Companies don’t have a content problem.
They have an adoption problem.
Over the last 12 months, SRG+ went from concept → shipped product → paying B2B customers:
• 1,600+ users
• 500+ paid
• 8 organizations live
• Built with ~$400K bootstrapped capital
SRG+ is an enterprise SaaS — a system of record for company content, designed for consumption and adoption, not just storage.
Think Netflix for internal training and knowledge.
Learn more: https://t.co/GdqHfV6f4q
#srgplus
My fix: treat Claude as a thinking partner, not an output machine. Shorter exchanges. More dialogue. Let yourself struggle before reaching for the model.
But zoom out and it gets bigger.
Companies are testing 4-day workweeks. Some pushing 3. AI is doing more of the thinking. Output is up, hours are down.
Sounds like a win. But here’s the harder question:
Are we training ourselves to think less? Are we trading depth for convenience, capability for speed?
Productivity has never been higher. Is society quietly getting dumber in the process?
Working with AI made me more productive than ever.
And I noticed something strange: the more I work with Claude, the less I want to work.
Not because the output is bad. The opposite. It’s too good, too dense, too fast.
Here’s what I think is happening:
1. Cognitive flood. Every response stacks frameworks, options, lists. Each piece useful on its own. Together, your brain shuts down. Same exhaustion as 5 hours in Excel without moving physically.
2. Loss of authorship. When the solution arrives pre-packaged, you go from creator to reviewer. The work stops feeling like yours. And with that, the drive to actually ship it disappears. Even when the work is objectively good.
3. No rhythm. AI doesn’t pause. No room to digest, turn an idea over, arrive somewhere on your own. That’s tiring even when the content is light.
The irony: the same tool that 10x’d my output is slowly eating my will to use it.
[Read more in Thread]