@BellikOzan@ThePrimalDino@Xoey80239413 Exactly, the whole theme of the conversation was about when we would have a commercially available heavy launch vehicle, which to be frank, the SLS won't be "commercially available" for a while, so no, the SLS, in Bolden's comment, is not real and has not achieved what he said.
@AeroBigMike@spacekoala I don't have enough information to assume the failure was quality control on behalf of SpaceX, I'm not sure if they even manufacture their own COPV's so I can't blame anyone for what happened until we get more info, which i doubt we will have honestly.
@AeroBigMike@spacekoala Need I remind you that starship is a test campaign which is designed to be tested to failure to eliminate flaws before they are a risk mid-flight?
SLS also had it's (although much smaller) test campaign, but I wouldn't be an asshole and say
"this will take humans to lunar orbit"
@spacekoala@AeroBigMike Trying not to be delusional here, as much as I want it to happen I figure those two events will be roughly close to each other, starship will be orbital by then but I'm unsure about an actual full reuse without major heat shield/part replacements
@AeroBigMike@spacekoala Although they are much nothing alike, you saw how the falcon 9 was expendable then got reused a couple times and now they are reusing them rapidly and multiple times, I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume the same is possible with starship
remember "How Not To Land An Orbital Rocket Booster"?
when we get the first superheavy landing on mechazilla we need "How Not To Land A Superheavy Booster"
shit'll be so funny