entire $HYPE to take profit when the price was above $72.
$HYPE then dropped ~23% to below $56.
40 minutes ago, a wallet linked to #ArthurHayes withdrew 33,978$HYPE($2.09M) from #Bybit.
https://t.co/IqRCDMZqGh
The higher timeframe level for $NEAR to be accumulating positions is here.
It simply went down to the fact that it's being used a lot to swap $ZEC <> $BTC.
Other than that, the thesis of NEAR has only become stronger, which means that accumulating a position at a bargain is a great opportunity.
I also expect other AI protocols to be waking up again: $TAO, $FET, $REZ.
Crypto Marketing
Imagine trying to sell a house like many people market Hyperliquid.
A family pulls up for a showing.
They ask, “How many bedrooms?”
The realtor stares at them and says:
“House.”
They ask, “What’s the neighborhood like?”
“House.”
“Any foundation issues?”
“House.”
“Has the roof been replaced?”
“House.”
“Okay…but why should we buy this house instead of the one down the street?”
The realtor smiles confidently, folds his arms, and says:
“House.”
That is not marketing.
That is just identifying the object.
And that’s exactly how some of you sound under every crypto post.
Someone complains about CEX custody risk:
“Hyperliquid.”
Someone talks about trading UX:
“Hyperliquid.”
Someone mentions perps, liquidity, speed, fees, transparency, decentralization, market structure, or literally anything with a bid and an ask:
“Hyperliquid.”
Okay. And?
Why should they care?
What problem does it solve?
What pain does it remove?
What experience does it improve?
What makes it better for the person you’re talking to?
Great products still need explanation. Repeating the name only works on people who already understand the value.
Everyone else just sees a guy on the lawn repeating “House” and wonders if the property comes with asbestos.
(I am both a hyperliquid:native token holder and have an active long position at the time of this post).
Everyone is talking about Arthur Hayes dumping #HYPE, and its impact on the price ..
But this episode also says something about #HYPE’s resilience.
Despite the sell off and a weak market, #HYPE outperformed both BTC and ETH.
Over the past 7 days (data from CG):
• HYPE: -13.2%
• BTC: -15.2%
• ETH: -19.1%
Thoughts on #HYPE:
$HYPE is showing signs of strength after reclaiming the lower horizontal support zone, a level that previously acted as a key demand area. The sharp selloff appears to be losing momentum, and buyers have stepped in to defend support, preventing further downside for now.
As long as this zone continues to hold $HYPE, a relief rally toward higher resistance levels becomes increasingly likely. While the broader trend remains under pressure, the current structure favors a dead cat bounce in the short term. Reclaiming nearby moving averages would further strengthen the case for an extended recovery move.
Market’s getting wrecked, but Hyperliquid’s business model is still eating.
last 24h: $hype generated over $4.6M in fees, up 34.15%.
don’t forget that SpaceX IPO drops next week on June 12, and HL is currently the best place to trade SpaceX pre-IPO.
Volume goes up → Fees go up → More $HYPE buybacks.
The flywheel doesn’t care about the broader market, imo
@HyperliquidX