@WayBack69420@johannesmkx No he was very careful not to touch him. This is a sociopathic technique to be provocative and elicit a mild defensive reaction and get physical contact to justify violence
@TheIllegit@memeticsisyphus@JadeAtrophis The claim was no legal right to use force which is true. Nobody is going to prosecute a slight push in that situation and it certainly isn’t grounds for stabbing someone.
@RonnyNapalm@donb80355611@AppyOrtho It is not assault. A threat is assault, but a conditional threat is not legally a threat. Saying “I’ll kill you if you touch my daughter” for example doesn’t qualify legally.
@ModestyQueen19 Ahmaud Arbery. The men chased him with a gun, illegally, due to suspected theft and attempted an illegal citizen’s arrest. He attempted to wrestle the gun away. He was shot at this point. The men pled self-defense due to his grabbing the gun. Their defense did not fly.
@Bruce0377272047@jasonwhitlock The difference is a large swath of the
population thinks it is virtuous while white supremacists are universally condemned
@ToadTownPatriot She doesn’t even disagree. Her position is
that you’re just not supposed to talk about downsides of immigration because it smacks of xenophobia. “Bad look bro”
@NCFamilyNCmom@GoodBannedName@SandwichesSoup@Heal_within96@dmoonglampers_ No, that’s exoneration after wrongful
conviction. All exonerations are orders of magnitude higher.
Men are something like 85-90% of all exonerations, which isn’t proof of anything other than men are more likely to commit crimes and be indicted.