@raerine_@daylightoutofme Short women can and have been depicted fine online the issues stems from when people choose more “childish” mannerisms for said “adult” knowing the underlying meaning behind it. We’ve seen plenty of short anime characters where they’ve lacked chest, height,bust, ect.
@daylightoutofme Mind you, not even a hard search as it’s a current controversy and his past controversies have been discussed about on youtube. Use the internet for what was it intended for looking up information not defending pedophilic behavior.
@daylightoutofme I’m sure you can take 2 second out of your day to find said readily available information online if you were quick to jump on the “defense” bandwagon. But I’m more than sure you won’t do that since you chose to defend this without bothering to look anything up
@ironicpolis To sit here and say it never happened is also incorrect for you to say. This is why pedophilia is split between 2 groups, non offenders and offenders. Just because someone hasn’t committed an action doesn’t make it any less of an issue compared to someone who has.
@lightning_kf I’m really not sure where you assumed I was a furry or that furries are the only kind of people who can be against pedophilia and pedophilic ass behaviors as if one is less wrong than the other. BOTH of those things are wrong and even ILLEGAL. You just chose to cater to one
@pleasantmilksh1@arnielf_9 to cater to sexual interest in childlike characters. Everyone can argue about where the line is and have been for years now but the issue still stands and apparently becomes controversial to be against what should be a standard moral and even legal basis
@pleasantmilksh1@arnielf_9 If someone is knowingly making or promoting content to appeal to lolicons, people have every right to criticize that for its weird and often dangerous behaviors people attempts to normalize, It doesn't really matter that the characters are fictional if the content is still meant
@daylightoutofme You ARE apart of the problem by believing the issue only starts once it gets offline and in the real world but of course you won’t believe such since you’d readily defend behaviors like this which makes you nothing but a pedophile defender 😬✌️✌️✌️
@daylightoutofme “0 children were saved” doesn't address the issue even if no real child is directly harmed treating lolicons as harmless can def make some people who are into it feeltheir interests are socially acceptable
@lightning_kf I’m not sure how this honestly correlates to what I said but of course you’d find no issue with people who follow you consuming nsfw media of children.. since that is WHO you cater for