[Pinning this post on both of my accounts for a reason. It is maybe the most important piece I have ever written.]
To President Trump:
I would so much enjoy seeing you make a decision that serves your peace efforts more than anything else.
This is how it could work:
Get together with the most trustworthy Rabbis and discuss Jewish scripture with them.
Specifically discuss the old prophet Isaiah, who spoke at a time when prophets still were scrutinized for the accuracy of their predictions.
In chapter 2:4 he says: "And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."
Halt for a moment and repeat: He shall judge among the nations.
Remember that prophets had to be right - the Torah put a prophet’s life on the line if he spoke in God’s name what God had not spoken. So let's assume Isaiah was right and this is going to happen.
Now the question is: on which side will the USA end up under your leadership? The condemned, or the righteous?
Try to imagine this:
You get the arms industry to a conference table and convince them to start the process of converting their production to civil products gradually, say 5% or 10% per year.
Now where you have added @elonmusk to your new military planning team, there is a realistic chance that this can be done in an efficient way.
He has not only the competence to lead a major transformation, most importantly he also has visionary power and can precisely tell you which steps to do in which sequence.
Then you announce that the USA has made a U-turn. Then you denuclearize in tandem with Russia and the other nuclear countries.
The Bible promises it. Somebody at some point in the future will do it. Will it be you, President Trump?
@the_andrey_x And your election will not be rigged because...?
Watch Brazil tomorrow. Maybe the rot is just about to jump to a new feeding ground, after it has sucked USrael dry.
The first lady who previously helped return Ukrainian children has now arranged a pause so the elderly still trapped in one occupied town can leave or receive medicine.
The White House said on 23 October that Melania Trump secured a localized ceasefire in Oleshky, the Russian-occupied city in Ukraine’s Kherson region. Both sides agreed to stop military action so aid can enter and civilians can leave through a designated passage.
The pause is set to begin 29 October. Oleshky’s remaining population is mostly elderly, with roughly 1,700 to 2,000 people still there from a pre-war 24,000, plus about 50 children. Residents have limited electricity, mined roads, and regular attacks.
Melania Trump said the city came to her attention during a private discussion at the UN General Assembly; she and a representative then used an existing channel from earlier child reunifications.
Ukrainian and Russian officials confirmed the arrangement and said their forces were coordinating the exact timing. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov welcomed her contribution.
A short stop in the firing can move medicine and people who cannot walk far. It does not decide what happens to the town after the last vehicle leaves.
--- Historical Context ---
Carry the present corridor back to the March week Russian forces first entered the city.
Russian troops occupied Oleshky in early March 2022, days after the full-scale invasion began. The town sits on the left (eastern) bank of the Dnipro river, directly across from Kherson city on the right (western) bank.
Local officials reported immediate shortages of food and medicine. In the months that followed, both sides fired across the river.
Ukrainian officials argued that the occupation cut off supplies and forced residents to live under military administration. Russian officials argued that the town was liberated and that any shortages came from Ukrainian shelling.
In November 2022 Russian forces withdrew from the western bank, including Kherson city, and pulled back onto the eastern bank where Oleshky lay. The river became the front line.
Melania Trump’s earlier work had focused on returning children taken to Russia. The present arrangement opens a timed window for civilian teams and for residents to choose where to go next.
The White House is arguing that the corridor and the timed stop will move people and supplies. Local voices on both banks are arguing that the same window can close as soon as the last vehicle leaves.
The next truck that crosses the river will show which reading holds.
--- Spiritual Perspective ---
Open the care papers next to the older pattern of provision that women have carried, and the stubborn force the men have kept in motion.
Proverbs 31:15 says of the woman of valor "She gets up while it is still night; she provides food for her family and portions for her female servants."
The verse sits inside a longer portrait of steady, practical care that keeps the household alive while others sleep. Melania Trump’s channel for the elderly in Oleshky is that same care: medicine, water, and a way out for people who cannot fight.
The men who command the armies on both banks have kept the firing going for years. Their argument is that the next strike will secure the ground. Her argument is that the people still inside the town need food and a road today.
Yin and yang name the same split.
Yin is the receptive, the yielding, the care that feeds and carries. Yang is the active, the pushing, the force that holds the line and fires.
Neither is whole by itself. When yang runs without yin, the ground is held and the people inside it starve. When yin moves without yang, the care arrives and has no protection.
The word "integrity" comes to mind. Integrity means something like decency now, but originally the meaning was "whole" or "complete".
