@SlimyFellow@severalnitrogen@chickenperson10@Gaismair I mean poland had invaded the USSR in the early 20s and were very much opposed to the USSR, it seems only logical that they tried to sow dissent and destabilize it
@chickenperson10@Burnished_Gold@Gaismair No, they offered one when the sudetenland crisis happened because they wanted to send a million troops in czechoslovakia to stop the nazis but poland and the ex-entente opposed
@spectreon2nd@0FedKin@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 https://t.co/jTHgObrEcR
Basic explaination of imperialism
https://t.co/avTFJbWwvF
Context around it and expansion
https://t.co/fLkSp1wCpS
Book about the global doctrine of the US
https://t.co/0YYP9SKcDe
More in depth tecnical explaination of imperialism and how it develops
@spectreon2nd@0FedKin@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 Their economy to western interest. Don't be this naive please, read about the jakarta method and the history of the United States and the whole of western capital.
I got better things to do then keep this conversation going, I'll drop a few links on the topic if you care
@spectreon2nd@0FedKin@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 So why do examples like libya or burkina faso exists, where they used their resources for themselves and greatly improved their conditions, and western powers awarded them with invasions and funding death squads to keep them down?
@0FedKin@spectreon2nd@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 They aren't "corrupted" enough to invade, destabilization and imperialism are necessary for the development of late stage capitalism, thus the third world needs to be kept subjugated and subservient to the interests of capital, through soft power like corruption or hard power
@0FedKin@spectreon2nd@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 Not necessarily, in this case it most certanly does, otherwise why would every example of them taking ownership of their resources end up in them being invaded or their leaders being overthrown?
@spectreon2nd@0FedKin@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 And who is corrupting them other than the companies reaping massive profits from the exportation of their raw materials and the usage of their low cost of labour? And also why does any example of them taking ownership of their resources end up in those countries being invaded?
@spectreon2nd@0FedKin@Marafromczechia@KobarLeaflen16 You and I? Duh we're most likely workers who have never been in most of the countriesbwe're talking about. On the other hand, multinational companies and government are the ones corrupting their leaderships and killing the non corrupted ones, hell look at what they did to libya
@janecfra@Rakeshhkumaar Sorry I would normally bring up a counter argument but I'm drained from another conversation, read blackshirts and reds by parenti if you want answers to these question I'm gone bye
@Kosmos_777l@slurpislurp@Chapitalistes@Anarcgambiteiro@AbstrahetsMisha Eitherway this could go on and on, it doesn't make sense to keep arguing with this wall, if you want answers to your questions read das kapital, if you disagree write a critique on it, I'm done with this bullshit have a splendid life.
@Kosmos_777l@slurpislurp@Chapitalistes@Anarcgambiteiro@AbstrahetsMisha Because the profit is made from the surplus value exstracted from the worker, if the company is not making a profit nor firing the worker it's because of the expectation of future profit that makes venture capital invest.