Former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer (passed 2021) didn’t mince words:
“UFOs are REAL. Multiple alien species have visited Earth for thousands of years.”
He named the star systems: Zeta Reticuli, Pleiades, Orion, Andromeda, Altair.
Some are working with the U.S. government, he claimed, sharing tech like microchips, fiber optics, and advanced materials.
Military has shot UFOs down. We’ve back-engineered the crashes.
Most species are friendly, Hellyer said. Stop treating them as enemies. Cooperate instead of building Star Wars-style space weapons.
One of the highest-ranking officials in history to say it out loud.
Friends… or something else?👽
What do you think?👇
“The enshittification of the internet” is a term coined by author and digital rights activist Cory Doctorow to describe a pattern where online platforms become worse for users over time as companies prioritize extracting more value from their ecosystems.
The basic idea is that many platforms tend to follow a three-stage cycle:
Be good to users
A platform offers a useful, attractive service.
It may subsidize growth, show fewer ads, or provide generous features.
The goal is to attract users.
Shift value from users to business customers
Once users are locked in, the platform prioritizes advertisers, sellers, publishers, or other business partners.
Examples include showing more ads, manipulating feeds, or making it harder to reach audiences without paying.
Shift value from everyone to shareholders
After businesses also become dependent on the platform, the company extracts more profit from both users and business customers.
Service quality declines, fees rise, and the experience becomes increasingly frustrating.
Common examples people cite include:
Social media feeds becoming more ad-heavy.
Streaming services adding more restrictions or price increases.
Online marketplaces raising seller fees while making search results less useful.
Search engines returning more sponsored or SEO-optimized content instead of the most relevant results.
The concept is related to ideas such as:
Platform lock-in
Network effects
Monopoly or market power
Rent-seeking behavior
Attention economics
Supporters of the term argue it captures a recurring pattern in the digital economy. Critics argue it can oversimplify complex business decisions or be applied too broadly.
A concise definition would be:
Enshittification is the gradual degradation of an online platform as it shifts from serving users to serving business interests, and ultimately to maximizing extraction for shareholders.
The term has become popular because many people feel it explains why parts of the modern web—social media, search, marketplaces, and streaming services—often seem less useful, more cluttered, and more profit-driven than they did in their early years.
@ColmanOfGuaire@Cian_Fian They spend their careers striving to get power and when they finally get into office they realize they are powerless puppets controlled by higher entities. 😂
“The enshittification of the internet” is a term coined by author and digital rights activist Cory Doctorow to describe a pattern where online platforms become worse for users over time as companies prioritize extracting more value from their ecosystems.
The basic idea is that many platforms tend to follow a three-stage cycle:
Be good to users
A platform offers a useful, attractive service.
It may subsidize growth, show fewer ads, or provide generous features.
The goal is to attract users.
Shift value from users to business customers
Once users are locked in, the platform prioritizes advertisers, sellers, publishers, or other business partners.
Examples include showing more ads, manipulating feeds, or making it harder to reach audiences without paying.
Shift value from everyone to shareholders
After businesses also become dependent on the platform, the company extracts more profit from both users and business customers.
Service quality declines, fees rise, and the experience becomes increasingly frustrating.
Common examples people cite include:
Social media feeds becoming more ad-heavy.
Streaming services adding more restrictions or price increases.
Online marketplaces raising seller fees while making search results less useful.
Search engines returning more sponsored or SEO-optimized content instead of the most relevant results.
The concept is related to ideas such as:
Platform lock-in
Network effects
Monopoly or market power
Rent-seeking behavior
Attention economics
Supporters of the term argue it captures a recurring pattern in the digital economy. Critics argue it can oversimplify complex business decisions or be applied too broadly.
A concise definition would be:
Enshittification is the gradual degradation of an online platform as it shifts from serving users to serving business interests, and ultimately to maximizing extraction for shareholders.
The term has become popular because many people feel it explains why parts of the modern web—social media, search, marketplaces, and streaming services—often seem less useful, more cluttered, and more profit-driven than they did in their early years.
Treating a minor shift in a trace gas as a 'code red' planetary emergency—while ignoring the massive planetary buffer systems—is a failure of perspective.
The oceans are a vast thermal and chemical flywheel. Because they are so vast and deep, their capacity to absorb, store, and redistribute heat and gases operates on centuries-long timescales. This dwarfs the short-term models of centralised bureaucracies. For example, the oceans contain 86% of the world's global carbon reservoir; yet the atmosphere holds a mere 1% to 2%.
Science itself shows that human-produced CO₂ adds only around 3.4% to the full annual global carbon cycle. But natural climate variation has been enlisted by globalist power brokers to drive a campaign blaming CO₂ for a future catastrophe. The roles of water vapor, clouds and oceans are being bypassed. They don't suit the agenda. Yet oceans cover 72% of the Earth's surface to an average depth of 2.3 miles and contain 91% of all the world's retained heat energy. The atmosphere retains hardly any.
They are so vast that all variations in concentrations of soluble CO₂ are readily absorbed into the marine sink. As oceans warm they retain less CO₂; when they cool, they retain more. This is known as Henry's Law. Natural processes heavily influence how much CO₂ resides in the atmosphere at any given time.
The human contribution, while measurable, is a fractional perturbation within a massive, dynamic system dominated by water vapor, cloud albedo and the sheer thermal inertia of the oceans. This also overlooks the complex, self-regulating feedback of cloud albedo.
As evaporation increases, cloud cover expands, acting as a natural planetary shield that reflects incoming solar radiation back into space—a chaotic, balancing mechanism that a simplified, CO₂-centric model cannot fully capture.
Water vapor is the Earth's most abundant greenhouse gas, making up to 4% of the atmosphere by volume in the tropics. This is 40,000 ppm compared with CO₂ at roughly 420 ppm. Yet water vapor has been minimised by a simplified political narrative because, unlike well-mixed atmospheric gases, it is not uniformly distributed—its concentrations are constantly shifting over the vast expanses of the seas.
We seem to know more about the topography of the Moon than the geography and dynamics of the deep oceans. The tropics and rainforests are accepted zones of peak water vapor. These are also primary zones for storm activities—like monsoons and seasonal rainfall—essential to atmospheric turbulence and heat redistribution.
Basic physics reveals that water vapor and clouds account for a vast majority of Earth's natural greenhouse effect—roughly 70% to 85%—while CO₂ is a minor shadow at around 9% to 12%. Its role is important to the atmospheric mix, but this doesn't mean it runs the world's climate. Water absorbs and traps infrared radiation on a massive scale, playing the dominant role in weather, cloud formation and precipitation.
The 'global warming or bust' agenda minimises the importance of cloud albedo and regional complexity. By flattening water vapor into a simple mathematical slave to CO₂, global models ignore the chaotic, self-regulating dynamics of cloud formation (which reflects sunlight and cools the earth) and localised tropical dynamics.
A decentralised, water-dominated climate driven by regional ocean currents and chaotic cloud formations cannot be managed, taxed or centralised. This offers no financial leverage for global governance.
A well-mixed, uniform trace gas like CO₂, however, provides the perfect metric for a centralised system and a whopping (and unnecessary) $275 trillion grid duplication.
Image: The oceanic flywheel; Deep-sea thermohaline circulation currents that regulate global heat distribution over centuries. Source: ttsz / Getty Images
Mr. Wizard showing ice melting doesn't cause a rise in water levels. It would be terrible if this went viral pissing off all the right Climate Hoax people. Terrible I tell ya!