A complete personality can hold both: the mindset that opens the corridor to rescue the desperate, and the mindset that fights for the land and the people.
Ideally it would also cultivate diplomacy rather than "communicate with weapons", as Mr. War Secretary has said. Tell me - is there a chance that this can happen in the near future?
@JulianAssange OMG what a day for you to surface again! Should you not rather focus on your new baby?
We are waiting with great anxiety for the results from Brazil.
They had a lot of time to recalibrate their voting machines. And they are not a small country.
What will happen to BRICS?
He told me this in private chat (not sure why he did not reply):
The video depicts a chaotic industrial rendering or slaughterhouse byproduct area filled with piles of animal heads, offal, bones, and fleshy remains submerged in liquid, with heavy machinery, bins, and workers in protective gear moving material.
This is typical footage from facilities that process slaughter waste into products like pet food ingredients, bone meal, tallow, or fertilizers, rather than direct human-grade meat cutting lines.
The original post connects it to JBS operations to highlight concerns over large-scale meat production hygiene, though the exact location and company sourcing of the clip remain unverified in the thread.
@SamaHoole You just explained something I did not know.
The cows on Bovaer will then breathe out hydrogen?
Will the next stage of the trial test how to best burn it down?
@ImBreckWorsham Looks like they don't need a nuclear weapon after all.
Just a good think tank.
If USrael had strategists like this, they would never have touched Iran.
@BrianRoemmele What if the person is not the brain?
But an energy being that uses the brain as a transceiver between two worlds?
Extensive near death studies say so.
Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience
Pim van Lommel, M.D. HarperOne, 2010. Dutch edition, Eindeloos bewustzijn, 2007.
https://t.co/YWHWgGOdZ9
** Summary **
Pim van Lommel is a Dutch cardiologist. In the late 1980s his patients began telling him what they had seen while the monitors said they were dead.
He then ran a prospective study in ten Dutch hospitals: 344 people who had survived cardiac arrest, interviewed before anyone could sort the stories.
Sixty-two, about 18 percent, reported a conscious experience during the flatline. He published the result in The Lancet in 2001. This book is the long account.
His conclusion is the one that sits under Monday’s Nobel prize. The brain does not produce consciousness. It receives it. He compares the brain to a transceiver: it passes a signal, it does not invent the broadcast.
A stopped heart, on that reading, ends the body. It does not end the person. Death, he writes, may be a change of state, as birth is.
** Evaluation **
This is a hospital study plus an argument, not a proof that a soul survives.
Eighteen percent is not everyone. Memory after a revival can be rebuilt. Oxygen loss, drugs, and later telling can all shape a report.
Van Lommel’s answer is that the clearest accounts came from the minutes when the cortex should have had nothing to report. Other teams have found the same kind of story. None of them has filmed the mind leaving.
What the book is good for today is the limit on the lamp. A blue light can make a chosen nerve cell fire. That is a tool. It is not a map of the person the cell sits in.
In the Gospel of Thomas we already read that the light is inside. Van Lommel is the physician who tried to say the same thing with a cardiac monitor.
** From the book **
On what the brain is doing:
“The function of the brain can be compared to a transceiver; our brain has a facilitating rather than a producing role: it enables the experience of consciousness.”
On the reach of that consciousness:
“Ultimately, we cannot avoid the conclusion that endless consciousness has always been and always will be, independently of the body. There is no beginning and there will never be an end to our consciousness.”
On the door itself:
“For this reason we ought to seriously consider the possibility that death, like birth, may be a mere passing from one state of consciousness into another and that during life the body functions as an interface or place of resonance.”
** Connection to today **
Stockholm gave a Nobel prize for a light switch in a nerve cell. The switch is real. The mind is still the room the cell sits in. This book says the lamp fires the cell. It does not make the person.
The Hague unsealed the school ministers' arrest warrants. The girls are still out of the classrooms. A warrant is a paper. A shut door is an act. Neither one closes a consciousness. The question that remains is who is teaching a child this morning.
Aden ordered the country taken back. Sanaa has heard that order before. The child who already lived through one “until the country is liberated” is not the podium. The new shells are the new act. The harvest of that seed is not in yet.
@PeynsaertBill This is not fair what you say about the IDF heroes.
It would be much easier to just flatten the place with a 2000 pound bomb.
Don't you see that they are trying to save lives before they destroy everything these people own, on their own land?
