Among the many benefits homosexuals (and bisexuals) bring society is break-down of gender stereotypes. All women and all men benefit when homosexuals push at the boundaries of the social expectations associated with their biological sex. Often because, unlike other forms of identity, our sexual preferences may not be detected as we often meander between the margins of masculine and feminine. We act as trailblazers for various modes of being within our biological sex. For example, the metrosexual straight male of the 1990s was pioneered by gay men and far more extensive advances for all women were pioneered by lesbians.
The opposite may be true. When biological sex is denied. When erstwhile homosexuals claim that our behaviours are indicia, not of the glorious variability and adaptation of the human spirit regardless of sexuality; but merely of category error – the error of being ‘born in the wrong body’ – and re-emergence of that homophobic sexologist term ‘sexual inversion’ – we narrow down the available modes of living for all members of our biological sex. We send an implicit (if not express) message to other homosexuals, especially the young, that they too have been ‘born in the wrong body’ – given their, likely, meandering between the gender norms – and to heterosexuals, (especially the young) that their own socially acceptable modes of living are more limited than perhaps they first thought.
If we love our heterosexual fellow travellers, and we must, then, let us rediscover what must be an inalienable truth: All men are masculine, by virtue of being men. All women are feminine, by virtue of being women. It is the behaviour in the biology that breaks down the gender norm. Masculinity and femininity do not yet, but must, as concepts, embrace the full range of human experience; so that G.I Joe and Barbie are as equally masculine as they are feminine. After all, G.I. Joe should be made to feel comfortable asking for help when he needs to; and Barbie should be made to feel comfortable solving her own problems when she needs to.
And so, a call to arms: let us homosexuals rediscover one of the many values we offer society. Let us be ourselves. Express ourselves in our natural ways that have always confounded the expectations of our biological sex, and in so doing, create new modes of living for all men and women.
#LGBT
#LGBWithoutTQ
#AdultHumanFemale
#AdultHumanMale
What’s bizarre is if O’Brien is correct, that it is the police’s treatment of ethnic minorities with care that has made people angry, there should be no need for the NPCC Guidance which calls for quote “race-conscious approaches to decision making” focused on eliminating disparate outcomes, like higher rates of stop and search for young black youths.
BREAKING: Even Keir Starmer's Chief Secretary Darren Jones admits he doesn’t have confidence in Rachel Reeves to grow the economy.
Text messages continue to reveal what Labour will tell Peter Mandelson, but refuse to admit to the British people.
What we’re talking about is the object behind words.
And what your crew is saying is a woman is literally anyone who says they are a woman - in other words, that a woman is voice act with no material manifestation.
That is an imposition from you upon humanity as a whole. What right do you think you have to impose that?
You don’t understand Christianity. The point is evil exists in the world because we are fallen. From a philosophical perspective, Christianity encourages us towards the divine (being Christ-like), while acknowledging we can never fully be divine - in other words, safeguards against hubris.
It’s Platonic philosophy, converted into religious doctrine for the masses. Without a transcendental, omnipotent god we’re left rudderless.
The audacity and hypocrisy of this woman are beyond belief.
Hunt laments ongoing “confusion” about sex and gender - which she has done more than anyone else in the UK to create.
She actually says - I’m not making this up - “It is our job to create good law.”
Hunt spent her entire time as CEO of Stonewall undermining the law, creating confusion and above all training public and private sector organisations nationwide to “go beyond the law.”
That meant - break the law. It meant acting as if the UK had sex self-ID. Which it has never had.
But institutions and organisations from the NHS to the police followed her lead. They misrepresented and broke the law.
And this monstrous individual - I’m sorry, I don’t use this word lightly - dares to say, in the House of Lords - in which her presence makes a mockery of our institutions:
“It is our job to create good law.”
How dare she.
How dare she!
Today I have met Lucy, Mark and Katie, Henry Nowak’s mother, father and stepmother. Their courage is extraordinary.
They have endured the most appalling loss, it is a life sentence for them.
They have also faced the agonising decision to release the harrowing body-worn camera footage, knowing how painful it would be and how strongly people would react. They did so because they want truth, accountability and change.
They have asked that we work across political parties and religions to rebuild trust in the police. That trust has been broken because of what happened, and I agree with them on that.
We must also be prepared to examine, carefully and seriously, religious practices or exemptions that permit the carrying of dangerous weapons in public, and other activities that are not conducive to the public good. We also need to examine where the law needs to change.
Henry’s family do not want anger to tear communities apart. They are a family who have friends across faith and race, and so did Henry. His family want his memory to help bring our society together.
Everyone knows I have strong views about how we should deal with equality under the law. What the family agreed with me on is that we need to bring common sense back, and that is what we should all be fighting for.
I promised the family that we will work to ensure there is a positive legacy for Henry out of this tragedy.
That is my focus now.
They use unequal outcomes to imply unequal inputs (biases within the criminal justice system)—then say they need to build-in counter-biases to address it.
It’s called EQUITY.
Why are you denying the most basic of facts? It’s gaslighting.
It would much easier if you didn’t assume we’re all stupid.
@donmcgowan Then why on earth is the government reviewing its racist guidance?
To be clear—nobody benefits from racially conscious policing. The victims of most black crime are other black people.
We need to get back to policing without fear or favour.
https://t.co/FeF7Reo6Km
It’s literally in policy documents to tilt processes in favour of minorities—this is because Leftists insist unequal outcomes is evidence of structural bias in the system.
Yet we only have material evidence of the biased policies. And you have implied bias into the system due to unequal outcomes.