SerenityMatters

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

My dear Stephen,

How lovely to see you marking the sixtieth. One of the darkest days in our history, etched in the memory of the nation, a community of such strength. All true. And all of it happening to somebody else.

Here is the part your tribute left in the drawer. The tribunal found the Coal Board wholly to blame and said the disaster "could and should have been prevented". The Coal Board then demanded £250,000 from the disaster fund to clear the tip that killed them. The fund, raised by public donation for the families, handed over £150,000.

Your party's government applied the pressure, in secret. George Thomas objected, then folded, and leaned on the trustees until they folded too. The Charity Commission sat on its hands. Nobody was prosecuted.

It took thirty years to give it back. In July 1997 Ron Davies, your party's first Welsh Secretary of that spell, returned the £150,000 without interest and without inflation, and conceded the demand should never have been made.

So yes. Remembering is lovely. Your lot billed the bereaved for clearing the mine's own tip.

Twenty three likes. Five retweets. And looking more like your father every year.

Do carry on, pet.

[Gully Foyle #UKTrade @TerraOrBust]

Good morning @SKinnock - I understand that on @bbcquestiontime last night you asked for "just one benefit of Brexit".

Luckily for you, I happen to have compiled a book of 75 tangible and demonstrable benefits of Brexit.

I can pop a signed copy in the post for you if you like?

[The Heartlands Tribune @HeartlandsTrib]

The audience member called it as she saw it, and no amount of political bluster from Stephen Kinnock can change the record.

The Kinnock family built a multi-million-pound career inside the European Union machine. Neil Kinnock served as a European Commissioner and Vice-President, Glenys Kinnock spent fifteen years as an MEP, and Stephen Kinnock himself spent years working for the World Economic Forum and inside European policy circles. That is not a personal slur; it is an economic reality.

When Neil Kinnock was tasked with administrative reform in Brussels, his defining moment came in 2002 with Marta Andreasen, the EU’s chief accountant.

She raised the alarm that the Commission’s accounting system was open to massive fraud, refusing to sign off on accounts she considered fundamentally unsafe. Instead of fixing the books, Kinnock suspended and ultimately sacked the whistleblower for breaking chain-of-command protocols.

The messenger was destroyed to protect the institution.

Establishment politicians often mistake accountability for insult. Dismissing legitimate public anger at institutional self-preservation does not protect progressive values; it surrenders them to the very elites who earned that distrust in the first place.

When working-class voters call out an old boys' network, the proper response isn't outrage; it is an apology.

Look at the receipts: decades on the EU institutional payroll, drawing back-to-back salaries, allowances, and index-linked pensions.

Neil Kinnock lost two general elections at home and was promptly rewarded with a post in Brussels. As a European Commissioner for ten years, he drew a six-figure salary alongside massive executive allowances. When he stepped down, he received a lucrative transitional allowance just to help him adjust to life after office, topped off with a permanent, gold-plated EU pension.

At the same time, Glenys Kinnock spent fifteen years as a Member of the European Parliament. That meant another basic salary, tens of thousands a year in unvouched daily attendance allowances, general office costs, and travel expenses. Altogether, independent research estimated the couple qualified for over £10 million in public pay, perks, and pension entitlements from the European apparatus.

This was not a individual career path; it was the forming of a dynasty.

Stephen Kinnock’s wife, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, followed the exact same trajectory. Before becoming Prime Minister of Denmark, she served as a Member of the European Parliament for five years. After leaving elected office, she stepped straight into the chief executive role at Save the Children, followed by a comfortable rotation across corporate and advisory boards, including Facebook’s Oversight Board.

Her career fits the broader pattern of the modern political class: a seamless glide between European institutions, national governance, NGO leadership, and corporate boardrooms.

Perhaps Stephen Kinnock was right to berate the audience member for calling it an old boys' network almost misses the point. It's not. It's a self-sustaining web where power, influence, and public money circulate strictly among themselves.

