Shine °_× faa 🐝

▪️Follow me to get a footprint of 🦋🦋 my virtual life.✨🦋
I believe this year is the year of the DRAGON 🐲

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

How degen are you on-chain? Pull your @Housebets card, find out — and there's something in it for you. @HousebetsWhale drop my card. Use my code: Bets2Won 🃏

[Earnalot @Earnalot888]

Never used an on-chain lottery? Here's the whole thing, start to finish.

Open the Mini App, grab a $1 ticket, watch the contract settle the round and pay the winner.

No forms, no claim step! That's Earnalot!

[Maxxed @maxxedio]

Maxxed Discord is live

Join for a chance to win $10,000

Follow, repost, and drop your Discord usernames to 2X your odds

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

@FastBridgeApp
Tired of wasting time & gas bridging assets one by one?
FastBridge just fixed that.

https://t.co/bynXzctPov

[FastBridge @FastBridgeApp]

Meet FastBridge ⚡

Built for traders, yield chasers, and anyone whose funds are spread across chains.

Combine multiple tokens from different chains, then swap & bridge them in one transaction.

No more bridging one asset at a time 👇

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

@TokenB_Wallet To what extent have you prepared ?

[TokenB @TokenB_Wallet]

🔒 We are fully prepared. Now, we need your verification.

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

@DeepSafe_AI This is actually the right call. Going from O(n²) bridge complexity to O(n) is huge for security. One extra hop through ETH is worth it if it means tighter monitoring and fewer vulnerable contracts. Lombard prioritizing security over UX speed here.

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

On 16 September, Lombard deprecated native minting and redemption of LBTC and BTC.b on five chains — TAC, Sonic, Katana, Berachain and Starknet. Holders on the first four are required to bridge balances to Ethereum by December 10. Starknet keeps its bridge, and its balances have no deadline.

Underneath that sits a second change, and it is the more interesting one.

Bridging moves to a hub and spoke model. From the docs: "every supported chain has a bridge lane to and from Ethereum, and a transfer between two other chains routes through Ethereum rather than directly." Minting from native BTC is unaffected. What changed is how already-minted assets move between chains.

The reason is stated plainly: "Fewer bridge contracts and message paths mean a smaller surface to secure and monitor, and security budget and engineering resources concentrate on the lanes that carry the most value."

Worth being precise about what actually shrank. Not the number of chains — every other chain continues, and you can still mint from native BTC on any of them. What shrank is the number of routes between them.

Those are different quantities. In a mesh, routes exist between pairs, so each chain added arrives with a new lane for every chain already there. In a hub and spoke, a chain arrives with one.

The count that goes in the announcement is chains supported. The count that has to be secured and monitored is lanes. A topology decides which of the two grows faster, and that is the decision this update actually makes.

https://t.co/99C3WipeAW

#DeepSafe #Web3Security

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

Deepsafe AI Random verification

@DeepSafe_Ai #DeepSafe

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

From checking Twitter to using DeepSafe AI cryptographic random verification. This is the final form of on-chain and off-chain security.

@DeepSafe_AI #DeepSafe

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

Twelve deposits. Four minutes. Three chains. One tiny real Bitcoin payment. The technical chain of failures is almost elegant in how simple it was.

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

Symbiosis has published its post-mortem on the Bitcoin Bridge incident of 11 September. The deposit that set the whole thing off was a real Bitcoin payment worth about 25 cents.

The bridge reads deposit instructions from data attached to Bitcoin transactions, and its decoder "identified the sender using the wrong part of that data: a part the spender controls." That was enough to have the attacker treated as an approved depositor and as the bridge administrator at the same time. With that, they put the minimum fee below zero, and a second bug subtracted the negative fee — which added to the deposit instead of reducing it. Twelve deposits went through across BNB Chain, Ethereum and Rootstock in roughly four minutes.

That first payment did not have to be forged. It was real and it was confirmed on Bitcoin. A check asking whether the deposit had happened would have answered yes, and it would have been right.

