geldrausch

Freedom: To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing. Freedom is also the freedom to be stupid!

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@grejk_24 Bought one at 0.055 and added one a few hrs ago at 0.175 ETH
Next to Pepe this is one of the strongest internet memes.
Web2 knows it. What else do I hold at these prices?

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

I don’t think you are wrong generally.
But imo we have to be careful in multiple ways.
So many new collections play the IP game.
Most have no name and no following. Nothing wrong with that.
Then a official licensed IP of one of the strongest 18 year old internet meme issues a NFT and everyone is like “be careful”
Then how careful should we be about IPs in the making?

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@thepropgallery No more than in the last 2 years

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@Loym_btc @MartKAD @MontiMania @vibin4crypt0 That is my point. So those other collections either have no real demand (aka community), do not have financially strong supporters or both.
But without one of those (ideally both) no project will be successful

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

Strange take. A community acquires the IP rights for crypto from the artist of what is this:
"The Troll Face isn't just a meme, it’s the 10/10 foundational pillar of internet culture that gave trolling its universal face. Created by Carlos Ramirez in 2008, it evolved from harmless rage comics to the eerie "Trollge" horror phenomenon, mirroring the web's shift from optimism to cynicism. Uniquely, it also broke ground as the first viral meme successfully trademarked, proving digital jokes are real intellectual property. "

Then this community issues under the acquired IP 3333 NFTs and you call that "speculative culture"?
Honestly based on internet meme relevance, this might be one of the strongest official IPs in the whole NFT space.

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@skizdidlyidler @zubic_eth You can read about it here:
https://t.co/bywMLj9OYj

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@MartKAD @MontiMania @vibin4crypt0 Why is that not happening to other collections to drive the price to the same points then?

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@MartKAD There are 2 things that make NFTs interesting.
Either good tech, art or ideas or the floor price of a NFT.
Price is the easiest one to see from outside without needing to read/research a lot.
And with the right ppl in the background, price you can establish where you want it.

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@0x_sammmy @The_sugargirl Just make sure, you follow more hints. Here it was that a project that apparently was "rejected by the official account" immediately got the blue OS check.
How would that be possible if not communicated before.
This was the tell.
Other copycats will not get the check.

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@Arigat0crypto @Tma_420 They might not be smiling in a few weeks looking at their pocket money profit

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

I think the viewpoint is totally wrong.
To mint you need the internet and a wallet plus a few dollars for fees. A profit of 5$ is a lot of money for millions of ppl all over the world. So you cannot really blame them. It is relatively easy money.
You could prevent this with a higher mint price.
But there is another problem. Most of the collections do not have any demand.
So a higher priced mint might not mint out.

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@westaylockedin Locked in

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

Der “invest case” ist, dass immer mehr Geld gedruckt wird, Es aber nur 21 Millionen Bitcoin gibt. Wenn du also 21 Millionen $ auf der Welt hättest und das in Bitcoin abbilden würdest. Dann kostet 1 Bitcoin 1$.
Jetzt drucken wir zusätzlich 21 Millionen $
Die $, die auf deinem Bankkonto liegen vermehren sich nicht, aber wieviel $ ist jetzt ein Bitcoin wert, wenn es 21 Millionen Bitcoin gibt aber 42 Millionen $?
1 Bitcoin = 2$ wenn alle Bitcoin alle $ abbilden.
Der Wert desx$ auf dem Konto hat sich halbiert ( es gibt jetzt doppelt so viele $), der Wert des Bitcoin hat sich verdoppelt.

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@derfachwirt @OrangeManJr Dividende kannst du zahlen, wenn das gehaltene Asset langfristig mehr Return abwirft, als die Dividende kostet. Mehr ist das nicht

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@blury765 Über 500k US$

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@mechanakamoto I saw it dumping from 20k to 3k
Did not matter longer term
When BTC hits a million US$ in ten years, we will think back at today as another opportunity

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@CoinImpulse Ich glaube, wir sind in einem langen Bullenmarkt seit ca 2009

[geldrausch @SimpleSwing]

@nickgiva1 @dotkrueger Imagine you gave me 100$ at Bitcoin 1$ and I offered you 25$ per year as dividend.
If I bought 100 BTC with it, where is my problem?
STRC is nothing else than a bet of Saylor that BTC goes up more year over year than he has to pay as dividends