Nobody needs to allege that any of them broke the rules. That's precisely the point. Ordinary people can look at a political system in which the same families and networks circulate through well-paid institutions and reasonably ask who that system is really serving.

They didn't build a company, risk their own capital or invent a product. Their wealth came overwhelmingly from careers in politics and public institutions.

So when working-class voters look at the salaries, allowances, pensions and political appointments and call it an old boys' network, sneering at them won't make the question disappear.

The people paying for the political establishment are entitled to ask whether the political establishment has become rather too good at looking after itself.

And, as an aside, while we're talking about rewriting history, let's clear something up about the small boats.

Small boat crossings didn't suddenly begin because Britain voted to leave the EU. Sporadic crossings were reported before the referendum, including around 2014–2015, but they became a significant, organised route from 2018 onwards, when the Home Office began recording arrivals systematically.

Before that, the main route was through the Channel ports and Eurotunnel, with migrants concealed in the backs of lorries. As security tightened around Calais, particularly during the migrant crisis of 2014–2015, those routes became increasingly difficult. The criminal smuggling gangs adapted, and small boats became an increasingly profitable alternative.

And anyone with a decent memory and a conscience will remember the terrible consequences of the lorry routes. In June 2000, 58 Chinese migrants suffocated in a sealed container at Dover. In October 2019, another 39 Vietnamese people were found dead in a refrigerated lorry trailer in Essex, having suffocated and overheated.

These weren't statistics. They were human beings who died dreadful deaths at the hands of criminal smuggling networks.

The methods changed, but the problem existed long before Brexit. Pretending otherwise doesn't change the history, however politically convenient it might be.

#brexit #BBCQT

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

@AngieRayner007 has found this clip from Janice Atkinson in 2018.
Please watch it and you will see a perfect prediction of where we are today. Our then PM was Treason May who betrayed our country in many ways. While in Parliament some of us were blocking her vassalage deal with the EU she was signing us up for unending migration and replacement.
Only @RestoreBritain will reverse this.
Vote @RestoreBritain vote @RestoreBritNWL

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 SHABANA MAHMOOD SURRENDERS TO PARTY RADICALS WITH FAST TRACK CITIZENSHIP FOR REFUGEES

Good morning to every British citizen watching Shabana Mahmood cave completely to her party left wing on the conference stage today. 🤡

The Home Secretary has just announced a brand new scheme granting immediate permanent settlement and fast track citizenship to foreign refugees!

The second Angela Rayner attacked her over the weekend, Mahmood folded like a cheap suit and opened the doors to pander to sectarian voting factions.

Under this scheme, the United Nations will handpick arrivals from Gaza, Afghanistan, and Sudan to receive instant indefinite leave to remain on British soil!

While British families wait weeks for a basic doctor appointment and struggle with crushing taxes, Labour is handing out lifetime state perks to foreign nationals on arrival.

Shabana Mahmood has completely surrendered British border control to unaccountable foreign agencies and radical party activists.

Retweet this immediately to expose Mahmood's fast track citizenship betrayal to every voter in Britain. 🇬🇧🔥

[Mick @MickCo8]

If this doesn’t wake you up
You’re dead inside 👀

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

The UK is blessed with huge reserves of natural resources so why do we suffer scarcity ?

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

Let us start where Labour hopes you never will. The beginning.

Sagal Abdi-Wali arrived in Britain from Somalia in the early 1990s, a child fleeing civil war. Britain took her in. Fed her, housed her, educated her, gave her a council job, a party position, a council seat, and eventually handed her the leadership of the borough that saved her life. She repaid that generosity by presiding over some of the most documented housing failures in London local government history while climbing every rung of the ladder with the urgency of someone who has no intention of staying anywhere too long.

This is not a refugee success story.

This is a masterclass in knowing which doors to knock on.

She went to Leeds University. Did not engage with student politics there, by her own admission. Which tells you something. She was not there to participate in democratic structures. She was there to get the credential and leave. Then SOAS. The School of Oriental and African Studies, specifically its Centre for the International Politics of Conflict, Rights and Justice. If you wanted to design an academic environment purpose built to view Britain as the problem rather than the solution, SOAS would come close to the blueprint. She absorbed it. Then came back to Camden.