The bridge was asking a second question at the same time: who sent it. For that, it read a field — one the sender controlled.

Establishing a sender by signature and establishing one by reading the transaction data end in the same place: a name the system is about to act on. They differ in where the name comes from. A signature asks for something nobody can produce without the key the system already ties to that depositor. Reading it out of the deposit data makes the answer depend on which part gets read, and on that part being beyond the sender's reach.

Symbiosis puts preliminary losses to liquidity providers and affected users at 9.97 BTC. The bridge is offline, and it has commissioned independent audits.

Sources:

https://t.co/YxSokEsot2

#DeepSafe #Web3Security #CrossChain

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

@DeepSafe_AI Great breakdown. This clearly shows why reading sender identity from controllable transaction data is still a dangerous design choice.

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

Symbiosis has published its post-mortem on the Bitcoin Bridge incident of 11 September. The deposit that set the whole thing off was a real Bitcoin payment worth about 25 cents.

The bridge reads deposit instructions from data attached to Bitcoin transactions, and its decoder "identified the sender using the wrong part of that data: a part the spender controls." That was enough to have the attacker treated as an approved depositor and as the bridge administrator at the same time. With that, they put the minimum fee below zero, and a second bug subtracted the negative fee — which added to the deposit instead of reducing it. Twelve deposits went through across BNB Chain, Ethereum and Rootstock in roughly four minutes.

That first payment did not have to be forged. It was real and it was confirmed on Bitcoin. A check asking whether the deposit had happened would have answered yes, and it would have been right.

The bridge was asking a second question at the same time: who sent it. For that, it read a field — one the sender controlled.

Establishing a sender by signature and establishing one by reading the transaction data end in the same place: a name the system is about to act on. They differ in where the name comes from. A signature asks for something nobody can produce without the key the system already ties to that depositor. Reading it out of the deposit data makes the answer depend on which part gets read, and on that part being beyond the sender's reach.

Symbiosis puts preliminary losses to liquidity providers and affected users at 9.97 BTC. The bridge is offline, and it has commissioned independent audits.

Sources:

https://t.co/YxSokEsot2

#DeepSafe #Web3Security #CrossChain

[Pytho Dex @PythoDEX]

🚀 PythoDex Airdrop is LIVE!

complete the steps, and start earning rewards

🎁 Rewards are waiting. Don’t miss out!

👉 Join now: https://t.co/17W37ivbmI

#PythoDex #Airdrop #Crypto

[Elyon Chain @Elyon_Chain]

🚨 ELYON AIRDROP IS LIVE

The next chapter of @elyon_chain starts now.

We’re rewarding the community that believes in Elyon from the beginning. ⚡️

🎁 Complete the tasks
🏆 Earn points & rewards
🌐 Become an early Elyon contributor

This is more than an airdrop.

It’s your first step into the Elyon ecosystem.

👇 Join now:
https://t.co/VPckoWNfJa

Don’t wait. Your Elyon journey starts here. 🟣

#Elyon #Airdrop #Web3

[Dustbit @DustbitOfficial]

Available before GTA 6

You ask, we deliver.
Dustbit Boxes just got an upgrade. 🎁

Ready to take a peek?

Start unboxing. Find your next gem.

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

@basis__pro #Basis

@Kokontol5
@Elitcrypto
@Furyama1

[BASIS @basis__pro]

ETH is at its cheapest vs BTC since 2020. Most people are watching the price. Smart money is staking. While markets panic, BASIS users are earning yield on BTC, ETH, SOL, and PAXG simultaneously. Market-neutral. No directional bet. Just structural yield. Start staking on BASIS: https://t.co/jyHxoAZqJB

[Shine °_× faa 🐝 @ShineSU6]

@GuoShenCN7 F9J4iJGTs8ej49zs2uvtFsC4MzdWBsosKBC5WnrMKNAP