Severeth

[Spring Youth @MusingsOfYouth]

https://t.co/g4svmifb0H

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@ETCviperidae @thedragonstea the citrinitas stage is the same as the "cauda pavonis" stage, where it goes through the color of the peacock's tail (which includes blue and yellow)

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@Leaflit Nice boat

[Tom (montalk.net) @TomMontalk]

My new paper on the physics of demons:

🔖 Entropic Parasites: Demonic Entities in the Nested Condensate Model of the Quantum Vacuum
https://t.co/msmUsv7Kq2

[MentisWave 🐍🚁 @MentisWave]

Let us ignore the whole question on if libertarianism is a "rightist" philosophy for a moment.

There is a much more direct question for libertarians who reject Hoppe:

How exactly would you stop a private-city society with RW values from forming without violating the NAP?

The answer, hilariously, is that you must form a libertarian private society of your own and physically remove the Hoppeans. Which means you have become us. You have admitted that we are right. Are you going to physically remove yourselves next?

Either that, or you create a state that bans any form of private cities from existing, in which case you have ceased to be libertarian.

The reality is that society needs some kind of rule of law in order to function and facilitate economic growth. Libertarianism simply replaces that law with a system that is in line with voluntary association instead of by force through a non productive class.

This means there will still be rules. Libertarianism is not when "NO RULEZ". Libertarianism is when society and rule places the NAP first, and if people wish to freely association with other rules such as those that facilitate time preference ( Necessary for a society to last more than 1 generation ) then that is also within the philosophy.

If you think that sounds authoritarian then you must also claim the NAP itself is authoritarian, in which case you have just become a communist but with extra steps. Which considering you included Max Stirner over Hoppe suggests this actually very well may be the case.

Stop being 5 years old.

[Tom (montalk.net) @TomMontalk]

Is humanity ready for FULL alien disclosure? What if the following were disclosed...
#UFOtwitter #UFOx

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@Leaflit No matter how dark the truth may be, in the end it will set you free

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@Leaflit @aidenguoai @yachimat_manga go for it

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@Romy_Holland You have no idea, its not just about the birthrate

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@sish3nfan @Leaflit he just saw it

[Tom (montalk.net) @TomMontalk]

🛸 Earth’s Two Directions

After tracking culture, geopolitics, and alien influences for a few decades, I now hypothesize that:

1) We’re not slated for a total reset back to the stone age like before. Our population is the highest it’s ever been and we’re being culturally & technologically accelerated by aliens. Their investment suggests they have plans for us, or what’s left of us. We’ll see an unraveling & transition rather than a clean wipeout.

2) There are two primary [alien+human] agendas:

Agenda A:

• totalitarian
• parasitic
• sociopathic
• anti-human
• hive mind
• transhumanism
• disinformation
• mind control
• biological manipulation
• loosh farming
• organ harvesting
• genocidal
• atheist / satanic

Agenda B:

• techno-authoritarian
• humanitarian
• discernment
• accountability
• utopian pragmatism
• accelerationism
• prosperity
• sovereignty
• excellence
• eugenics
• deist / Luciferian

Agenda A is clearly the Grey/Hybrid/Reptilian/Mantid (& Negative Nordic) agenda. They see humans as cattle to manage & exploit.

Agenda B appears to be the “positive” Nordic agenda, whatever they actually are (ETs, time travelers, ancient breakaways, jinn, etc). But “positive” here isn’t necessarily positive in the way people think.

Civilizational Terraforming

Consider the tech acceleration curve since the 1800s, the increasingly un-human direction modern life is taking, social media connecting our minds into a network, the Grey hybrid breeding program, or how ET tech/mindset has saturated black projects.

The following picture emerges:

1) Our civilization is slowly being modeled after theirs.

2) There’s competition over which model wins out.

3) Their human & hybrid proxies are doing the bulk of this work.

Why civilizational terraforming? Because our present system won’t survive the coming Earth changes anyhow. It’s too fragile & mired in normalcy bias, thus both vulnerable & unwilling to prepare.

Only the shadow elite & secret societies are preparing, but they are NHI proxies with privileged information.

The rest of humanity can either be left to crumble, or actively transformed into something hardier & more useful to Agenda A & B.

