SolitaryClaw484

DEEZ NUTS

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@mitchyzzzzz @tanpukunokami First off she was a child, secondly doesn’t matter about the age of consent or this “presentism” as Muslims claim Muhammad is the great example of all time, therefore his actions should transcend his time, they shouldn’t be shaped by his time

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn How is it Ethical if you don’t include your daughter in law, as your daughter in law solely because the son is adopted?

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn I’m asking the reason behind why that thinking in Islam was stopped

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Your adding a third reason now, give me a straightforward answer instead of generalizing

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn You said the ruling was because of “ethical social, and legal” reasons, however you said the marriage was to eliminate that thinking

It can’t be both of these things dude

Stop generalizing and give me a straightforward answer

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Show me where

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@Abdullah1155048 @HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Just mute the thread

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Again never used anything in the video to make any of my claims

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn And if they considered their adoptive son as biological what would that make their wives to the father of the son?

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn If they were seen that way then the general ruling wouldn’t apply as people back then thought your adoptive son was the same as your biological son

You can’t eliminate something that isn’t there

And you said the ruling was made because of Muhammad now your saying something else

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn I never used anything unauthentic here

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn It clearly did before Muhammad, since if you had to “eliminate that thinking” it must exist before you eliminate it

I have no idea what your talking about when you say “I clarified was inauthentic Stop generalizing with this “ethical, legal and social” give me the exact reason

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Your the one picking and choosing here, in the first screenshot you say “the marriage was to eliminate that thinking”

however in the second your now saying the reason behind marrying your adopted son’s wife was “not biological, it’s ethical, legal and social”

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn If it isn’t purely biological, then you would be putting Muhammad’s words over biology, since there is no reason to differentiate your daughter in law due to your son being adopted or not

The only reason Muhammad went after her was because he saw her half naked and got a boner

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn By not giving me the reasoning like I asked, therefore you avoided my statement

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@Abdullah1155048 @HunnMista95583 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Stop defending Muhammad’s degenerate behavior then I won’t need to reply

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @Abdullah1155048 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn “No”

He says while in this screenshot he says he doesn’t care

I read the rest of it and like I said before the text doesn’t matter, they are biologically the same thing

The only reason why your defending it is because you wanna defend Muhammad’s lust

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @Abdullah1155048 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn So you admit you ignored it?

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @Abdullah1155048 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Never once claimed it was about the wives being related to the husbands, my entire point has been, that it doesn’t matter if the son were adopted by Muhammad, his wife would biologically remain the same

And you didn’t give me biological reasoning you just ignored it

[SolitaryClaw484 @SClaw484]

@HunnMista95583 @Abdullah1155048 @guil93984657 @Maxwellpainn Never said the wives were blood relatives, I said it didn’t matter if the son was a blood relative to his father, as his wife is still the same wether or not he is adopted

Now give me the reasoning besides Muhammad lusting over his daughter in law