Shutterbug1172

Elite polymath, IQ 153, eidetic memory. Educated,self-taught. Pattern recognition,analytical,lateral,pharma,social,political,physio. Faith in Jesus. 🧠

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

These people are participating in what appears to be a color revolution aimed at overthrowing our current system of government. Those who support it, believing they are pushing for socialism, should question why millionaires and billionaires would support a system that supposedly requires them to give up their wealth to people who did not earn it.

The reality is they do not intend real redistribution. They are steering toward a communist style structure where they retain privilege, status, and wealth while the masses become low wage labor with minimal benefits. By funding protests and promoting ideology, they position themselves for power within the new order after crowds dismantle the existing system for them.

Celebrities and corporate executives pushing this agenda will benefit. The elite class still exists, yet the general population becomes poorer and loses representation because decisions are imposed rather than elected.

This pattern mirrors Hitler’s rise in Nazi Germany, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and the Iranian Revolution of 1979. The ideologies differed, yet the tactics were the same: protests, dehumanization, ostracism, violence, and divisive rhetoric.

Mob intimidation and street enforcement reflect the Nazi brownshirts. Masked groups confronting citizens in public, surrounding cars, blocking roads, threatening businesses, and harassing people wearing political apparel function as ideological enforcement rather than protest.

Bolshevik style destabilization tactics also appear. Occupying sections of cities, declaring autonomous zones, preventing police access, pressuring workers to strike for political goals, and targeting infrastructure and supply chains mirror revolutionary destabilization rather than policy advocacy.

Iranian revolution parallels appear in moral purification campaigns. Public shaming, employment blacklisting, coordinated online harassment, forced ideological statements from companies, and demands that institutions publicly renounce dissenting viewpoints reflect social enforcement of political conformity.

In several cases behavior represents all three simultaneously. Riots involving arson, looting, destruction of private businesses, courthouse attacks, and attempts to prevent normal civic function combine intimidation, destabilization, and ideological purification.

Violence against political opponents such as assaults on rally attendees, attacks on speakers at universities, doxxing campaigns, and attempts to remove individuals from employment for political beliefs demonstrate enforcement beyond lawful protest.

Dehumanizing rhetoric and ostracism also parallel history. Bolsheviks labeled opponents parasites, Nazis labeled opponents subhuman, and Iranian revolutionaries labeled opponents enemies of faith. Modern rhetoric labels opponents fascists, racists, threats to democracy, or people who must be removed from society.

Societies in these movements were divided into irreconcilable groups. Workers versus exploiters in Russia, Aryans versus inferiors in Germany, faithful versus apostates in Iran. Similar division appears today portraying political opposition as existential threats.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@GavinNewsom Yeah you should be first…..

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@RoKhanna It’s odd how this only happens in Democrat ran states……

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@realstewpeters I wonder how much money it took to abandon everything she claimed to stand for.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@martianwyrdlord The Labour Party is openly racist and it has led to a man dying because of the color of his skin.

[John Carter @martianwyrdlord]

Girls locked in dog cages, girls raped by dogs, girls passed around as rape toys at Eid celebrations.

Everyone involved needs to hang.

Especially including the regime anti-racists who enabled all of it.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

You wouldn’t know because you have never been America First. You played a political game by voting a certain way. Not everyone is ignorant…some of us have actually looked at your individual voting record. I wouldn’t vote for someone who believes all Jews should be eradicated from the earth. That’s genocide, and you support it. After all, you supported the leader of the American Reich.

People should really pay attention to what is named on their shirts.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

A innocent man died while being restrained and arrested, all while his murderer walked freely amongst them because the UK police are racists.

@Keir_Starmer you should be ashamed of yourself for being such a racist and allowing the government and local police officers to also be racist. Now because of your racism and innocent man has died all because of his skin color.

I want to express my deep concern about the rampant racism in the UK. It’s unacceptable that the police allowed a man to die and a murderer to walk free simply because of his race. Racism is racism, regardless of the victim’s color.

