They're not just punching up, they're punching every direction, and you're all so focused on making sure the people who deserve it get punched that you're ignoring the people you theoretically want to protect.
and that's all 100% deliberate.
It takes a serious lack of critical thinking to miss when a show is playing all sides and think it's in support of your ideals specifically.
they'll nearly make a progressive point, only to couch it in a joke about snowflake millennials.
Some of y'all are way too confident in your assumptions that everyone hates things you hate, and some of y'all are way too easily influenced to conform to hating things based on other people's way-too-confident assumptions.
I can't give a whole in-depth psychological analysis of that herd mentality (certainly can't fit it into a tweet), but I think it boils down to expectation and contrarianism.
I knew people were whining about nintendo, it happens so predictably that it's not even worth listening to, but I didn't realise people were so confident every single switch 2 game was going to be bad.
Bud, I think you might be stupid.
Like, the Wii U wasn't unpopular because it was bad or because of any marketing reasons, it was unpopular because the Wii was popular, and then the Switch was super popular because it did the Wii U slightly better and had all the Wii U games you all secretly wanted to play.
@basedbinkie https://t.co/dC3o1B0K1Y
Eleanor Castus.
I love playing around with the chosen one trope, and the idea she was formerly chosen by a god she's related to is super interesting.
Also, that intense look in here eyes.
@basedbinkie If a dragon's horde is a literal secret, does the dragon then have an incentive to maintain that the secret is true to ensure there's still a secret to keep?
@66sharkteeth I'm voting for Witch Hat Atelier, but I also wanna suggest Even A Replica Can Fall In Love.
I don't know if you vibe with romances, but you've mentioned once you like narrative themes like "Am I a real person, or just a shadow of one?" like KH nobodies. It reminded me of that.
Tired of this "Sid wasn't a villain" nonsense.
Firstly, he wasn't just playing with toys in an unconventional way. Despite not knowing the toys were sentient, his intentions were malicious.
Secondly, he stole and mutilated other people's toys, including his sister's.
Do comic dubbers deliberately read lines out of order to farm engagement from people correcting them, or do people legitimately not know how to read comics anymore?