Where she got a job. At Camden Council.

The same Camden Council she would eventually lead.

The same Camden Council whose tenants she would later fail on a scale that required a special regulatory investigation to fully document.

She worked inside the machine before she ran it. Learned its habits. Its culture. Its language. Then she volunteered her way into enough charity trustee roles and school governor positions to build a CV that screamed "community champion" while meaning "I am positioning myself and I would like you not to notice."

By 2019 she was Chair of Holborn and St Pancras Constituency Labour Party. Keir Starmer's own CLP. Not elected by the public. Selected by the party. A position built on loyalty to the man at the top, not accountability to the people at the bottom. She publicly praised Starmer as someone the party should be "proud of", declaring her CLP had returned "overwhelming confidence in him." Good girl. Tick the box. Move up the ladder.

She runs for Camden Square ward. Wins with a turnout of 31.8 percent. Barely a third of residents bothered to vote and she squeaked through. In a ward covering one of London's most politically engaged boroughs. The mandate was tissue thin from day one.
Then in May 2024, Richard Olszewski makes her Cabinet Member for Better Homes. Thirty one thousand council homes. Her responsibility. Her portfolio. Her name above the door.

What follows is not incompetence. Incompetence is accidental. What follows is a documented, systematised, institutionally embedded failure of one of the most basic duties a council owes to the people it serves.

The Housing Ombudsman does not launch special investigations lightly. They launched one into Camden. The findings, published November 2024, are worth reading slowly because every line is a person.

One hundred and twenty four findings of maladministration. Twenty classified severe. The highest grade of failure available. A 92 percent maladministration rate for complaint handling when the national average is 84. A 90 percent rate for repairs when the national average is 73. Eighty three thousand pounds ordered in compensation. Two hundred and seventy five enforcement orders issued.

Under her watch, a woman with cancer reported cigarette smoke coming through a hole in her flat. The council said tobacco smoke was "unlikely to be harmful". Under her watch, a profoundly deaf resident requested a British Sign Language interpreter for a property inspection. The council said the budget might run out. Under her watch, a resident on the autism spectrum asked for verbal conversations to be confirmed in writing. The council waited three months and only complied because an internal email noted they were worried about a discrimination claim. Under her watch, a man with PTSD told his housing officer the situation was making him suicidal. He was managed for years and ignored. Under her watch, one resident waited six hundred and five working days just to have a complaint acknowledged. Another waited seven hundred and sixty six working days, over three years, for a final response. The Ombudsman had to threaten enforcement orders to make Camden Council reply to its own constituents.

One case. A resident first reported her problem in 2016. The repairs remained outstanding at the time of the investigation. Eight years. Under the watch of a woman who now wants to go to Westminster to fix housing nationally.

The Ombudsman found Camden trained its staff to filter complaints out. To close them as "not a complaint" with no explanation. To send residents a template letter apologising they "felt the need to complain" rather than apologising for the failure that made them complain. Eight hundred cases a year were being quietly buried as "business as usual." Residents would submit a complaint, receive a reference number, and hear nothing again because the system was designed to absorb and silence rather than hear and fix.

This is what Abdi-Wali built. Or rather, what she allowed to calcify around her while she attended functions and collected titles.

When the council chamber finally confronted her about it in January 2025, she told the opposition to "have some humility." Then she blamed the Tories. Then she blamed a national trend. Then she pointed to the exceptionally high demand of 125,000 repairs a year as though that explained away 124 maladministration findings rather than making them worse. Not once did she stand up and say the words a person of character would say.

She did not say: I failed these people. I am sorry.

She said: you should be humbler about criticising me.