@WhiteHouse I thought Americans live in America?
You had no business being in Lebanon.
Neither had, or has, your greatest ally, Israel.
These fighters defended their country against illegal raiders.
"Swords to plowshares" - promised to us in the Bible by prophet Isaiah - was recently quoted by no other than the most prominent peace activist of our time, Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu.
I thought my brain would explode ��
"Know them by their fruits"...
But it is possible - see roadmap in the attached post. We just need to replace the ancient vocables with modern ones.
The Bible says so!
[Pinning this post on both of my accounts for a reason. It is maybe the most important piece I have ever written.]
To President Trump:
I would so much enjoy seeing you make a decision that serves your peace efforts more than anything else.
This is how it could work:
Get together with the most trustworthy Rabbis and discuss Jewish scripture with them.
Specifically discuss the old prophet Isaiah, who spoke at a time when prophets still were scrutinized for the accuracy of their predictions.
In chapter 2:4 he says: "And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."
Halt for a moment and repeat: He shall judge among the nations.
Remember that prophets had to be right - the Torah put a prophet’s life on the line if he spoke in God’s name what God had not spoken. So let's assume Isaiah was right and this is going to happen.
Now the question is: on which side will the USA end up under your leadership? The condemned, or the righteous?
Try to imagine this:
You get the arms industry to a conference table and convince them to start the process of converting their production to civil products gradually, say 5% or 10% per year.
Now where you have added @elonmusk to your new military planning team, there is a realistic chance that this can be done in an efficient way.
He has not only the competence to lead a major transformation, most importantly he also has visionary power and can precisely tell you which steps to do in which sequence.
Then you announce that the USA has made a U-turn. Then you denuclearize in tandem with Russia and the other nuclear countries.
The Bible promises it. Somebody at some point in the future will do it. Will it be you, President Trump?
The UN marks the day to abolish nuclear weapons while nine states keep them and a tenth is on the table.
High-level plenary today in the Trusteeship Council Chamber, 10:00-13:00 and 15:00-18:00. The day itself was Saturday 26 Sep; the meeting moved to Tuesday.
Guterres on 26 Sep: "The threat of nuclear catastrophe is immediate and growing." About 12,187 warheads remain. No nuclear weapon has been physically destroyed under a treaty. No disarmament negotiation is open.
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons has been in force since 2021, with 75 states parties. None of the nine possessors (US, Russia, China, France, UK, India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea) have joined. Six more states host other states' bombs.
Same week: US intelligence told Congress that Saudi Arabia has not ruled out a weapons option while a civil deal sits before Congress. Italy last week authorised small reactors only. The Iran war is still running.
--- Historical Context ---
If you let the calendar sit next to the arsenal list, the gap is the story.
The date is not random. On the night of 26 September 1983 the Soviet duty officer Stanislav Petrov sat in the early-warning bunker at Serpukhov-15 and watched the screens report five incoming Minuteman missiles.
The written rule was to pass the alarm up. Petrov judged it a false reading from a new satellite and held the line.
The satellites had mistaken sunlight on high cloud. Had he followed the book, the duty general would have had minutes to wake the General Staff.
The UN General Assembly used that same calendar day in 2013 for its first high-level meeting on nuclear disarmament and then, in resolution 68/32, named 26 September the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.
The possessors did not come to the table that created the 2021 ban treaty. They modernised instead.
The 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty had already split the world into five recognised possessors who promised, in Article VI, to negotiate disarmament in good faith, and everyone else who promised not to build.
Article VI has no deadline. The 2026 Review Conference is the next formal chance to say whether that promise still means anything.
Petrov's choice was one man and five false lights. Today's meeting is 193 flags and twelve thousand real warheads.
--- Spiritual Perspective ---
Now look at the spiritual angle of a day that names the end of the weapon while the weapon is being refurbished.
The Law of One material treats the nuclear device as a thought that has become matter at a density the planet can barely hold.
Seth, in the Jane Roberts books, said "you create your own reality" and then added that mass events are the meeting of many private realities at once.
A stockpile is that meeting of minds, frozen.
The life lesson is not "ban the bomb" as a chant. It is that a species which keeps a suicide switch on the desk has not yet accepted that Earth is a school and that the afterlife does not need a second sun over a city.
You do not have to pretend the nine will sign this year. You only have to notice that the day exists, that Petrov existed, and that the focus of attention can still move from the warhead to the hand that does not lift the phone.