@Black_Pilled@JFGariepy Based on Devon's discussion on the Outlaws Podcast about the Principle Component Analysis graph for genetic distances I've decided use math to end once and for all the "who is White" debate when dealing with admixture. So the standard is you have be as or more related to the White parent than to a random unmixed White person. So For an individual with admixture proportion p from population A and (1-p) from population B, the expected genetic distance to population A's centroid is:
d = (1-p) × D_AB
where D_AB is the distance between the two parental population centroids. So An admixed individual becomes statistically indistinguishable from population A when their genetic distance falls within the natural variation of population A. This typically occurs when:
The admixture proportion from population B drops below 5-10% (roughly F4-F5 generation). So basically around 95% (exactly what Devon guessed) is when admixture dilutes to the same a random White so Nick Fuentes is at least 2 if not 3 away generations from being White despite "looking White." So if @RTTL_Official wants a genetic screening for applicants I'm sure @JFGariepy can refine the model to deal with the large numbers law and cluster structures but we are looking at least 5-6 generations of "bleaching" get back to base level White as general rule.
I'd rather not argue religion. I can do math and see the effects of this practice on social trust and genetic bottlenecks. There's physical reasons why Africans ( polygyny is dominate and parental investment is low hence selection for low impulse control or more instinctual behavior like random violence etc...) are the way they are and why we shouldn't do certain things if we like being alive and staying around culturally and biologically. Europeans and Chinese are the most monogamous and thus are the only truly high Civilizations with the possible exception of Persia which similar in practice despite Islamic allowances.
@Lord_Keynes3 Looks like AA left twitter and is immediately back to being an Austrian idiot. He's arguing that input cost+ markup doesn't matter because subjective value and the infinite potentiality of opportunity cost is somehow reified into value and therefore cost doesn't exist and is purely mental.
It's inversion of the concept of public justice. The idea of jury trail is the normal people NOT "experts" i.e. officials can judge the facts of a case as to the actions of criminals and come to conclusion of guilty or not guilty. The idea POINT is remove the subjective opinions of officials from the process to make it accountable but introducing this "capacity to stand trail" based on some vague expert opinion you've remove the entire POINT which was make the process of justice transparent and public. I want a very simple reform. Any Judge who lets a repeat offender off is convicted for the next offense. Judges MUST be made to share the responsibility for the outcomes of their decision and that way to a just and fair system. You cannot have system were some people constantly make horrible decisions and everyone else has to bear the cost of their ideological insanity from the bench.
Yes. The purpose of trials is the assertation of facts related to the event of a criminal's actions in objective reality NOT subjective psychological opinions of "experts." The very idea that guilt is dependent not objective facts but subjective expert opinions is to do violence to the concept of justice i.e. a person receiving what their actions merit.
He'll spend a few months in the Psych ward and then be released on some kind of probation and then kill someone else and then we'll do it all over again. The very idea of "not guilty via insanity" is de facto the decriminalization of murder. The purpose is stochastic terrorism by the State against the law-abiding to induce a learned helplessness such that there is no revolt against the action of the total state.
Yup. I've tried to explain this "New Deal" era as the original "woke" era and why I consider FDR America's second dictator and it's first socialist one. Putin has NOTHING on FDR. What I'm trying get you remember that the "left" by 1936 had already been organized for 70+ years as the 1st international was in 1864. We have to think in those kind of time length so don't expect our "Russian Revolution" until after 2050.
@Lord_Keynes3 Somebody please block Levin, Loomer, Graham and Kushner from Trump's phone . At this point, He's basically Biden with worse advisors and simply does who ever talks to him last and says stuff he likes. I want the Autopen back.
Yes and no. Prior to WW2 much of left was in fact illegal. They still managed organize above the rightwing see Russia from 1905 to 1919. We don't have a rightwing Lenin for praxis nor a rightwing Marx for theory. I think @GreeneMan6 has talked about this problem and why need culture movement to generate the characters need to start political movement. What is the rightwing vision for the future? In business, what we need a called a "founder" aka someone who sees what the company is in 20 years and what it makes. What exactly is the "rightwing" trying to produce in concrete terms?
Ask this guy to show the post 2022 stats for North Korea you coward or debate @doomernat22. Everyone in economics knows they are currently in their rapid industrialization phase since Kim the younger deciding to open for more trade with China. By 2030, it is going to very obvious that a lot of so called "failure" of "socialism" was just US sanctions and trade embargo during the TINA era. In the multipolar era, with China being the great alternative we will find almost any system can work with necessary technical inputs and a large enough trading partner to bring in the capital flows. By the way South Korea industrialized using centrally planned State production quotas aka "socialism" or in other words this guy doesn't know ANYTHING about developmental economic history of the Asian Tigers.
Stop being crazy supremacists and supporting Israelis invading other countries. Start using genetic testing for schizophrenia and embryo screening to fix their inbred gene pool so we get less insane Jews. I know you don't believe the science of genetics but there's almost no population that wouldn't benefit from screening for serious genetically influence mental disorders like schizophrenia. They can also stop torturing male infants with genital mutilation and torturing animal during slaughter.
@Lord_Keynes3 How is he even daring to show his face in public after that Epstein interview? I'm beginning to think that Eastern Shame culture might be superior to Western guilt culture because our elites seem incapable of either.
You are gonna need a lot eugenics and gene therapy to reach that world. Trade-offs my dude. How much loss of freedom in order "not to be racist" are we willing to tolerate? It seems so far to be 100% as if that's the goal of the concept. As @Rhetordead says "the meaning of a word is it's application in society" and racist is a completely arbitrary term only ever used to limit someone's freedom of association on the basis their politics or identity. Kinda like it's perfectly fine say that supporting Persian majority IRGC forces is "brown coded" but supporting the Mizrahi majority IDF is "White".
I've been away from X for awhile but I couldn't avoid comment on this topic for awhile. You've seem to forgotten the energy economics of Erasmus Peshine Smith (primary advisor for the Japanese Meji era industrialization). It's actually called Power Value theory of value the American school economics because "energy" is misnomer. Energy is your "gas tank size" which nobody cares about but power is the rate at which the engine can put energy into work. Nobody wants an energy efficient car which only drives at 1mph. The American economic history is war between the American Economic School driven by it's engineering and business community and it's Ivy League academic economics who wanted to copy the London School. The American School was essentially erased from our education after WW2 because of it's relationship it's cousin the German Historical School of economics and was replaced the Chicago-Austrian School of Judeo economics (unlimited usury and slavery solves everything style of capitalism i.e. Satanism) which was the rightwing version of the Frankfurt School. I have a lot more to say especially on what currency is and the trade-offs with an energy standard versus today's market demand standard i.e. the "free float." We currently have the most "Free Market" version of a State involved currency possible. No restrictions, No Reserves, only subjective demand requirements underwriting banks creating new currency.