Meanwhile, four thousand Camden residents had signed a petition demanding the council divest its pension fund from companies linked to Israeli arms, including Elbit Systems. Camden's exposure: approximately seven million pounds. The council's response? They hired a King's Counsel who told them that even if international law was being broken, it did not legally compel them to move the money. Technically true. Morally catastrophic. Activists stood outside the Town Hall and told Labour councillors they had "blood on their hands."

Abdi-Wali's council sat on the money and called it a complex legal matter.

May 2026. Election night. Labour loses a third of its Camden seats. The Greens, energised partly by Gaza and partly by sheer Labour failure, tear through the borough. Abdi-Wali herself holds Camden Square by sixty votes. Sixty. In a borough Labour has dominated for decades. Her predecessor Richard Olszewski loses his seat entirely. The party needs a new leader.

Guess who was available.

She did not win the leadership. She survived the election. There is a difference. She became leader the same way a last man standing becomes leader: everyone else fell first.

And what did she do with the position? According to Open Council Network, her recorded activity for all of 2026 before taking the leadership amounts to one Planning Committee attendance in January. One meeting. One. In six months of being a sitting councillor while holding a cabinet portfolio in a council under regulatory investigation.

She was not running Camden. She was running for Westminster.

By September 2026 she had submitted her application for Holborn and St Pancras. Ninety six people wanted that seat. Labour shortlisted three, all from Camden Council, all from the same closed loop. The Camden New Journal noted that rival candidate Camron Madlani was described internally as the stronger candidate against Green leader Zack Polanski. The one more likely to actually win. Labour picked Abdi-Wali anyway. Because this was never about winning the argument. It was about owning the headline. First British Somali woman MP. The story writes itself. The fact that she nearly lost her own council seat by sixty votes, that her housing record had just been forensically dismantled by a national watchdog, that she had attended one meeting in six months, that she would be stepping down from the council leadership after five months to take the parliamentary salary... these were not disqualifications in the eyes of the selection panel. These were irrelevant. The identity was the candidacy.

And then, as if on cue, Reform UK handed her the shield she needed.

Zia Yusuf posted on X that she had been "born in Somalia." Racist. Stupid. Condemned immediately. Even his own colleagues called it nasty. But watch what happened next. The racism row became the story. The housing scandal became a footnote. Tony Diver of the Telegraph called out her record directly and was drowned in the noise. Every subsequent question about her competence was filtered through the racism lens. This is the trick. Not planned by Abdi-Wali, probably. But used by her party with precision. Let the racists overreach. Let their overreach silence everyone else. Walk to Westminster unscrutinised.

Andy Burnham flew down from the north on September 11th to make a "surprise" campaign visit. Surprised who, exactly? Anyone who did not understand that Burnham needs this win and needs this candidate to be bulletproof needs to pay closer attention. This is the same Andy Burnham who handed the Energy Secretary post to Miatta Fahnbulleh, a minister whose ECO4 scheme is currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for forty four million pounds in alleged fraud, who sends all three of her children to private school, who admitted "systemic failure" to Parliament before being promoted for it.

Burnham has a type. Fail forward. Blame others. Never account. Always ascend. He sees in Abdi-Wali exactly what he saw in Fahnbulleh. A loyalist protected by a narrative. A record too embarrassing to defend so they will never be asked to defend it. A career built on the identity rather than the delivery.

And on September 12th, Sagal Abdi-Wali stood at the London Irish Centre flanked by MPs and told the voters of Holborn and St Pancras that housing would be at the heart of her campaign.

Housing.

Not education. Not crime. Not transport. Housing.

The woman with one hundred and twenty four maladministration findings. The cabinet member whose council told a cancer patient her smoke problem was not a health concern. The leader whose staff were trained to filter out complaints before they were heard. The politician who told her critics to "have some humility" while disabled residents lived in homes the council refused to repair.

She is going to fix British housing.

From Westminster. After five months as council leader. Having attended one meeting in all of 2026. With sixty votes to her name and an Ombudsman report sitting in the public record for anyone willing to read it.

