Nicole Felton

New Yorker living in Georgia 😱

[Minor League Baseball @MiLB]

$10 tickets and a lifetime of memories 🥹

Visit your local ballpark: https://t.co/GqHSwP3Li3

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@PaulStone68 @Rep_Magaziner What a disgusting thing to post

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@nicksortor They found a bruise! Thank the lord!!

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@DILindseyDenton @DeathBecomesBwy @BroadwayWorld Any update on this? So crazy!

[Julia Davis @JuliaDavisNews]

Family members identified the victim as Narciso Barranco, a father to three sons who are all U.S. Marines.
https://t.co/Rt14vSHAiW

[Michael McFaul @McFaul]

Striking to me how few people are in the stands. In Moscow, they’d never let that happen! Good sign for American democracy.

[G Elliott Morris @gelliottmorris]

well that's a tough birthday party split screen

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@OsseChi Correct, Chi!! Also, I just realized that you’re Reggie’s son!! Your Dad was one of my dearest friends in law school. I hate that he’s not here to watch you soar!!

[Laurence Tribe 🇺🇦 ⚖️ @tribelaw]

Harvard will not comply with the Trump administration’s demands to alter its truth-seeking mission or its commitment to fairness. I’m proud of Harvard and its leaders. This is the moment to max out in giving to Harvard — to fill the gap Trump will create. https://t.co/ItPuSU3CKs

[Nate Silver @NateSilver538]

Hard to think of any analogy for that Duke chokejob except winning the election on inflation and then immediately raising the price of comsumer goods by 22%.

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@repdarrellissa @realDonaldTrump Hahahahahaha. Is this real??? What a joke!!!

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@RpsAgainstTrump Yes! GA!!

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@MsLaToshaBrown Yes, LaTosha!!!

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@MsLaToshaBrown Love this, LaTosha!! And love this man!!

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@AmtrakNECAlerts What about if I board at New Haven (supposed to have boarded in Bridgeport). Will my ticket be ok?

[Konk La Ree 🌯 🪕 🥾 @billtron]

Rather than negotiate like other schools, Pomona College administration is making seniors drive 40 miles across Los Angeles to attend graduation ceremonies at the Shrine Auditorium.

[Nicholas A. Christakis @NAChristakis]

The University of Chicago, as usual, striking the right balance. Worth reading in full. It is exactly right.

President Alivisatos’ Note on the Encampment (April 29, 2024)

Dear Members of the University Community, Just a few hours ago, a group of students established an encampment on the Main Quad as a form of protest. This particular tactic is now in widespread use at universities across the country. At some, encampments have been forcibly removed, with police arresting students and faculty in chaotic scenes that are disturbing. At others, encampments have persisted, despite attempts to shut them down with force. In some cases, encampments have resulted in major disruptions to learning and the activities of the university community.

Free expression is the core animating value of the University of Chicago, so it is critical that we be clear about how I and my administration think about the issue of encampments, how the actions we take in response will follow directly from our principles, and specific considerations that will influence our judgments and actions.

The general principle we will abide by is to provide the greatest leeway possible for free expression, even expression of viewpoints that some find deeply offensive. We only will intervene when what might have been an exercise of free expression blocks the learning or expression of others or that substantially disrupts the functioning or safety of the University. These are our principles. They are clear.

Two recent examples illustrate how we bring these principles into real action. First, last quarter a student group secured university permission to cover a large fraction of the Main Quad with a massive Palestinian flag consisting of thousands of tiny colored flags. The exhibit was accompanied by signage exhorting passersby to “Honor the Martyrs,” and it was staffed by students at tables during certain hours. Those students could explain to passersby why they thought it important to feature this installation, why they thought that language was appropriate, and any other views occasioned by their installation. While this protest and accompanying message were offensive to many, there was no question that it was an exercise of free expression. It stood for weeks until the end of the approved time, at which point the student group removed it, making way for others to express their views in that space as they might see fit. This example should make it clear that we approach the issue with no discrimination against the viewpoints of those participating in this encampment. We adhere to viewpoint neutrality rigorously.

As a second illustrative example, in November, a group of students and faculty undertook an occupation of Rosenwald Hall, a classroom and administration building. That was a clear disruption of the learning of others and of the normal functioning of the University. After repeated warnings, the protesters were arrested and released. They are subject now to the University’s disciplinary process, which is still pending. In short, when expression becomes disruption, we act decisively to protect the learning environment of students and the functioning of the University against genuinely disruptive protesters.

There are almost an unlimited number of ways in which students or other members of the University community can protest that violate no policies of the University at all; the spectrum of ways to express a viewpoint and seek to persuade others is vast. But establishing an encampment clearly violates policies against building structures on campus without prior approval and against overnight sleeping on campus.

I believe the protesters should also consider that an encampment, with all the etymological connections of the word to military origins, is a way of using force of a kind rather than reason to persuade others. For a short period of time, however, the impact of a modest encampment does not differ so much from a conventional rally or march. Given the importance of the expressive rights of our students, we may allow an encampment to remain for a short time despite the obvious violations of policy—but those violating university policy should expect to face disciplinary consequences.

The impact of an encampment depends on the degree to which it disrupts study, scholarship, and free movement around campus. To be clear, we will not tolerate violence or harassment directed at individuals or groups. And, disruption becomes greater the longer the encampment persists. With a 24-hour presence, day after day, we must for example divert police resources away from public safety for our campus and our community.

If necessary, we will act to preserve the essential functioning of the campus against the accumulated effects of these disruptions. I ask the students who have established this encampment to instead embrace the multitude of other tools at their disposal. Seek to persuade others of your viewpoint with methods that do not violate policies or disrupt the functioning of the University and the safety of others.

Sincerely,

Paul

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@cbouzy I’d love to think GA comes out blue (and I’m doing my best) but it’s feeling not even close to purple right now and that’s worrying me. Tell me what you’re seeing . . .

[Nicole Felton @SnikkiFelton]

@jenvanlaar That was awesome!!!