Diverging Catalysts

Note that many societal trends & geopolitical events can benefit A or B depending on their outcomes.

For instance, cultural degeneration of the West can drive it towards hive-mind communism (benefitting A) or trigger an awakening/backlash that propels the opposite (benefitting B).

Since both A and B have the potential to gain, neither would be willing to stop it prematurely. So even “good guys” might stand back & allow certain catalytic processes to play out.

Further, like the military they must factor “acceptable losses” into their strategy. Benevolent intentions require compromise & sacrifice when faced with limiting circumstances.

The Problem with Nordics

Transforming human civilization into a “positive” Nordic civilization per Agenda B therefore isn’t a happy process.

We would lose some of what it means to be human, just like how becoming an adult means losing what it means to be a child. The end won’t be for everyone.

First of all, they have an authoritarian society with more conformity & less privacy than ours. Individuality exists but is harmonized with societal priorities. Everyone has their place, similar to how it is in our military except their psychic nature adds additional cohesion & mutual self-regulation.

Second, they have less genetic diversity than we do because they know genetics & how it relates to personality, intelligence, psychic powers, and the soul. Once you’re aware of that, you don’t just let genetics antithetical to your cultural values & environment propagate unchecked. If we follow in their footsteps, there will be eugenics. Advancements in AI & genomics is rapidly taking us there.

Third, they are mortal & exist in a sufficiently physical state as to require technology. So they’re not fairies or elementals that we’d be emulating in some primitivist back-to-nature way (which is a death sentence since we’d still be physical but now defenceless).

To emulate their system, we would have to undergo major tech acceleration, which comes with major risks to our psychological stability & spiritual integrity. But “God helps those who help themselves,” and tooling up as a planet isn’t necessarily anti-spiritual if done right.

And fourth, they are not angels. They have ethics & spirituality loftier than ours, but as mortals dealing with threats & conflict they’re also pragmatic, intellectual, and thus scientific. This means they’re not the fluffy caricatures the New Age channeling field portrays them to be, which is steeped in wishful thinking & ignorance of how things work in real life.

From a Steiner perspective, Agenda B would be described as Luciferian (or Promethean & Aquarian). As Steiner said, the Luciferian impulse of liberation & transcendence is useful to the degree that it takes us out of our Ahrimanic, materialistic, spiritually blind condition. But beyond that it becomes a spiritual trap.

Stepping Stone Toward Agenda C

Some might therefore reason that Agenda B, while not perfect or ideal, is nonetheless our stepping stone toward an eventual transcendent, spiritual, Christ-like civilization (Agenda C).

Of course, as individuals we have the choice to follow C at our own pace, and through intense spiritual work exit the Matrix.

But can humanity at large accomplish this in the next few decades before black swans destabilize society? I don’t think so. Same goes for shifting to a higher density/dimension.

Timing & feasibility matter as much as the goal, and if the transition toward C takes too long, then practicality dictates “intervening” measures.

Conclusion

If Agenda B advances, be prepared for humanity to face tough decisions, smashing of illusions, overturning of institutions, much heartache from loss of our current ways, erosion of privacy, and the rise of “benevolent” authoritarianism.

These measures don’t have to be driven by ideology or malice, but can emerge out of necessity for planetary survival in the face of existential solar & NHI threats.

After the dust settles, the resulting cohesion, harmony, efficiency, and technological & mental/psychic advancement would bring about a sovereign, self-sufficient, and united world.

At great cost. I wish it weren’t so, but limiting circumstance & rushed time table could make for a difficult birth.

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@Leaflit @BeatoKaine @SilvertheWolfD Here https://t.co/lFX8pm1JKB

[Tom (montalk.net) @TomMontalk]

All logic ultimately stems from pre-logical assumptions. So if you’re going to logically construct a system of ethics, it ought to have something transcendent, intelligent, wise, and divine as its source of pre-logic.

Spirit is that. It’s responsible for conscience, empathy, intuition, introspection, and self-awareness. These source pre-logic that drives reason toward sound conclusions including an objective system of ethics.

This, unlike “reason” (really rationalization) that follows from group consensus, biological impulses, hidden psychopathy, dogma, or utilitarianism (like what maximizes the GDP:calorie ratio for a population).

