Bonjour @edwyplenel et @Mediapart
Après la formidable enquête de votre part sur @J_Bardella et dont je vous félicite pour votre travail de grande qualité et nécessaire à l'intérêt général ✊👏
Est ce que maintenant qu'il est candidat, on peut espérer la meme chose concernant @rglucks1, son passé géorgien, ses amitiés, et surtout ses virées nocturnes?
Parce que c'est un travail nécessaire à l'intérêt général également et les français ont besoin de savoir qui était @rglucks1 dans son passé géorgien
Merci d'avance 🫡
Pour ce qui sont matrixé par leur impôt lors des manifestations je vous invite a écouter cette vidéo
Peut-etre que vous allez enfin comprendre que la répression coûte plus chère que les réels casse
le 17 octobre c’est pour quand j’ai porté plainte pour viol, voilà les questions qu’on m’a posé dans l’ordre, ça contre 1 question sur mes agresseurs pour au final me dire que pour mon bien ils allaient pas envoyer ma plainte parce que c’était peine perdue
Allez, vous avez été beaucoup trop à m'envoyer cette vidéo mdrr.
Et oui, David Lisnard est un énorme abruti qui dit de la merde. La performance sportive a besoin de socialisme pour exister.
Pour gagner, il faut une stratégie de planification dans la masse.
1/6
Félicitations à Raphaël Glucksmann, vainqueur de la primaire de la gauche caviar.
Merci pour la clarification. Un nouveau Macron est possible !
Pendant ce temps le candidat du peuple avance, proposition après proposition. Merci Jean-Luc Mélenchon d'avoir construit une alternative à cette mascarade.
The way a lot of you are engaging with Tao and other mathematicians' concerns about AI is really starting to bother me.
You know nothing about this field. Tao does, to put it mildly.
Have he and other mathematicians always articulated their concerns perfectly? No, but who has?
If top mathematicians say that the journey often matters more than the destination, including as relates to the practical impact of pure math on other fields, maybe you should consider that they could be right.
For my part, it strikes me as very plausible that they are. The years of work human mathematicians might have otherwise dedicated to solving EACH of the problems OAI has solved in a span of months could have launched a dozen other research directions, which could have launched more of their own, which could have launched still more, and so on. Multiply for every previous and subsequent major problem AI has and will solve. You're kidding yourself if you think the same thing is going to happen via mathematicians picking through OAI's solutions in search of understanding after-the-fact, rather than doing the bottom-up work to arrive at them themselves.
What's ironic about the whole situation is that many of the folks mocking Tao are the same willing to engage in wildly implausible speculation about how reward-hacking superintelligences will level the Earth.
Did you ever consider that THIS—what AI is doing to math—is a much more credible candidate for what malign, super intelligent reward-hacking actually looks like?
Unlike genocide via paper clip-maximization, this is happening NOW and many of the people who it is happening TO are telling you in no uncertain terms that it is very bad!
To be clear: mathematicians are not a monolith and you wouldn't be required to agree with them even if they were. But cruelly dismissing their concerns for the intellectual project many of them have spent their entire lives cultivating—when they ALSO have a credible case that automating frontier math is net bad for humanity—shows a stunning lack of humility.
It also shows that many of the folks who claim to care about "AI alignment" are really only interested in the subject if it fits their preconceived, often anti-empirical notion of what alignment problems look like. If mathematicians like Tao are right, then we have what is maybe the first case of catastrophic misalignment on our hands and many of you are responding by ... mocking its most immediate victims?
Hard not to conclude that many of you care more about these issues as vectors for intellectual status-seeking than anything to do with the future of our species.
Everybody’s missing Tao’s whole point.
Imagine an AI-generated cancer drug that’s specifically designed to game the drug trial process.
The drug makes the cancer cells go dormant and changes the way they appear in blood tests and diagnostic imaging, such that they become indistinguishable from healthy tissue.
The drug clears the trial and then only much later do we find out it didn’t work. It probably was also harmful on top of that.
We *already* see AI behave like that when confronted with difficult programming/hacking challenges. This is already reality.
A l'heure qu'il est (10h29 dimanche 11 octobre) aucune réaction de la France au pacte américano russe sur le diesel, et à l'exigence américaine de destitution de Zelensky.
🚨C'est l'occasion de lire cet excellent article du Monde Diplomatique.
Il montre que l'extrême droite française s'inspire du modèle israélien pour imaginer une démocratie à deux vitesses fondée sur la préférence nationale.
https://t.co/DxN66nzHeK
L'Assemblée nationale a refusé de prendre en charge les frais de justice de Sandrine Josso, victime de soumission chimique de la part d'un sénateur. #DirectAN#PPLVSS
very in favor. people focus a lot on whether we can physically break the police but we should remember that we also have to do psychological warfare on them. Our enemies understand its necessity and we should too
@BetterCallMedhi oui j'imagine que tu es d'accord avec la position de Terence Tao.
et ce que tu intuites se verifie dans la réalité, quand tu parlais du voyage, en faitsur ce chemin y a des bifurcations qui mènent parfois à d'autres résolutions.