Sol Zelic ®

Unemployed Founder ⚙️
Mapping the structures of tech, capital and beyond
I look at the machine and write exactly what is broken.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

We need an open-source political party.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

there is no view from outside, and everything that looks like chance is a consequence of that.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@LimYenKheng Well, did you like it?

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

If semantic voids are real, then they are not merely gaps in language.

They are measurable gaps in collective cognition.

Once a void is filled, people’s ability to reason changes.

Consider the word “meme.” Before it existed, the phenomenon still existed. After the word became widespread, people could analyze cultural replication much more easily.

Or consider “burnout.” The experience predated the label, but once it had a name, it became easier to recognize, discuss, and study.

The word didn’t create the phenomenon. It made it cognitively accessible.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@shivkanthb Please can you make this open source?

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

“Full access” 😂

[bbl4de @bbl4de_xyz]

We're getting there...

[Brett Adcock @adcock_brett]

Power On

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@TorontoStar It’s not that Canadians aren’t ambitious. BlackBerry was the visible case. We had the company, the talent, and the early proof. Then the conditions required to keep scaling it were allowed to erode. Everything since has followed the same logic.

[Theo - t3.gg @theo]

I hate to admit it but the loop people were right

[Convergence Boy @vicnaum]

Don't know who did this, but I want that!

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@_dylanga There are Claude wrapper plus or minus a few steps.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

I actually respect what Palantir built: the vision, the tech that works, and how Alex Karp talks about it without the usual bullshit.

The problem isn’t the intentions. The problem is the structure. They’re building a single platform that pulls data from everywhere into one place and layers AI on top to automate decisions at scale. (From an AI safety perspective.) That means one system ends up with far more visibility and steering power over operations and choices than anyone else. Put that in private hands with founder-level control, and when you look at the companies they partner with, it stops feeling like a neutral tool.

They named it after the palantir on purpose.

What am I missing?

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@eliano The collection does go hard though

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@eliano That sentence said out loud.. is dystopian just so you know.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@elonmusk @SpaceX
On Starlink scaling: With 10k+ satellites and plans for 15k–30k+

maneuver rates are already high (50k avoidance burns in recent 6 months). How does propellant budget and cascaded avoidance complexity scale in denser shells?

Kepler syndrome risk is exponential.

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@elonmusk @JonErlichman How?

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

You teach the system how you think so it can keep going when you’re not there to think it.

Right now most of what gets called institutional memory is still just documents the model pulls from. The actual gap is building something with real agency, something that holds how decisions get made and gets sharper on its own instead of needing people to keep feeding it the same patterns.

How do you close that without the loop learning to run without the people who started it?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Ultimately replacing them.

[Lewis Hamilton @LewisHamilton]

REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE

[Sol Zelic ® @Solzelic]

@oprydai Do you think we’re in a hype cycle with robotics because of AI? AI allows for advancements, but the bottleneck is physics data. How do you see the labs getting around that?