Someone Somewhere

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@allTheYud @rapid_rar2 I thought there's something off about the dath ilani Keeper version of the monk setting themselves on fire when I first read it. https://t.co/ZtajLSaMdf
I thought you'd say intelligent beings would find a way to coordinate better than that.
("not party to exchange" is tangential)

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@allTheYud @_AashishReddy Just because they failed at biological anchoring doesn't mean the trick never works. You could have just reasoned correctly about it, with correct error bars, maybe even anchored scaling laws on artificial neural nets of the time.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@QiaochuYuan

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@allTheYud Have you tried being sedentary and sipping fruit juice?

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@techbflies @allTheYud @aleksil79 I thought dath ilani had at least part of the issue, since they consider Merrin to have very high stamina, when actually she works the same hours as a surgeon on Earth.

Even compared to a Keeper, so it's not just criticizing working hours on Earth, though there is some of that.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@allTheYud Does the foolish polarization against NN charlatans not cover biology-anchored timelines charlatans?

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@RemmeltE Anonymity enables people to post unpopular opinions.

You shouldn't let the government decide which topics are exempted from free speech.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@RichardHanania @PaulRoundy1 People telling lies on the internet has big impact on the world.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

The moment a bubble pops, investors get poorer, so they invest less.
If you're trying to keep your investment in asset A sized as a fixed fraction of your portfolio value (e.g. going by the Kelly criterion), while your investment in asset B suffers a loss, you need to sell some of A.
Also, if investing in new shoes grants a fixed +1% boost to your overall productivity, then a bubble popping can cause a drop in the expected value of shoes (to the point they're not worth buying), due to the drop in expected overall productivity and wealth.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@ESYudkowsky @shaggysurvives Surely it should count as false to say?
The story says Shaggy chased guy because he was hot. So not "because" they thought he was their friend.
Surely we want the words "oh sorry i thought X" to mean the latter, in context, so we're not speaking too literally and technically.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@ManifoldMarkets @ESYudkowsky Dath ilani news was mentioned a few times, and noted to not have one problem that Earth news does.
"Televisions and radios try to expose people to statistically accurate shadows of reality where things are discussed about as often as the listeners are likely to encounter them."

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@FranciscoSalasX @ESYudkowsky @sourpatchlyds There's not much of that opportunity cost, since it can harvest both at the same time, in parallel.
It can start harvesting a planet by sending a tea spoon sized robot to it. This takes only a small amount of resources away from harvesting stars.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@RokoMijic @Submetallic @Nst_Egorova If you start mass-manufacturing and cheaply selling something that's physically identical to a woman, men will know that the only object of value/prestige is a woman with a genuine pre-2025 birth certificate.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@GarrettPetersen There's one such game called Battle Navigation in the MMORPG Puzzle Pirates.
Each ship is captained by one player, and the simultaneous action includes rules for ship collisions.
This video shows a big team vs team scenario.
https://t.co/0l0hPSaPcK

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@ArgonGruber @jd_pressman To that example, the answer is no. That choice has no effect on that belief.
He believes that AGI will killeveryone, and he wants someone to explain how it might not, and thus "justify" believing that it might not.
The nukes seem less likely to killeveryone.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@AIDRIVR The visualization still has over 400 ms latency on the changing traffic light.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@wholemars Could you test the photon-to-control latency using a traffic light that's turning green?

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@srihari__ Will v13 improve photon-to-control latency?

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@aelluswamy @Tesla_AI Why is the latency slower than human? Why is it like 8 frames of time and not like 2?
I tried measuring the latency for reacting to a traffic light turning green. It looks like 300 ms for the path planner to appear and 400 ms for the visualization to show the light changing.

[Someone Somewhere @SomePersonToo]

@SilverJacket @RichardMCNgo > It is not difficult to see that, for any x,y,u,v (unless the pairs coincide completely), (x,y) is unlucky is independent from (u,v) is unlucky

I don't think so, if they coincide partially, even in d=2.