A

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@bacchaus351 @TheElitePundit 😂 ok we can agree to disagree but if that’s your rebuttal I think we know how doesn’t what they’re talking about

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@bacchaus351 @TheElitePundit The team has never been good enough in or out of the champs, we as fans can see that. Performance in one league season doesn’t change that fact. So reducing spending is not justified even if they’ve over-performed.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@bacchaus351 @TheElitePundit It’s like a copy and paste from the minutes of a glazer meeting on why to reduce spending. One year of qualifying for champs doesn’t make those same players better in the same way it doesn’t make them worse when they failed to qualify the following season or the one prior 😂.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@exfootballfan Great summary

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@bacchaus351 @TheElitePundit Look at the figures. Since sir Alex retired we have spent roughly~1.2b when out of champions league vs 800m when in. We’ve been in champs 1 season more! If you adjust by seasons ect it’s like 55%+ more. 55%! Substantially more.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@Shehdhdjdhd @utdHarryy 😂😂 I’m sure INEOS new data led approach will find a way to determine him as a “value” signing.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@bacchaus351 @TheElitePundit Go and check the history books before you respond back. It has happened pretty much every time we’ve been in/out champions league.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@_Utdbaki @fuadyabz23 Baki can you please help fanbase realise that this is Glazernomics inherited by INEOS. Spend big money when we need to get back into champions league and spend fck all when we are back in. We have history of this.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@Robin_W_1 We’re not signing him 😂 these guys are not paying 80m.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@TheElitePundit No. Glazernomics is spending big when desperate to get back into the champions league and spending fck all when we get back in it. Happens everytime, just look at history. Saying they will pay “value” just gives them an option to pass on everyone now who doesn’t cost 35m.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@SullyTalkz Do you know who becomes the top target now Sully? Is it Scott which is most reports seem to be leading towards.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@bacchaus351 @TheElitePundit No. Glazernomics will see us spend big when we need to get back into the champions league and spend fck all when we are in the champions league. Almost as if we were back in the champions league this coming season. Oh wait…..

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@ONTHEMUNY 😂😂 the fanbase have not sussed out that we are back in the champions league and Glazernomics gets involved. Just need to see our signings and money spent when we are out of the champions league vs when we are back in the champions league.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@UTDlegendary Well said!

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@Malachians 😂😂 shall we revisit this in a few weeks? I mean unless you are saying the alternative is a 35m 3rd rate midfielder?

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@SuhailChowdhary And pay 80m? not a chance.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@hesham786 But circumstances have changed this summer. Champions league football. Glazernomics. Spend big when outside of champions league to get back in. Spend Fck all when in the champions league. It’s happened every time.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@hesham786 😂 you’ve caught the INEOS bug. In what bloody world do Real Madrid accept less money than what is being paid to a relegated club for Matheus Fernandes. Have you not understood paying “value” gives them an option to pass on pretty much everyone. Sesko at 80m was not value.

[A @SensibleUtd1]

@utdHarryy It’s alright the board have hedged themselves with his hiring, when things go wrong they know the fans will turn himself and it shields them.