Not a licensed doctor. Amateur Philosopher. Professional Hollywood screenwriter; fixer of poor story/character. Logically curious. I examine old and new media
All threatrical films from major studios are pre-sold years before production as part of a film release slate (typically in a large multi-picture package). Many of these deals happen during various film markets throughout the year. It is standard operating procedure to secure a films finance (as big studios do not actually spend any of their own money), especially when studios own established IP such as DC, Harry Potter, LotR etc.
People who don't know the industry think everything can be "Batgirl'ed" because it happened once. But Batgirl was never going to be a theatrical release. It was part of a new option in the age of streaming where a studio makes something for internal distribution (their own streaming service or cable channel), and "sell" it to themselves as a first window; essentially a snake eating its own tail.
The goal is that it hits enough to license out to third parties and physical media to bring in additional revenue.
Blue Beetle had a similar production origin, but tested well enough that WBD decided to include it in a theatrical release package they had sold earlier instead of a MAX exclusive. It migrated from direct to streaming to theatrical. Once that migration happened, WBD was legally comitted to releasing that movie in theaters and cannot pull it back without losing the financial stake that slot was worth.
@Scribe_Light@ValliantRenegad Fortunately there really isn't enough content of the current DCU for a reboot to be required. They can adjust to whatever course they want with much greater ease than from previous regimes.
It would surprise me as this movie was pre-sold to theatres, and if pulled, the studio would have to give that money back to all of those markets, which they can’t afford to do.
Simperman? Based on recent events, it would not surprise me if Man of Tomorrow went directly to HBO Max, if this movie ever gets seen at all. It could be shelved. At the very least, expect extensive reshoots.
Today, we Remember those who served and sacrificed for Canada. We wear our Poppies in their honour. We pause in gratitude. We promise never to forget. And through your generosity, we can continue to support Veterans and their families who need our help. Remember their sacrifice. Honour their service. Make a difference. There's still time to support the Poppy Fund. Donate: https://t.co/MRHSII3DI9 Lest We Forget.
According to insiders, David Ellison wants the Justice League as soon as possible.
Jeremy Latcham, the new head of DC Studios, is expected to prioritize heroes like Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, The Flash and more, focusing on more popular characters over deep cuts.
(Source: @TheWrap)
James Gunn and Peter Safran are stepping down as co-heads of DC Studios after four years:
• Marvel Studios veteran Jeremy Latcham will take over as president and chief creative officer on Dec. 1
• Gunn and Safran will “return full time to their creative work” ahead of “Man of Tomorrow,” the sequel to 2025’s “Superman,” which hits theaters July 9, 2027.
• Said Gunn and Safran: “Four years ago, we set out to unite DC under one creative vision. In that time, we helped restore Superman to the heart of DC, while opening new doors and telling new stories in film and television with Peacemaker, Creature Commandos, Lanterns and Clayface. We’re immensely proud of the team that turned that ambition into something real, including the actors, crews and executives we had the opportunity to collaborate with. We’ve shared a creative history with Jeremy going back to Marvel, and we’re eager to see the perspective he brings to DC’s next chapter. We’re excited to return to what drew us to this job in the first place, which is telling the stories we love, including the next chapter of Clark and Lex’s journey in Man of Tomorrow.”
https://t.co/7XO8dZfUIk
@PaulChato@MrTickleTrunk Think of it as a war between French Canadians, Irish Canadians. Throw in the Fenian brotherhood into the mix and the conflict alone would be a good nine for comedy.
@PaulChato@BeautifulCana1 They at least need better insults. Even with the language restrictions in the house, you can still do some brilliant roasting of your opposition.
I'm quite impressed with Cupertino. Episode 2 has quite a kicker; reminds me of an episode of the Good Wife: Bitcoin for dummies - makes sense as it is the same creative team.