She came into his life in 1965, and after that, unnatural deaths of Prime Ministers in India began. The crazy part is that everyone around her who was above her in power or say, anyone who stood in her way of becoming the most powerful died in some kind of accident. Isn't this scary? Brooooo
Sonia Gandhi is a 7-time MP and she never had any social media presence.
Her constituency, Rae Bareli, continues to remain a hellhole after three decades under her watch. I visited Rae Bareli in 2019 for some work and, goddamn, I never saw such destitution in my entire life, even those cursed Asura forests from the Ramayana would look more livable than Sonia Gandhi’s constituency.
No one can ask her anything, no one can say anything, and no one can criticize her for anything. She is beyond accountability and the Constitution.
She finally created social media accounts on Instagram and Twitter last month, not to address the grievances of the people in her constituency but to promote her book, where she confessed to crying over the Babri mosque demolition and the Batla House encounter. This is pure selfishness, vile and evil. Sonia Gandhi is most demonic leader of independent India
Let me ask you…
If India’s Metro network had continued expanding at the pace it did before 2014, how long would the wait be for cities like Pune to have a metro?
YEARS….no…DECADES perhaps.
And that was UNACCEPTABLE.
In 2014, India had just 248 km of Metro lines across 5 cities.
Today, we have nearly 1,200 km across 26 cities.
Over 1 crore people travel by Metro every day.
The impact goes beyond statistics or numbers.
It means less time in traffic, more family time, greater productivity and better opportunities.
This is the transformation we are working towards for urban India!
@doremanpori Brainless zombie spotted. Parliament me apne fav youth leader ka attendance dekh lo 🤣 aur apne pawpaw ki jo tumne dp laga rakhi hai andhbhakt kaun hai uske liye look into the mirror.
Meanwhile the reality behind this: I, big-time loser Rahul Gandhi, can’t debate in Parliament, so I’m inviting the PM to my nukkad natak, where I still won't win. 🤡
Youth of India,
Do you want to see a Rahul Gandhi vs Narendra Modi open debate?
@rajnathsingh ji, @nitin_gadkari ji, @ChouhanShivraj ji, @myogiadityanath ji - you always have the PM’s best interest in mind, please convince him to come.
I promised to investigate judicial corruption and impropriety
Here is the first part
Kashmir hotels, a Dubai-based businessman called Sahul Agarwal, and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: What lies behind a web of commercial deals and payments
https://t.co/rkx6aunwnt
Rahul ji, you ask the Prime Minister to choose a venue for a debate. There is already one: Parliament, where you happen to be the LoP.
Just yesterday, Home Minister Shri @AmitShah offered a special session to debate SIR and EVMs. Why not show the same enthusiasm for a debate in Parliament that you show while issuing challenges on social media?
Demanding answers also carries an obligation to hear them.
There have been several occasions when you and your party have walked out of Parliament while the government was responding to your allegations. How do you claim to be so eager for a debate when you don’t even stay to hear the other side?
It doesn’t stop at walkouts. You and the INDI Alliance have repeatedly disrupted proceedings, leading to entire sittings being washed out. If you are so keen on debating, why not allow Parliament to function in the first place?
And then there’s the mock Parliament you recently held at the Congress President’s residence. Frankly, that was more a ‘mockery of Parliament’ than a ‘mock Parliament’. You found the time and enthusiasm for that exercise. Surely, the real Parliament deserves at least as much.
You speak endlessly about protecting democracy and the Constitution. But that respect should also reflect in how you treat the institutions they have established.
As for the issues you frivolously raise, bring specific allegations and evidence to back them up. Simply throwing together a long list of accusations doesn’t make your case any stronger. As LoP, you are expected to show some seriousness and responsibility.
You say, “Daro mat.”
Then bring the facts, face the scrutiny and stay to hear the answers. In the House, uphold the standards of debate you demand from others.
Maybe lets try to educate my South Indian friends , what was Bihar till 1950's (Before FEP kicked in )
Its southern mineral belt was one of the most important industrial regions in Asia.
In 1951, the Chhotanagpur region of undivided Bihar produced approximately:
82% of India's coal.
57% of India's mica.
46% of India's iron ore.
The entire reported national output of copper ore.
JamshedpurSteel, engineeringTata Steel, operating since 1907
DhanbadCoalMajor national coal-producing region
BokaroSteelPublic-sector steel plant construction began in the 1960s
RanchiHeavy machineryHeavy Engineering Corporation established in 1958
SindriFertilisersMajor fertiliser manufacturing complex
BarauniPetroleum refiningRefinery commissioned in 1964
JamalpurRailway engineeringHistoric railway workshop
How FEP destroyed it?
Why was this disadvantageous to Bihar?
Before equalisation, Bihar had a natural geographical advantage:
Coal was available locally.
Iron ore was available relatively close by.
Steel and engineering industries could benefit from nearby suppliers.
Other factories could establish themselves around the steel industry.
This could generate more jobs, investment, tax revenue and industrial supply chains.
The policy reduced the importance of that geographical advantage.
For example, a manufacturer considering whether to build a factory in Bihar or Maharashtra had less financial incentive to choose Bihar purely because of its proximity to minerals.
Bihar GDP Contribution was 8% to India was among top 5 state economies. UP was first!
When it ended in 1992 , Bihar in next 7 years faced 2 major setbacks. Start of LALOO raj (1990) and State got divided and 85% mineral wealth and Industries went to Jharkhand.