@NinjaSinEspera@claugn19 creo que el problema no es que haya atracción sino que el hombre no respete, insista o se aleje. Que de poder puede alejarse pero es chocante cuando al principio parecía que quería amistad.
Al menos por lo que ella dijo entiendo que esa es su situación y no en si solo atracción
@NinjaSinEspera@claugn19@ArteGrfico2 bueno pero ya diste una clave, a un hombre no necesariamente le atraen todas las mujeres. Lo otro es que la atracción puede ser un obstáculo, pero no un muro impenetrable.
He podido ser amigo de mujeres que me atraen una vez se que no es mutuo
@ArteGrfico2@claugn19 Soy hombre, tengo amigas. Para empezar no todas me atraen, y aun con las que me atraen una vez se que el interés no es mutuo pues ya está la amistad sigue sin apego a algo que no va a pasar.
Lo único es que no dejo cosas ambiguas, cuando ha habido interés lo hablo
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 Yes, as does rough sex. This can work against the man if the woman decides for any reason to claim rape.
Which is why you have to be careful who you sleep with.
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 By the way, why do you keep insulting me when I haven't insulted you?
Why do you have to turn it into an ego battle? Doing that only makes an agreement less likely and leads to a pissing context instead of truth seeking
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 I didn't play myself. I know the rape claim is not evidence, which is why an investigation and trial are needed in the first place.
- The rape claim is not evidence
- CNC claim is not evidence
- "I didn't rape her" claim isn't evidence
No claim is evidence. That is the point!
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 How did I contradict myself?
Them being in CNC doesn't contradict that claiming they were in CNC wouldn't work as evidence... because...
... CLAIMS ARE NOT EVIDENCE.
If saying that were enough then saying "no, I didn't rape her" would also work.
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 I didn't say B's would win the case, that depends on the presence of evidence. What I am saying is that the claim that it was CNC doesn't count as evidence.
B can still lose the case, but it won't be because of the CNC claim.
As you yourself said, words don't count as evidence
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 If that worked, people would use that defense, but it doesn't.
If A practices CNC with B, and B for any reason decides to accuse A of rape afterwards, the CNC claim does not work as a defense.
@BruceWayne977@NarutoGacha1@Schtal2 no, because consented-non-consent is ultimately consensual, rape is not.
CNC is consensual sex where participants are pretending it's not. Rape is not pretended.
Is the difference between nuking a city on civilization V game vs nuking a city in real life.
@Awurabena2@tranirk@MickMilee To use the bible as evidence for the bible is circular logic. WIth that said, I did search, and I do believe in God... but I am not a christian.