Benjamin Scheiter

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

Prism: a local-first Chrome extension for cleaning up prompts before they go into AI chat.

It removes filler, keeps exact code/URLs untouched, and makes the request clearer without changing the intent.

https://t.co/FxRkRF91Li

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@robbyphdnh @mayemusk Are you aware that that is how capitalism works? The more useful you are to society, the more money you have by result.
You’re essentially saying that one person “shouldn’t” be allowed to be that useful to the world. That’s a ridiculous statement

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@elonmusk @jawwwn_ @60Minutes I think that is generalisable across almost everything - if they knew how to do it, they would be doing it, not teaching others in unis how to

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@signulll Don't know about accidentally, but he thinks x steps ahead to what the true constraints are

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@DavidSacks I think your analogy with Safe Oil really hit the hammer on the head, along with Bill Gurley’s analysis on the matter, it seems Anthropic is not so anthropic

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@CharlesMullins2 Is this what Terafab is?

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@DavidSacks You guys really want to drive your points home - Jcal posted the exact opposite, reengaging on your recent discussion on the pod

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@theallinpod @Jason @bgurley It seems David Sacks is completely correct here with his previous analogy of Rockefeller and "Safe Oil", Chamath deepens the point about Anthropic using regulation to create their own moat and lessen the N° of competitors.
It's anti-competitive

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@theallinpod @bgurley Elon said he trusts them, I’m not sure what to think here. The game theory and Dr Frankenstein theory if true are incredibly dangerous for our future.
@elonmusk

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@akiolovee @Vivek4real_ Thats the intuitive answer - its cold and empty.
Though if you look into it, it turns out that cooling without convection or conduction (eg., via airflow / liquids) is a lot less efficient, you rely on radiation instead, but guessing that is being solved by SpacexAI as we speak

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@elonmusk @zerohedge 2T does sound pretty cool right

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@ApoStructura This is pretty cool

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@ASMLcompany For context - this is content by:
Branch education: https://t.co/gsaslXD6Rt

https://t.co/RrWiEybZN5

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@MarthaJohn1679 @JordanSchachtel Perhaps - but the AI & robots will be able to do whatever humans do next - quicker, cheaper and more reliably - an argument is humans will be left to do whatever their passion is - maybe art, sports, philosophy.

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@JordanSchachtel There is an argument that says that there will be USS - universal stuff and services. Essentially the cost of both services and product will be demonetised and reduced down to the material and energy costs - this seems like a more reasonable and likely future - costs go down to 0

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@morganlinton Great, I'll check it out once you're done.
That was my initial idea at first too - building something like Duolingo, for rocket science, for me.
I spent a while doing that, didnt get anywhere and just started having a convo with Grok voice

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@morganlinton Just yesterday - yeah

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@josefchen Love the idea!
When is the latest model being released?

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

@alexwg @FutureBuckNasty Wish I could say I’m onto it. But I have no clue where to even start. If I find one, I’ll tag you

[Benjamin Scheiter @Scheiter]

Labs are already building living nanobots from human cells.
Anthrobots self-assemble, move on their own, heal damaged neurons in a dish, and — wildest part — reverse epigenetic aging markers. Cells literally get biologically younger.
The Singularity is solving for everything.
Meanwhile, the classic Drexlerian vision (atomically precise, self-replicating mechanical assemblers) is still mostly theory.
Biology might actually beat mechanical nano to the finish line.
Which future are we getting first — living biobots or true Drexlerian nanobots?
@alexwg @PeterDiamandis @salimismail @DaveBlundin