My paper with @hayleycullen_ and Beth Clarke on the prejudices of expert evidence (https://t.co/KPfgsoGMDA) in @MonULR has been cited by the High Court in Lang v The Queen: https://t.co/Wd2XIpLRwj. We talked about some expert implications from metascience.
What are we even talking about here?? When I think about my kids and my family and how they will grow up, the choice is clear to me. VOTE KAMALA HARRIS!!!
A clear demonstration of why we need a better way of getting research summaries into legal proceedings can be found by contrasting the expectation of courts (we can 'infer' reliability of summaries, from Beech-Jones, CJ at CL, as he then was):
Great to see this sort of detail about joint authorship in a law article (not surprisingly using norms from empirical fields and applying them to an empirical law article.)
Very pleased to see this out, led by the indefatigable Mark Steele. And thanks to the editors for carefully inspecting our R scripts (among other things)!
As @jeremy_gans noted, there were some disagreements about what was seen as acceptable among judges:
ISSUE 48(1): Mark Steele SC, Dr Jason Chin (@socpsychupdate) and Dr Celine van Golde (@celinevangolde) report on the views of Australian trial judges on a range of witness preparation practices and potential reforms.
https://t.co/OvW0rPeV07
You can register to attend the #aimos2024 Conference in November online for free!
We'll be there to launch MetaROR with @aimos_inc - our new community-owned platform for metaresearch operating on a publish-review-curate model.
See the full programme here: https://t.co/vyuf0lQssR
Welcome to the PPPL account! We are an APA-published journal, providing a forum in which to critically evaluate the contributions of psych & related disciplines to pub. policy & legal issues (& vice versa). Pls follow our other accounts to see journal-related content & updates.
Gino's case against us has been dismissed.
Scientists cannot effectively sue other scientists for exposing fraud/errors in their work.
Those who work to correct the scientific record can sleep better tonight. Those who don’t want it corrected, well, I don’t care how they sleep.
We're excited to share our first-ever curated article on @CrimRxiv 🚀
You can read it and learn more at https://t.co/4602MJxzS8 🧡
Congrats to @socpsychupdate, @JustinTPickett, @siminevazire, @ceptional!
We look forward to spotlighting more open criminology like theirs!
I genuinely struggle to understand how you can be a tenured psychology professor and think you can “reanalyse” a meta-analysis by literally averaging the included effects.
Is this just how bad stats education was pre 2011?
@MishaTeplitskiy that was a dangerous one for me because the original finding aligned with my intuitions but now I can see there are many reasons it could be wrong.
Submissions for #AIMOS2024 are open until Sept 2. Propose lightning talks, workshops, discussion groups, or hackathons for this 6th annual conference on #metaresearch & #openscience. Held Nov 19-21 in Canberra. Plenaries by @BarbOBrien, @jameswilsdon, & @JoanLeachCPAS.
Call for papers now open for AIMOS2024 conference. Accepting submissions for: Lightning talks, Workshops
Hackathons & Discussion groups. For more info see: https://t.co/TMQ7Z8v7oT #aimos2024
@jameswilsdon @Nature@DalmeetS@stianwestlake@RoRInstitute Funny that metascience has revealed a lot of flaws in the research used by the other unit you mention (the nudge unit).