Those are hylic vectors that drive the spiritually blind toward immorality, moral relativism, or counterfeit ethics prone to degeneracy because they’re built on sand.

“But who gets to determine what counts as coming from spirit?” The answer is: Spirit! through gnostic a priori knowledge.

“But what if someone doesn’t agree?” Then they’re at odds with spirit.

“Convince me!” You either recognize it or you don’t.

“But it’s all relative!” No, it’s objective.

“Then if people disagree, how will it be settled?” In the end, such matters are settled with force.

That’s because there’s no reconciliation between those who see & those who can’t, and it’s up to spirit within the human within society to defend through action what it objectively knows to be right.

There’s no sincere dialogue possible with hylics because each side is coming from pre-logic that’s irreconcilable with the other.

This irreconcilability stems from the one & only genuine duality that exists: light vs. darkness, being vs. non-being, or spirit vs. matter.

Thus, in a shared existence this leads to polarization between those who know & those who can’t due to spiritual blindness/dysfunction.

And so force eventually ends it when such division reaches its snapping point. That’s happened many times in history, usually in favor of the hylics because they are of this world & have the advantage of knowing the terrain.

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@TomMontalk @Hitchslap1 Very well said, thank you

[Tom (montalk.net) @TomMontalk]

All logic ultimately stems from pre-logical assumptions. So if you’re going to logically construct a system of ethics, it ought to have something transcendent, intelligent, wise, and divine as its source of pre-logic.

Spirit is that. It’s responsible for conscience, empathy, intuition, introspection, and self-awareness. These source pre-logic that drives reason toward sound conclusions including an objective system of ethics.

This, unlike “reason” (really rationalization) that follows from group consensus, biological impulses, hidden psychopathy, dogma, or utilitarianism (like what maximizes the GDP:calorie ratio for a population).

Those are hylic vectors that drive the spiritually blind toward immorality, moral relativism, or counterfeit ethics prone to degeneracy because they’re built on sand.

“But who gets to determine what counts as coming from spirit?” The answer is: Spirit! through gnostic a priori knowledge.

“But what if someone doesn’t agree?” Then they’re at odds with spirit.

“Convince me!” You either recognize it or you don’t.

“But it’s all relative!” No, it’s objective.

“Then if people disagree, how will it be settled?” In the end, such matters are settled with force.

That’s because there’s no reconciliation between those who see & those who can’t, and it’s up to spirit within the human within society to defend through action what it objectively knows to be right.

There’s no sincere dialogue possible with hylics because each side is coming from pre-logic that’s irreconcilable with the other.

This irreconcilability stems from the one & only genuine duality that exists: light vs. darkness, being vs. non-being, or spirit vs. matter.

Thus, in a shared existence this leads to polarization between those who know & those who can’t due to spiritual blindness/dysfunction.

And so force eventually ends it when such division reaches its snapping point. That’s happened many times in history, usually in favor of the hylics because they are of this world & have the advantage of knowing the terrain.

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@TomMontalk @Hitchslap1 if the spirit is the source of objective morality, how would you recognize, or qualify it?

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@Leaflit @TaigaxHolic @mattworkman Should games that use royalty free or pre bought assets also have a label? I would say yes, as I would equate them to AI made assets, but im curious to hear what you think

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@xiaocooki @Leaflit Evergreen

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@TomMontalk @SpyroAlderamin @NewsEarnings37 @fringedotcom @s_mera Thanks, I’ll let you know if it goes anywhere

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@TomMontalk @SpyroAlderamin @NewsEarnings37 @fringedotcom @s_mera Reason I’m doing lampblack is because the tar is food for mold/bacteria “white cottony mass”, and its “darker than pitch”, i’ll still be using morning dew for wetting/drying. Calcining the mold would also release ether wouldn’t it? Or is it not the right quality?

[Severeth @SevenSevereth]

@TomMontalk @SpyroAlderamin @NewsEarnings37 @fringedotcom @s_mera Sidenote about the stone- couldnt get pyrite to change noticeably after months of wetting and drying- what do you think about using raw lampblack instead? I am trying that next