ADOR just showed how messed up this contract clause really is.
They’re trying to terminate Danielle over an “ATTEMPT” to engage with an external offer. Which, in normal human language, means nothing actually happened.
Danielle did not signed any contract and no real damage was done towards ADOR.
But here’s the absurd part. The contract is written so broadly that ADOR can basically ignore and abuse all of that.
It doesn’t just stop artists from signing competing deals, it says if anyone even approaches you, you have to report it within three days. Miss that window, or if you don’t even think that counts, it’s an automatic breach.
So apparently you’re not even allowed to talk. Casual conversations, exploratory discussions, or offers that go absolutely nowhere can all be used against the artist later.
You’re expected to monitor every single interaction, while the company gets to decide, after the fact, what counts as wrongdoing.
And the so-called “correction period” is a joke. How can they “fix” a conversation that you assumed already happened? They obviously can’t undo it. They can’t rewind time.
Once ADOR decides something is a problem, there’s basically no way out.
This doesn’t show Danielle being disloyal. It just shows how easily the contract clause can be abused when a company decides control matters more than fairness.
In simple terms, the moment any artist signs their contract, they are basically sold.
#NEWJEANS_IS_FIVE
@karinafan123412@alldoorsoneroom So we’re protecting the NewJeans image… just not from the guy constantly speculating and magically having ‘inside info’? Fascinating strategy.
This is Rhea Bullos, she's 11 and couldn't afford to buy sport shoes to compete, so she covered her feet with plasters and drew Nike logo on them. And guess what, she won 3 gold medals (400, 800 and 1500m)