Spayd

Catholic, Proud American, Husband, Father, Conservative, St. Louis Cardinals, Red Wings, Indy Colts. PragerU: "Capitalism Makes, Socialism Takes!"

[Sassafrass84 @Sassafrass_84]

True story. The commies have never and will never win.

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@LeaveTheMedia @Bitcoin_Teddy The banks were responding to a market created by government which was not sound! He’s right. Clinton’s 1st time home program buying a home with 3% down donated by the seller created a need to bundle subprime mortgages to get them off the books! Blame banks but it was Clinton.

[Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet @Tironianae]

🚨 BREAKING: The Deep State is scrambling after Obama DEA official gets criminally INDICTED for helping the cartels, agreeing to launder $12 MILLION dollars

Democrats support terrorists. It’s confirmed.

ROOT IT ALL OUT!

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@krassenstein You’re an idiot!

[Dr Jordan B Peterson @jordanbpeterson]

To the Americans:

I've travelled all over the world. I've familiarized myself with many places, and met many people. And I'm a Canadian, although I’m privileged to reside once again in the States.

And here's something I've noticed, and it’s a key element of America's continuing greatness:

You bloody Americans value success, and you believe in its existence.

This is something that doesn't really happen anywhere else in the world. Even in other free democracies—the United Kingdom; Finland, Sweden, and Norway; Australia, New Zealand and Canada; Germany, France, and the Netherlands (great countries all)—a counterproductive cynicism too often reigns.

Success is equated with exploitation.
Ambition is looked upon with contempt.

This happens sometimes in the United States too—particularly among the miserable progressives, who confuse their resentment, ingratitude and unearned skepticism with wisdom.

But in your great country, by and large, striving is admired and success celebrated.

This means that more people strive and succeed in the US than anywhere else. And it's increasingly obvious. You remain stunningly more innovative and productive than any people anywhere else on the planet.

And so I say, as all should who are fortunate enough to live in the western world, let alone America:

Thank God for the United States.

Thank God for the wisdom of its founders.
Thank God for its faith in the free market and in the natural rights of man.
Happy birthday, you damn Yankees and Southerners.

Long may your admirable country dominate the world.

Long may your freedom and hope provide an example to those suffering everywhere at the hands of their malevolent states.

May your two and a half centuries of unparallelled success be just the beginning.

Your country is the light of the world, and the city on the hill.

Thank God for the USA.

Happy 250th.

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

[C-Reason🇺🇸 @CreasonJana]

I didn’t care about your politics or your color until …

[lelemSLP @lelemSLP]

"Palestinians" kidnapped Eden Yerushalmi, starved and tortured for 11 months, used for propaganda video and then murdered when there was a chance she'd be saved.

Her dead body weighted 35 kg.

"Pro-Palestinians" consider it "legitimate resistance". It says so much about them.

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@RonnieAdkins @Snakeeater36 The left will celebrate this. They are clueless to service, chain of command, and love of country!

[🇺🇸 Edward T. Winslow @EdwardTWinz]

CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG

Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment.

📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War
📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens
📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil
📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated
📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today"
📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time"
📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written
📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category
📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara
📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent

💀 91 pages
💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas
💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals
💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference

Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended.

The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record.

Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it.

I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.

[NWRain-Judi @RYboating]

Good morning friends!
Happy Monday!
Wishing you all a great day!🤗

I too am embarrassed of people who think like Joy Behar. 😉👇👇👇🇺🇸

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@atrupar @jaketapper Unless, of course they are here illegally, or on a temporary status and soaking off our welfare programs or worse committing crimes. In which case, get out!

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@ChuckPfarrer Dude as a former Navy Seal, striving for factual accuracy should be pure muscle memory! Your socialist Democrat is showing. Zip up your pants!

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@illflyaway21 @RNCResearch Not a republican. This is another liberal flake who will say anything and believe anything to advance the socialist policies of the Democrat party!

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@KurtSchlichter A flake, supported by Flake! Sounds like a couple of flakes!

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@Vote4Dick2028 @RepLuna Our elections are not legal and Democrats have no interest in full transparency. They have and will continue to subvert the law to win elections. Your position aids their effort. Well done Richard.

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@Vote4Dick2028 @RepLuna Perfect. I have both.

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@Vote4Dick2028 @RepLuna Pure non-sense. Polls suggest 85% of the population want the law.
How is it any difference from a back ground check to purchase a gun?

I'll save you a reply. No difference. And therefore your concerns are of a liberal who support Democrat FRAUD!

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@Vote4Dick2028 @RepLuna Assuming the id reduces illegal votes, (which I believe occurs)being against the law implies you are ok with voter fraud.

Why would anyone be unwilling to support 1 common voting law to verify citizenship for 50 states?
How about verified voter rolls. Any problem with this?

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@Vote4Dick2028 @RepLuna Citizen w/official Federal voting ID (not a gym membership card or drivers license or SAM's club card) must present ID when voting (or receiving mail in ballot). No ID, No Vote. If we can do back ground checks to exercise our 2nd amendment rights...shouldn't be hard.

Now you.

[Spayd @SpaydMichael]

@Vote4Dick2028 @RepLuna Why are you ok with voter fraud?