Scottlehigh

[Scottlehigh @Scottlehigh1]

@KrupnickJon This means that 80% of the people that partook in the study actually completed the challenge, which is the vast majority of the people involved in the movement. This was in fact an effective form of resistance. It didn't work for everyone, but it did for most. #cse252d4days

[Scottlehigh @Scottlehigh1]

Con 1's argument that the 99 Days campaign had no impact was compelling because they backed up their argument with the statistic that this campaign only affected far less than a single percent of the active user base of Facebook. #cse252d4days

[Scottlehigh @Scottlehigh1]

@ThomasBate @KrupnickJon While your logic makes sense, I would argue that making a humane ai is impossible, because that would require the creators of the ai to place value on different human lives, which would introduce the bias of their own morals. #cse252d3laws

[Scottlehigh @Scottlehigh1]

I found pro's argument that LAWS can be used to go to places that are not very accessible to humans to be compelling because it limits the endangerment of humans. #cse252d3laws

[Scottlehigh @Scottlehigh1]

@omc08351214 I think that pro is arguing that the algorithm is not necessarily returning an unwanted result when the result of abortion comes up when murder is searched, because there may be a large demographic of people that connect the two terms. #cse252d2algo

[Scottlehigh @Scottlehigh1]

#cse252d2algo I found Con 1's opening argument to be compelling due to their example of how the 2011 issue of having an abortion site come up when "murder" has been changed, which would indicate that abortion coming up was in fact an error resulting from google bombing.