@kaitodan its worse than common sense, all of CT has been shouting at founders since the dawn of the first airdrop about this stuff and they refuse to listen
ignorance + lack of common sense
this is the airdrop formula to succeed imo
the problem is most founders...take any testnet for example; garbage apps that nobody wants to use in the first place.
then, they incentivizing users to use this garbage they don't want to or enjoy and to top it off, they then blaming them for farming.
if you had good apps, people would come back. period. if you had good apps, people would want to buy, period.
everybody wants to try something new that's good. everybody wants something thats fun, or will improve their life. end of story.
If founders reframed their mind to:
"Hey we can get THOUSANDS of users, we need to MAKE SURE that they love every single f*king app and not the airdrop, that they never want to leave"
THEN
You take what luca said https://t.co/pl5fmPIyRq yesterday, and add that to the formula, and this is how you make them work.
Although I think Ansem did this strategy by accident.
it does highlight a path.
I think Ansems plan was no plan, and God blessed him with doing every move correct and a new type of airdrop strategy which came from not knowing how to airdrop people correctly but wanting to, which caused the delay / continious airdrop innovation.
I think he has a plan now, a lot of plans. But it stemmed from noplan originally, is my speculation.
This is the airdrop formula, inspirted by @jessepollak
if you failed at making airdrop farmers valuable, that's a responsibility you / FOUNDERS need to take responsibility for.
Not blame them.