Search results for western

Let's put aside for a moment that Russians are 'killing' Ukrainian civilians - which is a blatant lie (I don't know what Kiev junta is telling you though, but none of any sources, including your Western boses ever mentions that), let's ask the same question from another point of view. So, you are saying that you are really - really believing, that Russians ('Putin', if it's easier for you), just woke up one morning and thought ',Hey, why don't we send some troops over there, in Ukraine?'. Just like that? Without any reason or cause? God knows they don't need more land, so it must be something else... Hmm... How about when America goes 10,000 km off their shores to defend their (precious)' national security', and Russia - after years of cautioning NATO ' do not come any closer to our borders, do not...' etc. (remember that now dead bitch Albright who said, among other American and Western officials, that 'Russia is too big and it needs to be dismembered'?) - now, when your President - elected on promise to make 'peace' with Russia, and Merkel and Holland publicly said that Minsk I and II were just to buy time for Ukraine to build fortifications and the army - all this and much more were not the things CAUSING, provoking Russia's intervention? You really don't see and understand that? Does not that make sense, or your thesis - 'they just wanna kill us'?! I am not a Russian nor an Ukrainian, but I assure you that this conflict pains me immensely. You were set up.

Your point of view is outdated. Victor Gao is not China’s PR liability , he’s one of the few people who actually closes the dangerous communication gap that has repeatedly led Western countries to misjudge China. For decades, China’s traditional preference for subtle, indirect, and face-saving language left Western audiences with the impression that there was still room to push, test, or escalate. That ambiguity invited miscalculation. Victor Gao deliberately breaks that pattern. He speaks in the direct, unambiguous register that Western audiences actually understand. When he says “if you want war, you will get war” or lays out the nuclear consequences in plain terms, he is not performing for domestic nationalists , he is translating China’s actual red lines into language that cannot be spun as mere rhetoric or empty posturing. His phrasing is precise, not reckless. It removes the interpretive space that previously allowed policymakers and media in the West to underestimate resolve. Far from handing Western media “soundbites,” he is denying them the comfort of continued strategic ambiguity. If you believe that continued subtlety serves China’s interests better than clarity, you are repeating the very approach that has produced repeated Western misjudgments. Gao’s style is the correction, not the problem.