@News24 Job cuts. More surprising how we still building more shopping mall. Access to smart phones is at 96%. Online sales are still low but things are about to change rapidly. We seating at 10% for now
We are not insulting education. We are calling out book-smart idiots who fail to apply critical thinking despite the PhDs and qualifications they hold.
Some of these so-called “educated” people have demonstrated that education alone is not a measure of intelligence.
History has shown that uneducated intellectuals were capable of helping overthrow the apartheid government.
We challenge everyone, including those who are highly educated. No one is immune from scrutiny or questioning, especially when they promote unrealistic ideologies.
Respect for education is important, but it cannot be a one-way demand.
Educated people also carry the responsibility of demonstrating critical thinking, intellectual honesty, and logical consistency.
When people with qualifications repeatedly make arguments that contradict observable reality or common sense, they shouldn't be surprised when others question the value of those qualifications.
Education earns respect not through certificates, but through the quality of thought it produces.
In many ways the thesis helps explain why Ndlozi often struggles to engage contemporary socioeconomic issues with analytical depth. The same tendency is visible throughout his PhD work. Personal narrative frequently displaces rigorous engagement with competing evidence, alternative explanations and material realities.
That is why we should be cautious about elevating academic credentials above scrutiny. A PhD is not proof of insight. It is not proof of wisdom. It is not proof that one's conclusions are correct. What matters is the quality of the analysis and the willingness to test ideas against evidence.
The danger arises when people mistake academic status for intellectual authority. Scholarship is a living process of challenge, debate and refinement. Once a scholar stops engaging criticism, stops publishing, stops testing ideas in the marketplace of peer review and public scrutiny, their contribution risks becoming academically inert.
Credentials may command attention, but only ideas can earn respect. And ideas that are insulated from challenge eventually become dogma rather than scholarship. The public should judge arguments on their merits, not on the titles that precede someone's name.