This happens when you have your own child and you marry someone having their own child.
It is never an easy task for someone to accept your child, especially when they have their own but still Couples need not to target kids in their fights.
Every time I post this video, within the hour, it gets flagged for sensitive content, so we’re gonna keep posting it, Pajeet. Because you stink and the whole world hates you.
Austin Was a Warning. Britain Should Be Listening.
On Sunday morning, a gunman drove past a bar in Austin, Texas, sizing up his target. Ndiaga Diagne was wearing a "property of Allah" shirt and, according to police sources, a vest bearing the Iranian flag. He killed two people and wounded fourteen more before officers shot him dead. The FBI confirmed materials in his vehicle indicated a potential nexus to terrorism, and both the FBI and Secret Service said they were in a heightened state of alert for attacks by Iranian proxies and sleeper cells feared to be embedded across America.
While Westminster was holding a seminar on international law, Iran's network was receiving its signal. This was not a spontaneous act of individual radicalisation. It fits a documented pattern. Iran's doctrine of asymmetric retaliation is deliberate, transnational and well-evidenced. When Trump ordered the assassination of Qassim Soleimani in 2020, Iran plotted to kill both the president and his former national security adviser. When Israeli operations damaged the IRGC's command structure, Iran activated proxy networks across the Middle East. The method is consistent: embed assets, build networks, recruit criminals with no direct ties to Tehran, and wait for the signal. As one former US homeland security official described it: find a neighbourhood, blend in, send surveillance back to the controlling agency, and then there is a go signal.
What should concern British citizens is not just what happened in Texas but that the same playbook is operating on this side of the Atlantic, and it has been for years.
Ken McCallum, the director-general of MI5, used a rare public address to warn of an "unprecedented pace and scale" of Iranian activity inside the UK. Since January 2022, MI5 and police have disrupted around twenty Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens on British soil. McCallum was explicit about the method: Iranian state actors, like their Russian counterparts, make extensive use of criminals as proxies; drug traffickers, low-level crooks, anyone useful and deniable. That is not a British intelligence assessment that differs from the American one. It is the same assessment, describing the same doctrine, operating in the same way on different soil.
Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee, having spent two years reviewing classified material, is expected to conclude that Iran represents a threat to Britain on a par with Russia and China. The IRGC's reach inside the UK will be specifically detailed. Dissidents on British soil are at particular risk. And yet the government still refuses to proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, arguing that doing so would close off diplomatic channels, a position that grows harder to defend with each confirmed plot, and harder still after Austin.
Britain's porous borders compound the risk. Years of inadequate screening and mass illegal entry have created the same conditions Iranian intelligence has exploited in the United States. Iran does not need to choose between smuggling assets across the Channel and recruiting from within. It can do both. Expats with family back home can be blackmailed. Criminal networks ask no ideological questions. Communities where anti-Western sentiment has been left unchallenged offer fertile ground for recruitment. Britain has all the ingredients the playbook requires. It has had them for years.
What Austin demonstrates is what activation looks like. Not a military strike, not a diplomatic incident, but a man in a car driving past a bar, wearing his motivation on his chest. The intelligence services know this model. They have been warning about it. The question is whether the government is listening, or whether it is still, somewhere in Whitehall, checking the legal forms.
"[Ndiaga Diagne] killed two people and wounded fourteen more before officers shot him dead."
WATCH TIL END…
WOW! ONE ACCUSATION. ONE SPLIT-SECOND DECISION. ONE MAN DEAD.
WAS THIS A JUSTIFIED SPLIT-SECOND DECISION….OR A TRIGGER PULLED TOO FAST?
Inside a store in Oakland, a clerk accuses a man of stealing.
Tension explodes. A scuffle. Shouting. Chaos.
Then it stops.
The accused man stands near the door, digging through his bag.
“Check it out!” he says.
In that instant, the clerk believes he’s reaching for a weapon…and fires.
The man is killed.
Now everything hinges on a split second decision:
fear… or fatal overreaction?
IF YOU WERE IN THAT CLERK’S SHOES, WOULD YOU HAVE FIRED…OR HELD BACK?
Crime is a Threat to Road Safety
They killed someone.
In another long video the guy who threw the gun out of the window was calling someone on the phone and bragging about how he made sure he emptied the bullets on an individual and made sure he was dead.
The police were chasing them.
The guy at the back ends up shooting himself.
Looks like his door was child locked.
He knew it was over. Probably did not want to go to jail.
@_ArriveAlive
Chicago: Two teens straight-up fight over SAT scores and who’s destined for MIT.
They’re so obsessed with grades they’re willing to throw fists for prestige.
Guys, chill one goes MIT, the other Stanford. Problem solved, no bloodshed needed.