Simon Walmisley

Make Orwell Fiction Again!
Christian, husband, father, business owner, Sci-fi fan, British comedy fan, motorcyclist, gardener.

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

Agreed

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

The New York Times on Father's Day. We do not hate the media enough.

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

Not OK. Blatant discrimination!

[Brian Tamaki @BrianTamakiNZ]

THIS IS BEYOND CRAZY

Trade Depot Ltd is advertising right now on Seek for Warehouse Staff at their Hamilton Superstore.

The job requirement?

“Proficiency in Hindi or Punjabi is essential for effective communication with team members and clients.”

English? Not required.

Kiwis who don’t speak Hindi or Punjabi? Not wanted.

This is blatant discrimination against born-and-bred Kiwis. Kiwis are being overlooked for basic jobs in their own country because they speak English instead of foreign languages.

If we don’t stop this now…there will be no jobs for our kids in the future.

Our youngest and brightest are already packing up and heading to Australia because they can’t get starter jobs…here is a classic example of why.

This has to stop…for the sake of our children and grandchildren.

They should NEVER have to learn Hindi or Punjabi just to land a Kiwi job.

We must keep NZ, NZ.
Kiwi Jobs in Kiwi Hands.
Kiwis First.

It’s long overdue for tax incentives that reward Kiwi businesses for put born-and-bred Kiwis first.

Mass immigration without real assimilation is destroying opportunities for everyday Kiwis. This madness has to end.

What do you think, New Zealand?

Share this. Tag your mates. Demand better.

Our kids deserve a country that puts them first.

#KiwisFirst #KiwiJobsForKiwis #KeepNZNZ

[Holyhekatuiteka @2ETEKA]

🚩There are literally hundreds of Jobs popping up online advertised ONLY FOR INDIANS, e.g Trade depot in Hamilton are looking for a forklift driver -

“OSH Forklift Licence is essential”

and so is :

“Proficiency in Hindi or Punjabi is essential for effective communication with team members and clients”

NZ’s Human Rights Act 1993 and Employment Relations Act 2000 prohibit discrimination in job ads, and hiring on these grounds
• Race or colour
• Ethnicity or national origins.

Language requirement is discrimination. Treating people differently or less favourably because of these traits is unlawful. But I guess Modhi is now in charge of our discrimination laws in addition to our immigration policies.

Indians only hire Indians - everyone knows this.

National/ Labour/Act are determined to destroy us with immigration.

FFS Vote NZFirst

https://t.co/B11yRsRsIn

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

@benonwine Hell be remembered as the great unifier of the British people!

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

@HumzaYousaf @RupertLowe10 I don't think he did mate.

[Matthew Horncastle @matt_horncastle]

I am making a complaint to the Commerce Commission about the Green Party’s claim that “the rich only pay 9% tax.”

This statement is misleading.

The figure is not a normal tax rate on taxable income.

It is based on a broader measure called “economic income”, which includes capital gains, including accrued or unrealised gains.

That matters.

Income is income.

A paper gain is not income.

If someone owns a property, a business, or shares, and the value goes up on paper, that does not mean they have cash in their bank account.

It does not mean they have sold anything.

It does not mean they have received income.

The value could go down again.

It may never be realised.

So when the Greens compare actual tax paid against taxable income plus unrealised paper gains, then tell the public “the rich only pay 9% tax”, they are not making a clean or honest comparison.

They are comparing different things.

A more honest statement would be:

“On an economic-income measure, which includes capital gains and unrealised valuation movements, the effective tax rate is estimated at around 9%.”

That would be accurate.

But that is not the slogan.

The slogan is designed to make people angry.

It is designed to make people believe wealthy New Zealanders are only paying 9% tax on normal income.

That is not true.

Taxable income is not the same as economic income.

Realised income is not the same as unrealised capital gain.

Cash received is not the same as a paper valuation movement.

The Green Party is taking a technical tax calculation and turning it into a dishonest political slogan.

Political parties are entitled to argue for higher taxes.

They are entitled to argue for a wealth tax.

They are entitled to argue for a capital gains tax.

But they should not be entitled to mislead the public to get there.

Words matter.

Facts matter.

If a business misled customers like this, the Commerce Commission would care.

Political parties should be held to the same standard.

In my view, this entire campaign is dishonest and misleading.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

This tweet is about to turn 8 years old

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

I never get tired of seeing this. It always lights up my day!

