I’m making this post, knowing I’ll be back to retweet it from my Porsche. 😔
I’ve had my worst struggles this past year and made a promise to turn things around—to start making good 💵, living healthy, and being happier. Now, I can see it all coming to fruition. ALHAMDULILLAH…
This is the best I’ve ever been—the peak so far—and it feels both scary and exciting. But I know I’m still not doing enough, and there’s definitely a long way to go before I reach my dreams. Still, I’m wishing myself the very best.
DINERO 🤲🏾💵
being aware of the content creation process takes the immersion out of watching content creators bc i know she set that tripod first, hugged him, let him go, he waited, moved the tripod to the hallway, she hugged him again, let him go, moved it to the bedroom, he waited, she-
@MTNNG I swear una dey really ment
Una Dey celebrate 25years still network dey go dey come
Tell me why I’m sweating in a ranked match and next thing no network for about an hour
"Misogynistic writing" after it had been clearly stated multiple times that madness is a Targaryen family trait.
Over six kings went mad, but it wasn't misandric writing, but the moment two queens fly off the handle, the writers hate women, they are Nazis and they support Israel
A 19-year-old lady is an adult, and she can marry
A 19-year-old lady is an adult, and she can marry
A 19-year-old lady is an adult, and she can marry
A 19-year-old lady is an adult, and she can marry
A 19-year-old lady is an adult, and she can marry
There’s no constitution anywhere in the world that prohibits marriage for a 19-year-old woman. None.
Medically, a 19-year-old woman is also fit for marriage. Generally, any medical condition that advises against marriage at this age is also applicable at other ages, including advanced ages. There are no established medical contraindications to marriage or reproduction that apply specifically at 19 but not at advanced reproductive ages.
Feminists want the authority of a man.
The privileges of a woman.
And the responsibility of a child.
Sounds like nonsense, doesn’t? YET SOMEHOW THEY EXPECT THIS
Feminism makes no sense today. I mean, it started well but quickly tuned into a culture that lectures men about privilege while quietly depending on their surplus productivity, higher tax contributions, and greater willingness to perform the dirty and dangerous work that keeps the system oiled and lights on.
Feminists keeps shouting that women are still crushed by a male-dominated system, but the numbers in every rich country tell a different story. Women now finish school in higher numbers, live longer, spend most of the money, and file for divorce more often than men. Male suicide rates are 3-4 times higher and workplace deaths are overwhelminglu male.
Feminists turn a blind eye to all these. The higher rates of men dying at work, sleeping on the streets, or going to prison are brushed off as "toxic masculinity" instead of the other side of the same differences that make men take more risks. Society still needs those risks and that extra productivity, yet the same ideology that relies on them keeps lecturing men about privilege. That tells you that feminism is one-sided story that refuses to look at the full picture.
.
Charles Darwin wrote about domestication long before anyone knew what DNA even was. In The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, he basically explained the cheat code: “slight individual differences” are enough for selection to work, and when humans repeatedly choose which animals reproduce, those differences can accumulate over generations. (Cambridge University Press)
Think about that for a second. Dogs didn’t start out as dogs. Horses didn’t start out as the horses we know today. Their ancestors were wild populations containing natural variation. Some individuals were probably calmer, less fearful, more tolerant, easier to handle, or simply better suited to living around humans.
Humans didn’t need to edit their DNA. They just kept breeding the animals they preferred.
Calmer animal → breed it Calmer offspring → breed those Repeat for generations → eventually you have a population genetically different from its wild ancestors.
That’s domestication.
And “wild” doesn’t mean “evil” or “dangerous.” It means the population hasn’t undergone generations of human-directed selection. A wild wolf can be calm. A domestic dog can be aggressive. The difference is in the population’s evolutionary history, not whether every individual is friendly.
The really interesting part is that domestication can change more than behavior. Once humans start selecting animals for particular traits, other biological traits can change alongside them. That’s why domesticated animals can end up looking surprisingly different from their wild ancestors.
But here’s where it gets crazy: humans couldn’t just domesticate everything they wanted.
Charles Darwin himself noted that complete domestication generally works better with social animals that can reproduce under human-controlled conditions. (Cambridge University Press)
Jared Diamond later made the point even more memorable in Guns, Germs, and Steel: “Domesticable animals are all alike; every undomesticable animal is undomesticable in its own way.” (PBS)
Basically, an animal can fail domestication for a bunch of different reasons. Maybe it’s too aggressive. Maybe it panics too easily. Maybe it refuses to breed in captivity. Maybe it grows too slowly, has an inefficient diet, doesn’t live socially, or simply doesn’t tolerate being controlled.
That’s part of why the zebra is such a fascinating case. Zebras are related to horses, but being related to a domesticable animal doesn’t mean you inherit the same “domesticability.” You can tame an individual zebra, but turning an entire zebra population into something reliably suited to human control is a much bigger problem.
So domestication is basically evolution with humans sitting in the driver's seat.
Nature creates the variation.
Humans choose which variations reproduce.
Generations do the rest.
And the wild animal you started with can eventually become something that looks, behaves and lives completely differently.
Idiot.
I don’t blame you.
I blame colonialism in particular.
It was the actions of those very British invaders that led to your rent-seeking dad becoming a billionaire.
They left and transferred their colonial extraction to people like your dad, who now do it on their behalf and share the soils with them.
Once again, you are an idiot.
You REDUCE crime by eliminating POVERTY. The reason so called nice neighborhoods have lower crime rates is because people’s basic needs are being met. It is not because of police, alarm systems, or neighborhood associations. Poverty creates crime.