Some wonder why Maga is disappointed with Amy Coney Barrett👩⚖️⚖️
Here's why:
She lied to Trump.
She lied to the Senate confirmation committee.
She lied to Republicans.
She lied to Maga.
She lied to the American people.
Despite her assurances & testimony, she was no conservative—she was & is a liberal wolf in sheep's clothing.
SHAME on her.
The biggest clown of the filmers is going to jail again. LOVE THIS SO MUCH. GREAT JOB GUYS JAIL THEM ALL . put him in a re-education camp like they do in China
Game Warden Demands Sailboat "Propulsion Test" on a Dead Calm Day
Zero wind, flat water, no ripples, but the officer swears there's 8 knots and insists on the test anyway. The captain's face says it all. Classic bureaucracy meets reality. Who's right here?
What do you think, ticket or common sense? 🇺🇸
If we had a righteous military on Midgard-Earth and everything was not White Hat/Black Hat Annunaki-Archon controlled opposition this Etheric Manipulation device would be destroyed and natural ascension would occur⚓️⚓️⚓️
@Breaking57 I bet he can rattle off the name of every Krispy Kreme doughnut but doesn't know what it means when somebody makes reference to the Fourth amendment of the Constitution!
"What Constitution?", lol, where do they find such brain dead officers?
"They've silenced her.
"This is an attempt to punish someone who spoke the truth."
The "bizarre" moment @maitlis is forced to ask Facebook whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams to leave the studio.
The author of the 14th Amendment:
"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens..."
The SCOTUS didn't just go against President Trump, they went against the Constitution.
🚨 SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO ON THE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING: “In my judgment, the court has made a mistake that will seriously affect the country's future.
Suppose that a person's only connection to this country is that he was born here to a mother who was present just long enough to give birth and then quickly return to her native country.
Suppose that country is a strategic adversary or enemy of the United States. Suppose the child NEVER visited the United States while grow and was inculcated with hatred of this country.
According to this court, now, that person is a citizen of the United States. He can enter and leave the country as he pleases. He can travel the world on a United States passport.
Even if he plots to harm this country, he cannot be deprived of his status as a citizen, at least under current precedent.”
🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Recovered footage from a 2004 ABC segment shows Kamala Harris, actively working with the Santa Barbra police trying to destroy Michael Jackson’s life and send him to jail while Donald Trump defended Michael.
Michael Jackson was another victim of Kamala Harris who was later vindicated on all charges and proven innocent.
Join Telegram: https://t.co/EycePjUsEy
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.
CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG
Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment.
📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War
📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens
📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil
📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated
📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today"
📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time"
📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written
📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category
📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara
📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent
💀 91 pages
💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas
💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals
💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference
Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended.
The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record.
Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it.
I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.