[Gain of Fauci @DschlopesIsBack]

Australians: “Losing to the US at the World Cup was our most embarrassing moment ever.”

Also Australia:

[Adam Girard (Gilet Jaune) @AdamGirard1990]

URSULA VON DER LEYEN DÉMISSION IMMÉDIATE !
Un député roumain LA DÉNONCE : « Elle a signé 71 MILLIARDS € pour 4,6 MILLIARDS de doses, soit 10 par citoyen ! »
Son mari dirige Orgenesis… propriété de PFIZER. Corruption CRIMINELLE. Arrêtez de nous voler !

[Matthew Horncastle @matt_horncastle]

I am just sending below now

21 June 2026

Commerce Commission
PO Box 2351
Wellington 6140
New Zealand

By email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

Dear Commerce Commission,

**Complaint regarding misleading use of the word “free” by the New Zealand Labour Party**

I am writing to raise a concern about the New Zealand Labour Party’s public advertising and promotional material using the word “free” to describe services that are not, in fact, free.

On Labour’s website, Labour describes several policy promises using the word “free”, including:

* Free Doctor’s Visits
* Free prescriptions
* Free Maternity Scans
* Free Cervical Screening

The concern is simple.

These services are not free. They are paid for by taxpayers.

In Labour’s own material regarding doctor’s visits, Labour states that the policy would be paid for by a targeted tax on certain property profits. That means the cost is not removed. It is transferred.

One group of New Zealanders pays through tax. Another group receives the service without paying directly at the point of use.

Calling that “free” is, in my view, dishonest and misleading.

A more accurate description would be “taxpayer-funded”, “publicly funded”, “subsidised”, or “paid for through taxation”.

The ordinary meaning of the word “free” is that there is no cost. But in this case there is a cost. It is merely hidden from the person using the service and imposed on other people through the tax system.

I ask the Commerce Commission to consider whether the repeated use of the word “free” in this context creates a misleading overall impression for the public.

I also understand the Commission may need to consider whether political advertising falls within its jurisdiction under the Fair Trading Act or other legislation. If the Commission considers this outside its enforcement scope, I would appreciate confirmation of that position and guidance on which agency or complaints body should review this issue.

My concern is not with the political policy itself. Political parties are entitled to advocate for taxation and spending. My concern is with the accuracy of the language used to promote it.

A product, service, or benefit funded by compulsory taxation is not free.

It is paid for by someone else.

Yours sincerely,

Matthew Horncastle
[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

@matt_horncastle Nice. Do you need any other signatories?

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

An absolutely horrific story
A woman sexually assaulted by an immigrant
She begged him to leave
She's trembling on national television as she tells the world what happened

And what did she get for it?

Convicted for inciting racial hatred

Insanity has taken over Europe

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨🚨EL VÍDEO MÁS PODEROSO QUE VERÁS HOY.

D Vance DENUNCIA cara a cara a Von der Leyen, quien está exigiendo censura en las redes incluso con penas de cárcel, que la Libertad de Expresión no es negociable.
La cara de Von der Leyen es un poema 👇

[Unai Cano @unaicano10]

Por un delincuente que falleció drogado paralizaron el mundo, crearon 'Black Lives Matter' y obligaron a todos los blancos a ponerse de rodillas.

Por las más de 250.000 niñas blancas y cristianas raptadas, violadas y torturadas por manadas de musulmanes en Reino Unido, silencio.

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

I don't think so mate...

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

A few weeks apart in NYC:

138 year old Astoria church burns
173 year old Bushwick church burns

The causes of both fires are not known

[David Kurten @davidkurten]

I asked Sadiq Khan if there were grooming gangs in London and what he was doing about it.
He answered by implying the very question was racist and Islamophobic, then I was silenced by the chairman.
(June 2020)

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨🇫🇷 NEWS: A French woman was given a six month suspended sentence and a €3,000 fine after her home was invaded by a Tunisian migrant who sexually assaulted her.

She appeared on national television to discuss her ordeal and said "the main danger for women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men"

The Police then charged her with "incitement to racial hatred"

Her appeal against this punishment is due later today

You have our support @ThaisEscufon 🙏

[Simon Walmisley @SimonWalmisley]

@RightScopee No. Good on him. It's not like he's made anyone else poorer. Quite the opposite in fact.

[Correne - Telford Survivor @Telford_Escaper]

This is my mom who beaten by Pakistani men who want me dead because I spoke out about them raping me from 12 years old.