Britain took in a child from Somalia and gave her everything. A home. An education. A council job. A party position. A cabinet role. A council leadership. A parliamentary candidacy. A prime ministerial endorsement.

She repaid that generosity by leaving vulnerable people in cold, broken, mould-ridden homes, training her staff to ignore their complaints, telling the people who called her out to have humility, and then pivoting to use housing as her campaign platform with the audacity of someone who has never once been held to account for anything.

The doors kept opening. She kept walking through them. The people she was supposed to serve kept waiting.

They are still waiting.

And Andy Burnham is calling her the future.

He might be right.

God help us if he is.

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 THE CHIEF ARCHITECT OF MANAGED DECLINE: LOOK AT ED MILIBAND'S CATASTROPHIC RECORD ON BRITAIN!

You honestly have to witness the sheer economic vandalism of Ed Miliband to believe it.

Here is the real trail of destruction this eco zealot has inflicted on Great Britain:

*Promised to cut your family energy bills by 300 pounds, but delivered skyrocketing bills reaching 1,723 pounds a year instead!

*Declared war on North Sea oil and gas, crushing high paying British industrial jobs and leaving us dependent on foreign imports.

*Paved over 21,000 hectares of fertile food producing farmland with black solar panels while British agriculture faces a harvest crisis.

*Promised 860,000 green jobs, only for Labour's own think tanks to admit over 90 percent of those permanent roles were a complete fantasy.

*Chose to pander to fringe climate activists while working class families are forced to ration their heating this winter.

Ed Miliband has never created a single penny of real wealth in his entire life, yet he is allowed to dismantle British energy security with zero accountability.

RT and SHARE this everywhere to expose Ed Miliband's disastrous green crusade! 🇬🇧🔥

[Simon Elmer @SimonElmer2022]

Who are the people being escorted into Britain by the UK lifeboat services under the protection of UK police forces and housed in UK hotels paid for by the UK taxpayer, and why are they being brought here? Let’s start with how many of them are coming.

• As of August this year, 16,391 people have crossed the English Channel or arrived by other routes to Britain illegally.
• In 2025, 41,472 people came to Britain illegally by the same routes.
• In 2024, it was 36,816 people.
• In 2023 it was 29,437 people.
• In 2022 it was 45,755, the highest number since figures first began to be collected in 2018.
• In 2021, when the invasion of Britain, not only across the English channel but through UK airports, began in earnest, it was 28,526 people

In the nearly 9 years since 2018, therefore, 209,024 people have come to Britain illegally. To get a cross-section of where these illegal immigrants are coming from at any one time, in the 12 months to June 2025, Afghanis made up the largest number of illegal arrivals (6,360), followed by Eritreans (5,975), Iranians (4,322), Syrians (3,935), Sudanese (3,770), Vietnamese (2,424), Somalians (2,211), Yemeni (2,194), Iraqis (1,900) and Turks (1,543), with a further 7,812 from other countries (Albania, Kuwait, etc.) and 863 unidentified or not recorded. With the exception of Vietnam, these are all Muslim countries.

Over the same period 12-month period, 111,984 illegal immigrants claimed asylum in the UK. In the previous 12 months it was 99,700. One of the questions our government and media has avoided answering is why — if these are refugees — 83% of these illegal immigrants are male, and 67% are between 25 and 39 years old, or what has come to be called ‘fighting age’. As with legal immigration to the UK, these figures have increased dramatically since 2021, with 39,124 people crossing the English Channel illegally between 2018 and 2021. And yet, once again, 87.4% of these were male, and 75% were between 19 and 39 years old.

In Somalia, the average number of children per woman is 6.01. In Afghanistan it is 4.84 children. In Yemen it is 4.5. In Sudan it is 4.13. In Eritrea it is 3.58. In Iraq it is 3.33. In Syria it is 2.7. And in Iraq, Yemen and Syria, under the barbarisms of Sharia law, men can have up to four wives; so each of the men invading Britain could have over a dozen children they have abandoned in their home country.

