@DennisField8@CriticalBard@WyrmwoodGaming I honestly donโt get why ppl are mad at the video. It was just Doug explaining his side of the story with no script. It seemed like his honest thoughts about what happened. If it had been scripted, ppl would have called it disingenuous corporate speak.
@CatieOsaurus I call my cat:
Fuzz face
Fluffy bunny filled with cheese
Fuzzy Bun
Silly kitty
Stinky kitty
Silly bunny
Little bastard
Dumbass
Handsome boy
Smooshy face
Z butt
His name is actually Z
@Owen_Stephens Theater if the mind is good for simple encounters but I prefer VTT for complex fights since (as a low vision player/DM) it is the most accessible. I still love collecting minis and terrain though, even if I never use them in my games.
๐ญ - Big Giveaway! - ๐ญ
We are giving away a truly one-of-a kind item this year: the Gingerbread House Dice Tower, with a snowy front yard โ! Handcrafted from exotic Peruvian Walnut by our top Crafting Wizard: J ๐งโโ๏ธ and The Laser Lord: Owen ๐.
#Giveaway
Rules are below ๐
@Andantonius The point about promoting the IP makes sense but I don't see how the art produced is any more "original". A fan artist of Pikachu will still draw the eyes the same way, still have the yellow color and lightning tail. Would those not be the same elements an AI generator takes?
@Andantonius Serious question: So it is understandable that people are upset that AI art is made up of elements taken from artists without their consent. But Is this worse than artists who make and sell fan art without the original creator's content? If so, why?