The UK is clearly grappling with a serious problem of racism right now against white people, and it’s disheartening that a man’s life was lost due to his skin color.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

He plays politics very well. He voted with Republicans on many minor issues, but on major issues such as the SAVE Act, he voted with Democrats against Republicans. When people look only at his overall voting record, it appears that he consistently voted with Republicans, and he knew that is what most people would see. However, when you examine his votes on key legislation, he often sided with Democrats on major issues. AI is only as smart as the person using it. That is how people get misled by headline narratives instead of full context.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@ColinNienaber The people of Kentucky decide who represents them. You do not get to choose who is supposed to represent them.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

When Democrats are upset that Thomas Massie lost, you know that his opponent winning was the best thing possible for Kentucky.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

I don’t know why this surprises anyone. They are exactly what they say we are on a daily basis. That is how their little game works.

There is a quote that people often confuse with Stalin or Marx, but it was neither of them.

“Accuse your enemy of what you are doing, as you are doing it, to create confusion.”

Or:

“Always accuse your opponents of your own sins.”

They never have anything else to say, other than calling us every name they can while claiming they are innocent.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@DrKarlynB You are behaving like a Fascist…..

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

No, he lost because he is a Democrat in disguise. He voted no on issues such as the Big Beautiful Bill, the removal of illegal immigrants, and the SAVE Act. On the most important bills, he consistently sided with Democrats on major policies that voters expected Republicans to support.

If voters wanted a Democrat, they would have elected a Democrat, not someone pretending to be Republican while voting like a Democrat behind the scenes.

The fact that you support him and are upset that he lost his primary tells me everything I need to know about him.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

He voted with Republicans on minor issues, but on the major issues we elected the President to address, he sided with Democrats. He voted no on the Big Beautiful Bill, voted no on the deportation of illegal immigrants, and voted no on the SAVE Act. On the major issues voters cared about most, he consistently voted with Democrats.

He structured his voting record in a way that allowed him to appear America First based on the number of votes, even though many of those votes involved insignificant policies. That gave him the ability to claim he supported the America First agenda while opposing many of the major policies President Trump campaigned on.

He deserves to lose his seat because he is nothing more than a RINO.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

@w_terrence I did my happy dance. He is not America First, and he voted with Democrats on every major issue that we elected the President to address.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

He runs the Democrat Party behind the scenes. He acts as though he was elected president and never has to leave office. His policies were awful, and many people lost their homes because of them.

He does not need to have any influence within our government anymore. He should step away from politics and retire, as he was supposed to do.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

Foreign born individuals should not hold positions in the federal government. In many cases, their loyalty may remain tied to the country they came from rather than to the United States. We have seen examples this year of government officials appearing to prioritize foreign interests over the interests of American citizens.

The United States does not govern other countries, nor are Americans responsible for financing them. Yet some officials push policies that many Americans believe conflict with our Constitution and traditional American values, including socialist or even communist style policies. Government officials are supposed to represent and serve American citizens first.

There is also the concern that foreign nationals could gain positions within our government and influence policy in ways that benefit their countries of origin rather than the United States. Many people view this as a potential national security risk.

For those reasons, I believe that only individuals born in the United States should be eligible to serve in the federal government. Period.

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

It doesn’t make me angry, if white people can’t have their own districts and Latino people can’t have their own districts, then black people shouldn’t have their own districts. It’s segregation and it’s discrimination and that’s against everyone’s civil rights…even black people’s civil rights.

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

🚨Savage digital billboard rolling through L.A. right now:

Karen Bass smiling, shopping, and sightseeing in Africa… while her city burns to the ground with crime, tents, and trash everywhere.

Meanwhile, it shows Spencer Pratt taking out the “basura”

[Shutterbug1172 @Shutterbug1172]

I saw her video on her account, and in the comment section there were hundreds of people posting pictures showing the same mold on their beds as well. That suggests the mold spores may have been introduced at the factory or warehouse where the beds were stored. I say this because every picture I saw in the comment section showed the same exact type of mold across different people’s beds.

If this were a problem caused by each individual home or how each person used the bed, the mold would likely not be the same species. It would more likely be different types of mold from the different environments where each bed was used. The homes where they were used likely had varying levels of humidity, and when that particular mold was exposed to humidity, it created the perfect environment for it to grow.

The bed is basically a thick, overpriced air mattress on both sides that uses plastic tubing to pull air in and out of its surroundings to reach the desired softness or firmness. When it pulls air from the environment and there is humidity present, any mold spores already inside could begin to grow.

If I were someone who bought one of these beds, I would take it apart to inspect it, because it is very possible it is full of mold too.