The other question unanswered by our government and media is why, if these are refugees who have fled war in their home countries, they have travelled through numerous Muslim countries that are not at war, including Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, etc., and the entire length and breadth of Europe to get to Britain, a non-Muslim country?

According to the UK Government, this Sunday, 6 September, 2026, 624 illegal immigrants landed in Britain in 8 boats, but the number of men invading us in a single day has been far higher. Exactly a year ago, on 6 September, 2025, 1,101 immigrants crossed into Britain illegally on small boats from Calais, which was the highest number in a single day in 2025. Even that, though, wasn’t the highest number ever, which occurred on 3 September, 2022, when 1,305 immigrants crossed into Britain illegally.

However — and this is what the media’s focus on so-called ‘small-boat’ crossings has obscured in the perception of the British public — even if this number of invaders, the highest ever in a single day, arrived every day of the year (making 476,325 illegal arrivals) it would still be only a half of how many are arriving here legally, not on the beaches of Dover and Portsmouth but through the airports of Heathrow, Birmingham, Manchester and Bradford. And in actual fact, the highest annual number of illegal crossings was 45,755 in 2022 — although that was closely rivalled last year, when 41,472 crossed into Britain.

Net legal migration from non-EU countries in 2023, the highest number so far in a single year, was 1,005,000. That’s 2,753 economic migrants from non-EU countries, overwhelmingly from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, settling in Britain every day of the year, Monday to Sunday, day after day, 19,326 every week. Even in 2025, when net migration from outside the EU dropped to 350,000, the lowest it’s been since 2020, there were 959 economic immigrants settling in Britain every day of the year, nearly as many as the highest number of illegal immigrants (1,101) ever to arrive in a single day. They overwhelmingly come from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria and Ghana, none of which are at war.

In reality, however, to differentiate these two means of invasion as ‘legal’ and ‘illegal’ is inaccurate, because it is clear that, with a navy, army, air force and special services at its disposal, if the UK Government wanted to stop the ‘illegal’ arrivals they could do so. Instead, not only are our lifeboat services, as we saw this weekend, escorting these fake asylum seekers to our shores, but the Government is then conveying them by coaches — usually, as we saw this weekend, under the cover of night — to hotels and other accommodation paid for by the British taxpayer. Here they are given free pocket money, three cooked-meals a day, free medical care, free access to doctors and dentistry and other benefits that an increasing number of the British people cannot afford to pay for or to which, with the increased burden on our defunded state services caused by the burden of millions of immigrants, we cannot gain access.

In contrast to these luxuries paid for by the British taxpayer, the average time for a Briton waiting for a council home in London is 27 years, and the average time across England is 7 years. In August 2025, there were 6.24 million Britons waiting for consultant-led care by the National Health Service; with the average waiting time 13.4 weeks, around 2.82 million waiting for over 18 weeks, and 180,300 waiting more than a year. In contrast, the NHS has accepted multi-million-pound contracts from the UK Government to send doctors on home visits to hotels housing illegal immigrants.

For the Britons whose taxes pay for these visits, there are 13 million people in England — 28% of the adult population — waiting to see a dentist, including 5.6 million people who tried and failed to get an appointment in the past 2 years; 5.4 million who didn’t try because they thought they wouldn’t get one; and 1.25 million who were put off by the cost. In total, there are about 780,000 people on waiting lists for an NHS dentist.

Finally, while illegal immigrants who have contributed, and will contribute, nothing to the GDP of the UK are receiving three cooked-meals a day, in 2024/25 there were 2.89 million emergency food parcels distributed to 4% of the entire population of Britain, of which 1.02 million went to children. In 2023, at the height of the invasion, illegal immigrants housed in UK hotels were costing the British taxpayer over £8 million a day, or nearly £3 billion per year. In 2025 the cost dropped to 5.77 million a day and 2.1 billion a year. And of the 171,200 illegal immigrants to Britain who had been granted ‘refugee’ status by December 2024, 112,500, 66%, were claiming Universal Credit benefits, all paid for by the British taxpayer.

