@michiyalYT @Zandox21 Creo que decir que "tienen una obsesión con estarlo" solo porque hay sectores de la población que defienden a capa y espada derechos fundamentales es algo que no ayuda. Denunciar el imperialismo y el autoritarismo, incluso usando un lenguaje vulgar o poco preciso, es bueno.
@michiyalYT @Zandox21 No les falta perspectiva, para condenar el autoritarismo y la corrupción no hace falta estar bajo una dictadura. En todo caso, decir que no se pueden condenar estas cosas solo porque no se vive su extremo absoluto, es contraproducente.
@braddouriflaugh@thinkerjancy That's the intent but the writing is absolutely atrocious because the characters themselves did seem like they wanted a reassestment of their relationship by building it all over again over healthy bases rather than ending it
@Karoh288 @BoxTwice_ What's confusing about Amphoreous for many people is not the plot; it's actually getting what the plot is because of how poorly written the character interactions are. The bloated and convoluted dialogue just steps all over what could be a pretty good story
@Karoh288 @BoxTwice_ Hard disagree. A "straightforward story" does not move the goalpost so many times while introducing different concepts, characters, plotlines and plot points. While I agree that the plot itself is not hard to follow, the writing is often convoluted, and the length egregious
@Vetrix22 @BoxTwice_ I think that it's really hard to fully engage with the story because most of the elements are completely dependant on what the writers need for their storyline to work, and that can be a good and a bad thing but well...
@NightALight29 @BoxTwice_ There is meaningless bloat in every single storyline. It's more of a general writing problem than a theme that was introduced with Amphoreous