Opus 4.7 is one of the worst models out - truly an abomination. No doubt what @AnthropicAI has done is intentional. Opus 4.6 from Jan. was the best thing out there, everything since has been a regression. Can't wait to see the day Anthropic is made obsolete & thrown in the trash.
@melvynx We don't need it to come back, we just need Kimi 2.6 to outperform the original Opus 4.6 from a few months ago and it's game over for Anthropic.
@pvncher@benhylak If true, then that's a major regression, not an advancement. That's something they should have fine-tuned on the BE before release. But given what I've seen from Anthropic as of late, they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.
@pvncher@benhylak I was using max on 4.6 before they nerfed it 3 weeks ago. I agree that it sometimes went off in tangents, but the end results were incredible. I'd happily let it burn through my tokens to wander around the forest at times, at least it produced real results.
@orelohayo @benhylak If you really don't know the answer to that question, you never used the original Opus 4.6 (not that nerfed trash from 3 weeks ago).
@pvncher@benhylak They probably had the 4.7 cranked up to the real max-level thinking while giving us the nerfed "max". I can't believe codex does a better job than this BS.
@claudeai What's the point of this feature? You'll hit your rate limit before you get a chance to open your second session. Now you're just gaslighting us.