The widely-parroted claim, therefore, that the collapse of Britain’s public services has nothing to do with illegal immigrants arriving in Britain by small boat is not corroborated by the facts; but is, in fact, a Left-wing myth disseminated by the ideologues of replacement immigration, both the woke-Left and Muslims.

In reality, the men landing unopposed on our shores are refugees in name only, yet they are lavished with every luxury the UK Government can wring out of the impoverished British taxpayer. Once stationed across Britain, they are free to rape our women and children with impunity and to assault and murder our men while we, as we saw this weekend, are arrested by our own police forces for trying to stop them or daring even to protest against the invasion of our country. So what, then, have these 200,000 fighting-age Muslim men been brought here at such immense cost to the British people to do?

Given their age, gender, religion, countries of origin, what in many cases appears to be their military training, and their treatment in Britain, it is clear that they have been brought here for a very different reason than the economic migrants. It was only thanks to a data leak that we learned last year that 24,000 Afghani soldiers have been secretly resettled in Britain. Is it so unlikely that the other so-called ‘refugees’ are any different? In effect — and, I believe, in intention — this is a Muslim army of ‘irregular’ troops stationed across Britain in military barracks emptied of British troops, as they have been in Piddington, Crowborough, Bicester, Barnham, Napier, Wethersfield, Inverness and numerous other military sites. I cannot see any other reason for their presence here, therefore, other than to enforce the Islamisation of Britain by acting as a trained militia in the event of a mass uprising of the British people against the invasion and conquest of our country.

It’s an already observable phenomenon that almost every security guard in every public and privately-owned building in Britain is a foreign national; and although their origins and nationality are impossible to determine, I would guess that they have been placed in such positions by the same organisations and companies that sponsored their transportation here as unskilled, low-paid workers on Migrant Workers Programmes. The same thing is happening in our police forces, which on the excuse of meeting extra-legal Equity, Diversity and Inclusion quotas have for some time now been openly advertising positions exclusively for candidates from so-called ‘ethnic minorities’, even if that means, as we discovered earlier this year, recruiting African child rapists. The same is happening in our security services, which this year advertised internships exclusively for non-White candidates.

Behind its woke vocabulary, this is a programme for the recruitment of hostile foreigners with no allegiance to the British people into positions of authority over the British people. This is being implemented in our government, parliament, civil service, secret services, law courts, police forces, city halls, councils and every other public institution in the UK. What we witnessed on the beaches of Dover and Portsmouth this weekend is only the midway point of a programme for the demographic replacement of the British people in our homeland that continues long after these invaders land and whose goal is the conquest of Britain.

Britain is already an occupied country under foreign control; and unless we rise up now and overthrow this government, parliament, civil service, police force and the deep state of Islamic organisations that are overseeing the Islamisation of Britain, one day soon we will find ourselves hostages in our own country.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER: LEAKED REPORT EXPOSES BURNHAM'S 20 BILLION POUND EU SELLOUT!

Look at the astronomical price tag Andy Burnham is preparing to pay to crawl back under the thumb of Brussels.

A scathing new report by business leaders reveals that Labour's EU reset will fleece British taxpayers for a staggering 20 billion pounds every single year, plus an extra 12 billion pounds in upfront business red tape!

We will end up paying more money to the European Union than when we were full members, but as total rule takers with zero say over our own laws.

While over one million young Brits are struggling to find work, Burnham plans to subsidise European citizens with discounted university fees, free NHS access, and British entry level jobs!

This is not a diplomatic reset. It is the complete economic sabotage of our national sovereignty.

RT and SHARE this everywhere to stop Andy Burnham's 20 billion pound EU surrender NOW! 🇬🇧🔥

[Alan D Miller @alanvibe]

Iceland paid keen attention to what happened to British Fishing Industry

Well done Iceland!

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 A 34,000 POUND HOLIDAY ON YOUR DIME: LABOUR MINISTER CAUGHT FLEECING THE BRITISH TAXPAYER!

