@BgansBSV The Credit Card CEO is either lying to anyone listening to him or he's lying to his shareholders as a fiduciary under US law.
If he's lying to his shareholders then he can end up in prison. So...
This timeline sucks. Someone change it back.
Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
I'm not embarrassed to associate with him (in fact I'm honored), and an unwarranted apology tour has never worked for anyone anywhere.
This is war. Man up.
All the forks will hate on https://t.co/TQr2sAEiK9 because it is superior.
Also, once you understand it you can't help yourself but to love it.
The funniest part is that you really can't find a solid argument against eCash (ECX).
Everyone that I have seen try to argue against eCash ends up becoming a supporter.
No intelligent person that actually researches is opposed to it.
Everyone’s on the BSVA payroll.
@BSVAssociation as I have made the case to BSV USA, you need a resident schizo on hand.
My resume includes 8 years of unendingly retarded BSV posting.
Call me.
Because I didn't fork anything.
BTC changed the protocol. BSV restored and preserved the original rules.
Starting a new chain with a new genesis block would have created a different system, not Bitcoin.
The entire point was continuity of the existing ledger, existing transactions, existing ownership records, and the protocol as originally designed.
If you create a new genesis block, you are creating a new asset.
Bitcoin was already running. The objective was not to invent a replacement. It was to keep the original system operating under the original rules.
The real fork occurred when others changed the protocol. Preserving the protocol is not a fork. Changing it is.
I'm American. I feel the lack of access to BSV on US exchanges as much as anyone. But access and liquidity aren't just an American problem. It's a global one, we've known it for a long time, and we're doing something about it.
A lot is happening behind the scenes: exchanges coming on board, in some cases back on board, with real liquidity. Could the Association do a better job of telling you about it? Absolutely. We own that.
Mistakes were made that contributed to BSV getting delisted in the first place. Not all of those decisions were made by the people here today, but the community paid for them, and we have to own them.
A group of people organizing for the good of BSV in the USA, not waiting for someone else to fix things, is exactly the energy this community (and Americans in general!) runs on. I'd love to be part of it.
But exchanges were never the whole point. Bitcoin was never just about speculation, buying and holding, and watching a chart. It's about use. The only way Bitcoin succeeds is if this kind of energy goes into building applications on top of the protocol, things we all want to use and build with. We can't lose sight of that mission.
And let me be clear: the entire point of Bitcoin is that there is no king. By locking the protocol, no single entity can alter the foundation we're building on. Not the Association, not anyone. Nobody needs our permission to build, organize, or fight for it.
The Association is simply people acting in the best interest of BSV, and for the first time, it's run by people who've been in the trenches with all of you. You're going to see a lot more of what that means very soon.
That's why opening twitter and seeing a rebrand push is frustrating. Not because anyone needed to ask us, but because contacting CoinMarketCap and others to rename BSV, without talking to the rest of the people working on the same problems, doesnt feel super productive. Telegram, email, or DM me here. Nobody should be afraid to reach out.
We're also starting working groups where people can build together. An effort like this could live under one of them. Not joining something we run, but being part of something we're all building.
The oldest way to kill a movement is to splinter it. A new name and ticker just tells the world we can't agree on who we are.
We're stronger together. Let's build solutions together.
@ProjectBabbage@JohnLeeCash@coinbase How dare you slandering the man you try to build a fake legacy on his work. Shame on you for putting this words even out of your mouth into existence. This man has sacrificed to the world more then you will ever experience, know and feel. So show some respect.
What has Been Created?
The emergence of digital technologies has prompted renewed debate about the nature of property. Yet before asking whether a digital object should be recognised as property, the common law has always asked a prior question: what has been created? This essay explores why that question may provide the key to understanding digital property without requiring the law to depart from the principles that have guided it for centuries.
The question is not whether the law should change. It is whether we have understood the object before attempting to classify it.
https://t.co/5Q1ww9u1Yp
Oh look, the grifter you called “Crypto President” is dumping on you first chance he gets.
And it started right after 4 random insider wallets opened up MILLIONS of dollars of 40c shorts on BTC.