@notinxpacked@KayLFC05_ Better than being sent home in the quarters after sabotaging your team by being sent off tbh, at least last wc was VVD first wc and he lost to the eventual champions
Guys who say we shouldnt be mad at Konate for joining Real Madrid pmo. This was literally him when Trent did only to snake us and do the exact same thing, BIG L and good riddance to you @IbrahimaKonate_
@RizYizzy@LFC_000 Azpi hit the post, the other was a pretty basic save, Mount literally telegraphed where he was shooting. Still had to save it so fair play
@lukes_97@KMacoftheKop@Jayc_Kop But if Chelsea win, despite finishing 6th potentially, Liverpool losing can ensure Villa finish 4th, which could cost 6th place from getting UCL as it in only granted if Villa finish 5th, not 4th
@lukes_97@KMacoftheKop@Jayc_Kop its because of two reasons
If Liverpool win, they most likely finish ahead of Aston Villa( who in turn finish 5th), so granting and extra UCL spot but Chelsea lose out on 3 points to finish 6th
@CfcMerk@KayLFC05_ Yeah at 34 years of age but you have to agree that Palmer is moving like a washed player AT 23 YEARS OLD, he cant even do the basics right and most Chelsea fans where happy to see him substituted today
@StokeyyG2 absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@markgoldbridge absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@adamrowecomedy absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@markgoldbridge absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@yakobper90 absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@Tgarratt10 absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@HLTCO absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@TheOfficialFNG absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
absolutely confused about that dumb ass VAR ruling at the end, and for those that say it was correct, i have a question
If it was 1-1, and City score cause Allison decides to go up anyway, does the exact same ruling occur. Or is it only applicable because City won anyway?DUMB AF
@WilsonCoxLFC Hey man thanks for all the constant update. Just a quick question, will Jacquet be announced like Mama was last season or any official announcement is until the Summer window?