Good morning to the millions of everyday, hardworking Brits. Let me ask you a very serious question today.

How many hours do you have to graft to earn 34,000 pounds after the state takes its massive cut of your wages?

Labour Justice Minister Jake Richards just burned through that exact amount of your tax money on a five day VIP trip to America during the World Cup!

He blew 24,000 pounds on flights alone and even dragged along a taxpayer funded personal videographer just to take glossy photos of him at the Barack Obama Centre!

His official excuse is that he was over there studying youth justice. Are you absolutely joking?

British streets are plagued by youth knife crime and Labour is releasing thugs early to save cash, yet this champagne socialist is blowing a fortune to watch the football in luxury!

They freeze your tax allowances, plot new wealth raids on your home, and then use the Treasury as their own personal holiday fund.

They treat the public like an absolute cash machine. The mask has completely slipped!

RT and SHARE this everywhere to demand Jake Richards repays every single penny to the British taxpayer NOW! 🇬🇧🔥

[Gully Foyle #UKTrade @TerraOrBust]

This is...fantastic.

Naughty naughty UK hahaha.

To be fair this could be an hour long, still feel rushed, and still be incomplete.

His one about the UK is also hilarious to be fair. But at least the UK has hundreds of years of history to complicate matters.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Remember, all these countries once had their own culture and traditions prior to Islam.

[Just Right Frank @justrightFrank]

It has taken over 2 years to bring this case to court.
An attempted beheading of a British Army officer who was only saved by the bravery of his wife.
And the Government wants us to all talk about something else?
I think not.
https://t.co/pfSamknRbQ

[Rebel Ada @DearRebelAda]

Islamists threatened Michaela School and its teachers with destruction, and the story is emblematic.

Michaela is the only free, non-selective school in Britain with academic results to rival Eton’s. No sports hall, no grass, no sports field, no car park - no space for a prayer room. So Muslim pupils pushed mobile prayer mats and prayers into the playground, pressurising others to join, intimidating and shaming pupils who did not, causing one girl to leave the choir because “music is haram”, coercing another girl into a hijab. Birbalsingh recognised a culture shift towards religious segregation, and moved to end it.
Teachers confiscated prayer mats, and a Muslim backlash ensued; there was an online petition against one teacher, violence and death threats, racist and misogynistic abuse, and a bomb threat, such that Birbalsingh banned all group prayer. Outrageous and real threats - but not surprising. The Batley Grammar RE teacher and his family are still in hiding, under police protection. Samuel Paty was beheaded outside his school in Paris.

One child, TTT, refused to comply, kept pushing that prayer mat into shared space, and was suspended twice for her rudeness, defiance and for threatening to stab another pupil.
That was just the warm-up. She and her mother, supported by an extended Muslim network crying Islamophobia, took Michaela to court on legal aid.
They claimed Muslim pupils need special treatment because the prayer regime is so exigent, and lost. The court found that banning prayers was proportionate to a legitimate aim, and TTT could change schools if she wished to pray.
The girl had told a classmate that she wanted to harm Michaela, warning, with the stab threat, not to tell anyone. Court upheld that suspension.
She could at any time have chosen a different school, her younger sister too. They didn’t, because they wanted the academic results - just not the discipline and fairness that were integral to them. It didn’t cost them a penny, but was very costly to taxpayers and Michaela’s funds, time and energy.

It is a story which exposes ugly truths about Islam’s destructive potential in Western institutions, and that even children will be used to disrupt the status quo and exert dominance, be taught not to abide by rules or assimilate but to claim special status, space and privilege, and shout, abuse, threaten violence, bombs and death if they don’t get what they want. And exploit the despised colonialist British taxpayer in their drive to bend the world to their wishes.

They got the opposite of what they wanted: a permanent ban on prayer at Michaela, and a warning for every other school.

[Sandy Tregent @SandyofSuffolk]

Retweet please pensioners.

We're being discriminated against.

We deserve more. We deserve better.