This is the core idea behind Mure:
Enterprise transactions should not end with “funds moved.” They should end with the intended business outcome executed correctly. Who receives value, in what currency, under which rules, with records the business can actually use.
That is the layer we are building at @mureapp .
Enterprise value transfer only works when businesses can trust the outcome.
Funds reach the intended counterparty. In the expected currency. Under the agreed commercial rules. With clear, usable records.
⬇️This is how most infrastructure stops before that outcome is complete.
It moves funds but leaves the commercial logic to be assembled downstream, meaning...
... Currency rules sit in one system
... Counterparty preferences sit in another
... Approvals happen elsewhere
Reporting gets cleaned up later.
Reconciliation turns into a finance problem after payment execution, making enterprise payment workflows quickly become expensive, slow and difficult to trust.
This is why we built Mure.
Mure is the programmable orchestration layer for global enterprise value transfer.
A business defines the preferred settlement outcome.
Mure coordinates routing, conversion, conditions, counterparties, settlement preferences, and reporting inside one transaction flow.
Through programmable orchestration, businesses can:
▫️Compress settlement workflows from days or weeks to near-instant execution
▫️Lower transaction management costs from fewer handoffs, manual checks, and exception workflows
▫️Enforce conditions, splits, approvals, and settlement rules as part of the transaction itself
▫️Create cleaner audit trails by keeping approvals, routing decisions, release conditions, and settlement records connected to the transaction
Define any outcome.
Mure orchestrates the full transaction.
We look like dead of february Arsenal again. Slow, slow, slow, and sloppy. Painful to watch #arsenal the left back and right back position is now a huge issue
Companies starting to reward employees for “AI usage” but:
More tokens ≠ more output
More AI ≠ more revenue
All you get is people optimizing for usage instead of results. at some point, the “you gotta use more AI” narrative sounds a lot like “help us automate and replace you”. I’m all for AI but grand scheme of things, future looks scary af
@JTRIndy @TechLayoffLover True but cutting headcount increases profit for one company. When everyone does it, you remove the customers and any system still needs buyers imo.
AI / robotics promise a world where we produce everything with very few people. But life doesn’t just run on production it runs on people having money to buy things. Can have trillion AI agents, if there is no purchasing power, there is nothing for them to buy with. Don’t add up.
@mdudas This is omitting on/off ramp fees (likely on-ramp only), bridge fees (Solana is very specific in the grand scheme of things and also non-evm), and agent fees (they ain’t free). these transactions will still be relatively cheaper (1.5%ish) but can’t say they will be near zero